Dataset Information

Quantitative measurement properties and score interpretation of the Cough Severity Diary in patients with chronic cough.

ABSTRACT: AIMS:The Cough Severity Diary (CSD) was developed in accordance with the FDA guidance for patient-reported outcome measures and is focused on capturing the patient's perception of cough in terms of frequency, intensity, and disruption due to their cough. The measure includes a series of seven items asking patients to rate the frequency (three items), intensity (two items), and disruptiveness (two items) of their cough. The instrument was designed to be completed daily before bedtime, has a recall period of 'today,' and responses to items are entered on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 with anchors on each end. The objective of this analysis was to confirm the domain structure of the CSD and assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in adult patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC/UCC). Criteria for defining meaningful changes in mean weekly CSD total and domain scores in the context of a clinical trial were also developed. METHODS:Pooled data from a phase II randomized controlled trial of an investigational treatment for RCC/UCC were analyzed. Participants were non-smokers, had RCC/UCC for ?1?year, and a baseline cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) ?40?mm. CSD scores (baseline, week 4), were analyzed; the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), cough severity VAS, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and objective cough frequency counts were used for validation. CSD domain structure (Total, Frequency, Intensity, Disruption) was assessed for scoring. RESULTS:A total of 253 participants were included (mean age 60.2; 76% female). Global fit of the three-factor CSD was acceptable. For the CSD total score, internal consistency (??=?0.89) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient?=?0.68) were high. CSD total scores were correlated with the LCQ total (r?=?-0.62) and cough severity VAS (r?=?0.84). Participants with a PGIC score of 1 or 2 (most improved groups) had the greatest mean score improvement on the CSD Total (Day 0 to Day 28), supporting responsiveness (similar findings for subscales). A change threshold of ?1.3-point reduction on the total and subscale scores is appropriate to define clinically meaningful improvement. CONCLUSION:The CSD is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of cough symptom severity in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough and fit-for-purpose for assessing changes in cough severity in clinical trials. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

SUBMITTER: Martin Nguyen A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7225816 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantitative measurement properties and score interpretation of the Cough Severity Diary in patients with chronic cough.

Martin Nguyen Allison A Bacci Elizabeth E Dicpinigaitis Peter P Vernon Margaret M

Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease 20200101

<h4>Aims</h4>The Cough Severity Diary (CSD) was developed in accordance with the FDA guidance for patient-reported outcome measures and is focused on capturing the patient's perception of cough in terms of frequency, intensity, and disruption due to their cough. The measure includes a series of seven items asking patients to rate the frequency (three items), intensity (two items), and disruptiveness (two items) of their cough. The instrument was designed to be completed daily before bedtime, has ...[more]

PMID: 32345170

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRefractory chronic cough (RCC), a cough lasting longer than 8 weeks with an unexplained underlying etiology and unresponsive to conventional treatment, can have substantial effects on patients' quality of life. For assessment of the efficacy of antitussive medication in clinical trials in RCC, patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments should be fit for purpose with appropriate content validity. Here we describe the qualitative testing of a newly developed PRO instrument: the Severity of Chronic Cough Diary (SCCD).MethodsThe SCCD was developed to assess patients' symptom experience of cough in patients with RCC. A preliminary version was tested and refined based on an iterative process in a qualitative study. In total, three rounds of interviews were conducted with adult participants diagnosed with RCC in the USA (n = 19) and UK (n = 10). Rounds 1-3 consisted of hybrid concept elicitation (CE) interviews and cognitive interviews (CIs), with Round 3 also including interviews in a subset of participants (n = 5) about the usability of the SCCD as administered on an electronic handheld device.ResultsThe CE interviews identified concepts important to patients' experiences related to RCC that were broadly in line with the concepts in the preliminary version of the SCCD. Participants provided positive feedback on the draft SCCD across all CI rounds, reporting the instrument to be relevant and straightforward to complete, and containing a comprehensive set of concepts to evaluate their symptom experience of RCC. Participants demonstrated a good understanding of proposed item wording, response options, and the 24-hour recall period, and thought completion of the SCCD on the electronic device was easy. Following revisions based on results from each interview round, the SCCD at the end of this qualitative research study had 14 items assessing the concepts of: cough symptoms (five items), symptoms related to cough (four items), disruption to activities due to cough (three items), and disruption to sleep due to cough (two items).ConclusionsThe results of this study provide qualitative evidence supporting the content validity of the SCCD as a PRO instrument for evaluating outcomes of therapies for RCC in clinical trials.

Project description:IntroductionPatients with chronic cough experience considerable burden. The cough severity visual analog scale (VAS) records patients' assessment of cough severity on a 100-mm linear scale ranging from "no cough" (0 mm) to "worst cough" (100 mm). Although cough severity scales are widely used in clinical practice and research, their use in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough has not been formally validated.MethodsThis analysis includes data from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial of the P2X3-receptor antagonist gefapixant for treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough (NCT02612610). Cough severity VAS scores were assessed at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The cough severity VAS was validated using several outcomes, including the Cough Severity Diary (CSD), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale, and objective cough frequency. Validation metrics included test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation (i.e., clinically meaningful change threshold).ResultsThe analysis included 253 patients (median age, 61.0 years; females, 76%). Test-retest reliability of the cough severity VAS was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.51). The cough severity VAS had acceptable convergent validity with other related measures (Pearson r of 0.53 and -0.41 for CSD and LCQ total scores, respectively; p < 0.0001 for each). Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences in mean cough severity VAS scores across severity groups defined using CSD, LCQ, and cough frequency tertiles. A large effect size was observed in patients with the greatest improvements in PGIC (Cohen d = -1.8). A ⩾ 30-mm reduction in the cough severity VAS was estimated as a clinically meaningful change threshold for clinical trials in chronic cough.ConclusionsThe cough severity VAS is a valid and responsive measure. A cough severity VAS reduction of ⩾ 30 mm can discriminate clinically meaningful changes in chronic cough severity in clinical studies.

Project description:BackgroundThe differential sensitivity of cough to antitussive therapies implies the existence of heterogeneity in cough hypersensitivity, but how such heterogeneity is expressed across individual patients is poorly understood. We investigated the phenotypes of cough hypersensitivity by examining transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1)- and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1)-mediated cough sensitivity in patients with chronic refractory cough.MethodsUsing a selective TRPA1 agonist, allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), we established an AITC cough challenge as a measure of TRPA1-mediated cough sensitivity. The AITC cough challenge and the widely used capsaicin (a selective TRPV1 agonist) cough challenge were performed with 250 patients with chronic refractory cough and 56 healthy subjects. The concentration of AITC or capsaicin solution causing at least two (C2) and five coughs (C5) was recorded. Cough sensitivity was expressed as the mean (95% confidence interval) of log C5, and cough hypersensitivity was defined as a log C5 value lower than that of healthy subjects.ResultsA distinct concentration-response effect of inhaled AITC was identified both in patients with chronic refractory cough and in healthy subjects. Cough sensitivity to AITC and capsaicin was significantly higher in patients than in healthy subjects (AITC: 2.42 [2.37-2.48] vs 2.72 [2.66-2.78] mM, p = 0.001; capsaicin: 1.87 [1.75-1.98] vs 2.53 [2.36-2.70] μM, p = 0.001) and was higher in females than in males for both healthy subjects and patients (all p < 0.05). Among the 234 patients who completed both challenges, 25 (10.7%) exhibited hypersensitivity to both AITC and capsaicin, 44 (18.8%) showed hypersensitivity to AITC only, 28 (11.9%) showed hypersensitivity to capsaicin only, and 137 (58.6%) exhibited hypersensitivity to neither. Those with TRPA1- and/or TRPV1-mediated hypersensitivity were predominantly female, while those without TRPA1- and TRPV1-mediated hypersensitivity were mainly male.ConclusionsFour phenotypes of cough hypersensitivity were identified by the activation of TRPV1 and TRPA1 channels, which supports the existence of heterogeneity in cough pathways and provides a new direction for personalized management of chronic refractory cough.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02591550 .

Dataset Information

Quantitative measurement properties and score interpretation of the Cough Severity Diary in patients with chronic cough.

Publications

Quantitative measurement properties and score interpretation of the Cough Severity Diary in patients with chronic cough.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets