Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Radiomics of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in renal cell carcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:(1) To assess the methodological quality of radiomics studies investigating histological subtypes, therapy response, and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and (2) to determine the risk of bias in these radiomics studies. METHODS:In this systematic review, literature published since 2000 on radiomics in RCC was included and assessed for methodological quality using the Radiomics Quality Score. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool and a meta-analysis of radiomics studies focusing on differentiating between angiomyolipoma without visible fat and RCC was performed. RESULTS:Fifty-seven studies investigating the use of radiomics in renal cancer were identified, including 4590 patients in total. The average Radiomics Quality Score was 3.41 (9.4% of total) with good inter-rater agreement (ICC 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.98). Three studies validated results with an independent dataset, one used a publically available validation dataset. None of the studies shared the code, images, or regions of interest. The meta-analysis showed moderate heterogeneity among the included studies and an odds ratio of 6.24 (95% CI 4.27-9.12; p?

SUBMITTER: Ursprung S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7248043 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Radiomics of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in renal cell carcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ursprung Stephan S   Beer Lucian L   Bruining Annemarie A   Woitek Ramona R   Stewart Grant D GD   Gallagher Ferdia A FA   Sala Evis E  

European radiology 20200214 6


<h4>Objectives</h4>(1) To assess the methodological quality of radiomics studies investigating histological subtypes, therapy response, and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and (2) to determine the risk of bias in these radiomics studies.<h4>Methods</h4>In this systematic review, literature published since 2000 on radiomics in RCC was included and assessed for methodological quality using the Radiomics Quality Score. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10374837 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2709495 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7873602 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10101397 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8322500 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5283725 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7944501 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5591164 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4616540 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6709059 | biostudies-literature