Dataset Information

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: Its Uses in Osteoarthritis.

ABSTRACT: Human bone marrow (BM) is a kind of source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as well as growth factors and cytokines that may aid anti-inflammation and regeneration for various tissues, including cartilage and bone. However, since MSCs in BM usually occupy only a small fraction (0.001%) of nucleated cells, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) for cartilage pathologies, such as cartilage degeneration, defect, and osteoarthritis, have gained considerable recognition in the last few years due to its potential benefits including disease modifying and regenerative capacity. Although further research with well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials is needed to elucidate the exact mechanism of BMAC, this may have the most noteworthy effect in patients with osteoarthritis. The purpose of this article is to review the general characteristics of BMAC, including its constituent, action mechanisms, and related issues. Moreover, this article aims to summarize the clinical outcomes of BMAC reported to date.

SUBMITTER: Kim GB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7247342 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: Its Uses in Osteoarthritis.

Kim Gi Beom GB Seo Min-Soo MS Park Wook Tae WT Lee Gun Woo GW

International journal of molecular sciences 20200502 9

Human bone marrow (BM) is a kind of source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as well as growth factors and cytokines that may aid anti-inflammation and regeneration for various tissues, including cartilage and bone. However, since MSCs in BM usually occupy only a small fraction (0.001%) of nucleated cells, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) for cartilage pathologies, such as cartilage degeneration, defect, and osteoarthritis, have gained considerable recognition in the last few years due to ...[more]

PMID: 32370163

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: In the last decade, regenerative therapies have become one of the leading disease modifying options for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Still, there is a lack of trials with a direct comparison of different biological treatments. Our aim was to directly compare clinical outcomes of knee injections of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC), Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP), or Hyaluronic acid (HA) in the OA treatment. Methods: Patients with knee pain and osteoarthritis KL grade II to IV were randomized to receive a BMAC, PRP, and HA injection in the knee. VAS, WOMAC, KOOS, and IKDC scores were used to establish baseline values at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. All side effects were reported. Results: A total of 175 patients with a knee osteoarthritis KL grade II-IV were randomized; 111 were treated with BMAC injection, 30 with HA injection, and 34 patients with PRP injection. There were no differences between these groups when considering KL grade, BMI, age, or gender. There were no serious side effects. The mean VAS scores after 3, 7, 14, and 21 days showed significant differences between groups with a drop of VAS in all groups but with a difference in the BMAC group in comparison to other groups (p < 0.001). There were high statistically significant differences between baseline scores and those after 12 months (p < 0.001) in WOMAC, KOOS, KOOS pain, and IKDC scores, and in addition, there were differences between these scores in the BMAC group in comparison with other groups, except for the PRP group in WOMAC and the partial IKDC score. There were no differences between the HA and PRP groups, although PRP showed a higher level of clinical improvement. Conclusions: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate, Leukocyte rich Platelet Rich Plasma, and Hyaluronic acid injections are safe therapeutic options for knee OA and provide positive clinical outcomes after 12 months in comparison with findings preceding the intervention. BMAC could be better in terms of clinical improvements in the treatment of knee OA than PRP and HA up to 12 months. PRP provides better outcomes than HA during the observation period, but these results are not statistically significant. More randomized controlled trials and high quality comparative studies are needed for direct correlative conclusions.

Project description:BackgroundDespite the high prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), there remains a need for additional therapeutic options. Cellular therapies with minimally manipulated cells such as bone marrow aspirate concentrates (BMAC) are increasingly popular in the U.S. but clear-cut evidence of efficacy has not been established. In theory, BMAC injections provide a source of stromal cells to stimulate healing in OA and ligamentous injuries; however, BMAC injections are also often associated with inflammation, short-term pain, and mobility impairment. Given that blood is known to trigger inflammation in joints, we hypothesized that removing erythrocytes [red blood cells (RBCs)] from BMAC preparations prior to intra-articular injection would improve efficacy for OA treatment.MethodsTo test this hypothesis, BMAC was collected from the bone marrow of mice. Three treatment groups were pursued: (I) untreated; (II) BMAC; or (III) BMAC depleted of RBCs by lysis. Product was injected into the femorotibial joint of mice 7 days after OA had been induced by destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM). To assess the impact of treatment on joint function, individual cage monitoring (ANY-mazeTM) and Digigait treadmill-based analyses were performed over 4 weeks. At study completion, joint histopathology was assessed and immune transcriptomes within joint tissues were compared using a species-specific NanoString panel.ResultsSignificant improvements in activity, gait parameters, and histology scores were seen in animals receiving RBC-depleted BMAC compared to untreated mice; animals treated with non-depleted BMAC did not demonstrate this same extent of consistent significant improvement. Transcriptomic analysis of joint tissues revealed significant upregulation of key anti-inflammatory genes, including interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IRAP), in mice treated with RBC-depleted BMAC compared to animals treated with non-RBC depleted BMAC.ConclusionsThese findings indicate that RBC depletion in BMAC prior to intra-articular injection improves treatment efficacy and reduces joint inflammation compared to BMAC.

Project description:Background: There is a need to identify and quantify mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in human bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) source tissues, but current methods to do so were established in cultured cell populations. Given that surface marker and gene expression change in cultured cells, it is doubtful that these strategies are valid to quantify MSCs in fresh BMAC. Purpose: To establish the presence, quantity, and heterogeneity of BMAC-derived MSCs in minimally manipulated BMAC using currently available strategies. Study Design: Descriptive Laboratory Study. Methods: Five published strategies to identify MSCs were compared for suitability and efficiency to quantify clinical-grade BMAC-MSCs and cultured MSCs at the single cell transcriptome level on BMAC samples being used clinically from fifteen orthopedic patients and on one cultured MSC sample. Strategies included: 1) the guidelines by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT), 2) CD271 expression, 3) the Ghazanfari et al. transcriptional profile, 4) the Jia et al. transcriptional profile, and 5) the Silva et al. transcriptional profile. Results: ISCT guidelines did not identify any MSCs in BMAC at the transcriptional level and only 1 in 9 million cells at the protein level. 9 of 12850 BMAC cells expressed the CD271 gene. Only 116 of 396 Ghazanfari genes were detected in BMAC, whereas no cells expressed all of them. No cells express all Jia genes, but 25 cells express at least 13 of 22. No cells express all Silva genes, but 19 cells express at least 8 of 23. Most importantly, the liberalized strategies tended to identify different cells and most of them clustered with immune cells. Conclusion: Currently available methods need to be liberalized to identify any MSCs in fresh human BMAC and lack consensus at the single cell transcriptome and protein expression levels. These different cells should be isolated and challenged to establish phenotypic differences. Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrated that improved strategies to quantify MSC concentrations in BMAC for clinical applications are urgently needed. Until then, injected minimally manipulated MSC doses should be reported as rough estimates or as unknown.

Project description:BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition affecting human body biomechanics and quality of life. Current standard care for knee OA leads to trivial improvement and entails multiple adverse effects or complications. Recently, investigational cell therapies injected intra-articularly, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), have shown safety and therapeutic potency providing patients with pain relief. In the current retrospective comparative study, we investigated the differences in pain and functional improvements in patients with symptomatic knee OA receiving intra-articular injections of BMAC vs PRP.MethodsPain and functionality scores were measured at baseline and at different time points post-injection over 12 months, using 3 self-administered, clinically validated questionnaires: the visual analogue scale (VAS) for assessing pain intensity, the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) for evaluating functionality and knee-related quality of life, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) for evaluating physical function. The repeated-measures general linear model with Sidak test for pairwise comparisons was used to investigate the influence of the treatment on the score evolution within groups (between baseline and each time point) and between groups (overall).ResultsThe BMAC group (n = 26 knees) significantly improved in VAS, KOOS, and WOMAC scores between baseline and 12 months (57.4, 75.88, and 73.95% mean score improvement, respectively). In contrast, the PRP group (n = 13 knees) witnessed nonsignificant improvement in all scores. BMAC, in comparison to PRP, induced significant improvement in outcomes by 29.38% on the VAS scale, 53.89% on the KOOS scale, and 51.71% on the WOMAC scale (P < .002, P < .01, P < .011, respectively).ConclusionsIntra-articular autologous BMAC injections are safe, effective in treating pain, and ameliorate functionality in patients with symptomatic knee OA to a greater extent than PRP injections. Intra-articular autologous BMAC therapy is safe and provides more relief to patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis compared to PRP therapy.

Dataset Information

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: Its Uses in Osteoarthritis.

Publications

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: Its Uses in Osteoarthritis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets