Dataset Information

Paradoxical low-flow phenotype in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Low flow (LF) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a paradox but is associated with worse prognosis. Determinants of LF in HFpEF have not been clarified but their assessment could corroborate recognition and definition of such a paradoxical condition.

Methods

A cohort of 193 patients hospitalized with HFpEF was retrospectively studied and divided in a group with LF (N = 45), defined by a left ventricular (LV) stroke volume index (SVI) < 30 ml/m², and a group with normal flow (N = 148). A small LV cavity was pre-defined as LV end diastolic diameter index (EDDI) below median values (<25 mm/m² for males and <26 mm/m² for females). Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) was defined as the ratio between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and systolic pulmonary artery pressure < 0.36 mm/mmHg. An endpoint of all-cause mortality was evaluated after a median follow-up of 2.4 years.

Results

RVD (OR = 7.4; P < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (AF) during echocardiography (OR = 3.26; P = 0.008), and small LV cavity (OR = 3.81; P = 0.003) were independently associated with LF. After adjusting for age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, renal function, chronic obstructed pulmonary disease, use of ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, moderate tricuspid regurgitation, RVD), LF was associated with mortality (HR = 3.69; P < 0.001) whereas the combination of the determinants of LF was not.

Conclusion

Paradoxical LF in HFpEF is associated with small LV cavity, AF and RVD. None of the combination of different factors associated with LF could substitute direct assessment of LF status in predicting prognosis in this cohort.

SUBMITTER: Mele D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7262439 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Paradoxical low-flow phenotype in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Mele Donato D Pestelli Gabriele G Dal Molin Davide D Fiorencis Andrea A Flamigni Filippo F Luisi Giovanni Andrea GA Smarrazzo Vittorio V Trevisan Filippo F Ferrari Roberto R

International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature 20200528

<h4>Background</h4>Low flow (LF) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a paradox but is associated with worse prognosis. Determinants of LF in HFpEF have not been clarified but their assessment could corroborate recognition and definition of such a paradoxical condition.<h4>Methods</h4>A cohort of 193 patients hospitalized with HFpEF was retrospectively studied and divided in a group with LF (N = 45), defined by a left ventricular (LV) stroke volume index (SVI) < 30 ml/m<s ...[more]

PMID: 32490146

Similar Datasets

Project description:Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF; HFpEF) accounts for 50% of HF cases, and its prevalence relative to HF with reduced EF continues to rise. In contrast to HF with reduced EF, large trials testing neurohumoral inhibition in HFpEF failed to reach a positive outcome. This failure was recently attributed to distinct systemic and myocardial signaling in HFpEF and to diversity of HFpEF phenotypes. In this review, an HFpEF treatment strategy is proposed that addresses HFpEF-specific signaling and phenotypic diversity. In HFpEF, extracardiac comorbidities such as metabolic risk, arterial hypertension, and renal insufficiency drive left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction through systemic inflammation and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction. The latter affects left ventricular diastolic dysfunction through macrophage infiltration, resulting in interstitial fibrosis, and through altered paracrine signaling to cardiomyocytes, which become hypertrophied and stiff because of low nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Systemic inflammation also affects other organs such as lungs, skeletal muscle, and kidneys, leading, respectively, to pulmonary hypertension, muscle weakness, and sodium retention. Individual steps of these signaling cascades can be targeted by specific interventions: metabolic risk by caloric restriction, systemic inflammation by statins, pulmonary hypertension by phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, muscle weakness by exercise training, sodium retention by diuretics and monitoring devices, myocardial nitric oxide bioavailability by inorganic nitrate-nitrite, myocardial cyclic guanosine monophosphate content by neprilysin or phosphodiesterase 9 inhibition, and myocardial fibrosis by spironolactone. Because of phenotypic diversity in HFpEF, personalized therapeutic strategies are proposed, which are configured in a matrix with HFpEF presentations in the abscissa and HFpEF predispositions in the ordinate.

Project description:BackgroundHeart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome. Some patients develop elevated filling pressures exclusively during exercise and never require hospitalization, whereas others periodically develop congestion that requires inpatient treatment. The features differentiating these cohorts are unclear.MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of 7 National Institutes of Health-sponsored multicenter trials of HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%, N = 727). Patients were stratified by history of hospitalization because of HF, comparing patients never hospitalized (HFpEFNH) to those with a prior hospitalization (HFpEFPH). Currently hospitalized (HFpEFCH) patients were included to fill the spectrum. Clinical characteristics, cardiac structure, biomarkers, quality of life, functional capacity, activity levels, and outcomes were compared.ResultsAs expected, HFpEFCH (n = 338) displayed the greatest severity of congestion, as assessed by N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels, edema and orthopnea. As compared to HFpEFNH (n = 109), HFpEFPH (n = 280) displayed greater comorbidity burden, with more lung disease, renal dysfunction and anemia, along with lower activity levels (accelerometry), poorer exercise capacity (6-minute walk distance and peak exercise capacity), and more orthopnea. Patients with current or prior hospitalization displayed higher rates of future HF hospitalization, but quality of life was similarly impaired in all patients with HFpEF, regardless of hospitalization history.ConclusionsA greater burden of noncardiac organ dysfunction, sedentariness, functional impairment, and higher event rates distinguish patients with HFpEF and prior HF hospitalization from those never hospitalized. Despite lower event rates, quality of life is severely and similarly limited in patients with no history of hospitalization. These data suggest that the 2 clinical profiles of HFpEF may require different treatment strategies.

Project description:Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is defined as HF with an ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% and elevated cardiac diastolic filling pressures. The underlying causes of HFpEF are multifactorial and not well-defined. A transgenic mouse with low levels of cardiomyocyte (CM)-specific inducible Cavβ2a expression (β2a-Tg mice) showed increased cytosolic CM Ca2+, and modest levels of CM hypertrophy, and fibrosis. This study aimed to determine if β2a-Tg mice develop an HFpEF phenotype when challenged with two additional stressors, high-fat diet (HFD) and Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME, LN). Four-month-old wild-type (WT) and β2a-Tg mice were given either normal chow (WT-N, β2a-N) or HFD and/or l-NAME (WT-HFD, WT-LN, WT-HFD-LN, β2a-HFD, β2a-LN, and β2a-HFD-LN). Some animals were treated with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) (hypertrophy regulators) inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) (β2a-HFD-LN-SAHA). Echocardiography was performed monthly. After 4 mo of treatment, terminal studies were performed including invasive hemodynamics and organs weight measurements. Cardiac tissue was collected. Four months of HFD plus l-NAME treatment did not induce a profound HFpEF phenotype in FVB WT mice. β2a-HFD-LN (3-Hit) mice developed features of HFpEF, including increased atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) levels, preserved EF, diastolic dysfunction, robust CM hypertrophy, increased M2-macrophage population, and myocardial fibrosis. SAHA reduced the HFpEF phenotype in the 3-Hit mouse model, by attenuating these effects. The 3-Hit mouse model induced a reliable HFpEF phenotype with CM hypertrophy, cardiac fibrosis, and increased M2-macrophage population. This model could be used for identifying and preclinical testing of novel therapeutic strategies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study shows that three independent pathological stressors (increased Ca2+ influx, high-fat diet, and l-NAME) together produce a profound HFpEF phenotype. The primary mechanisms include HDAC-dependent-CM hypertrophy, necrosis, increased M2-macrophage population, fibroblast activation, and myocardial fibrosis. A role for HDAC activation in the HFpEF phenotype was shown in studies with SAHA treatment, which prevented the severe HFpEF phenotype. This "3-Hit" mouse model could be helpful in identifying novel therapeutic strategies to treat HFpEF.

Dataset Information

Paradoxical low-flow phenotype in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Paradoxical low-flow phenotype in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets