Dataset Information

Comparison of Cefepime-Cefpirome and Carbapenem Therapy for Acinetobacter Bloodstream Infection in a Multicenter Study.

ABSTRACT: Carbapenems are currently the preferred agents for the treatment of serious Acinetobacter infections. However, whether cefepime-cefpirome can be used to treat an Acinetobacter bloodstream infection (BSI) if it is active against the causative pathogen(s) is not clear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of cefepime-cefpirome and carbapenem monotherapy in patients with Acinetobacter BSI. The population included 360 patients with monomicrobial Acinetobacter BSI receiving appropriate antimicrobial therapy admitted to four medical centers in Taiwan in 2012 to 2017. The predictors of 30-day mortality were determined by Cox regression analysis. The overall 30-day mortality rate in the appropriate antibiotic treatment group was 25.0% (90/360 patients). The crude 30-day mortality rates for cefepime-cefpirome and carbapenem therapy were 11.5% (7/61 patients) and 26.3% (21/80 patients), respectively. The patients receiving cefepime-cefpirome or carbapenem therapy were infected by Acinetobacter nosocomialis (51.8%), Acinetobacter baumannii (18.4%), and Acinetobacter pittii (12.1%). After adjusting for age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, invasive procedures, and underlying diseases, cefepime-cefpirome therapy was not independently associated with a higher or lower 30-day mortality rate compared to that with the carbapenem therapy. SOFA score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.324; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.137 to 1.543; P?

SUBMITTER: Chang YY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7269511 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of Cefepime-Cefpirome and Carbapenem Therapy for Acinetobacter Bloodstream Infection in a Multicenter Study.

Chang Yea-Yuan YY Yang Ya-Sung YS Wu Shang-Liang SL Wang Yung-Chih YC Chen Te-Li TL Lee Yi-Tzu YT

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 20200521 6

Carbapenems are currently the preferred agents for the treatment of serious Acinetobacter infections. However, whether cefepime-cefpirome can be used to treat an Acinetobacter bloodstream infection (BSI) if it is active against the causative pathogen(s) is not clear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of cefepime-cefpirome and carbapenem monotherapy in patients with Acinetobacter BSI. The population included 360 patients with monomicrobial Acinetobacter BSI rece ...[more]

PMID: 32179523

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). Methods:CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared. Results:Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; P = 0.001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy exerted a protective effect on the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio 0.566, 95% confidence interval (0.342-0.940); P = 0.028]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy was lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (22.2% vs. 40%; P = 0.074). However, the mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin was significantly lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy (P = 0.048). Conclusions:Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest.

Project description:Acinetobacter baumannii is emerging as a leading global multiple-antibiotic-resistant nosocomial pathogen. The identity of genes essential for pathogenesis in a mammalian host remains largely unknown. Using transposon-directed insertion-site sequencing (TraDIS), we identified A. baumannii genes involved in bacterial survival in a leukopenic mouse model of bloodstream infection. Mice were inoculated with a pooled transposon mutant library derived from 109,000 mutants, and TraDIS was used to map transposon insertion sites in the genomes of bacteria in the inoculum and of bacteria recovered from mouse spleens. Unique transposon insertion sites were mapped and used to calculate a fitness factor for every insertion site based on its relative abundance in the inoculum and postinfection libraries. Eighty-nine transposon insertion mutants that were underrepresented after experimental infection in mice compared to their presence in the inocula were delineated as candidates for further evaluation. Genetically defined mutants lacking feoB (ferrous iron import), ddc (d-ala-d-ala-carboxypeptidase), and pntB (pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase subunit) exhibited a fitness defect during systemic infection resulting from bacteremia. In vitro, these mutants, as well as a fepA (ferric enterobactin receptor) mutant, are defective in survival in human serum and within macrophages and are hypersensitive to killing by antimicrobial peptides compared to the survival of the parental strain under these conditions. Our data demonstrate that FepA is involved in the uptake of exogenous enterobactin in A. baumannii. Genetic complementation rescues the phenotypes of mutants in assays that emulate conditions encountered during infection. In summary, we have determined novel A. baumannii fitness genes involved in the pathogenesis of mammalian infection. IMPORTANCE A. baumannii is a significant cause of bacterial bloodstream infection in humans. Since multiple antibiotic resistance is becoming more common among strains of A. baumannii, there is an urgent need to develop novel tools to treat infections caused by this dangerous pathogen. To develop knowledge-guided treatment approaches for A. baumannii, a thorough understanding of the mechanism by which this pathogen causes bloodstream infection is required. Here, using a mouse model of infection, we report the identification of A. baumannii genes that are critical for the ability of this pathogen to cause bloodstream infections. This study lays the foundation for future research on A. baumannii genes that can be targeted to develop novel therapeutics against this emerging human pathogen.

Project description:BackgroundRalstonia picketti, Ralstonia mannitolilytica, and Ralstonia insidiosa have recently been regarded as emerging pathogens of infectious diseases, in particular as the pathogens responsible for nosocomial infection in immunocompromised patients. R. insidiosa differs from R. picketti and R. mannitolilytica, and its related infections are rarely reported.MethodsClinical data from two nosocomial bloodstream infection cases were extracted and analyzed. The causable isolates were identified by the VITEK 2 Compact system, matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and molecular identification methods using PCR with universal and species-specific primers. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the broth microdilution method. Both of the isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing using a HiSeq X10 Sequencer. Antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence factors, and plasmid replicons were identified from assembled genomes. A real-time RT-PCR experiment and a cloning experiment were conducted to explore the related class D β-lactamase-encoding genes.ResultsBoth patients recovered under therapy with antibiotics. Isolates were initially misidentified as R. mannitolilytica by the VITEK 2 Compact system rather than R. insidiosa, as identified by both MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Both isolates were resistant to aminoglycosides, β-lactams, and polymyxin B. One isolate harboring blaOXA-570 was resistant to carbapenems. The whole genome sequencing data confirmed species identification based on average nucleotide identity (ANI) and revealed two variants of class D β-lactamase-encoding gene blaOXA (blaOXA-573 and blaOXA-574). The real-time RT-PCR experiment showed no difference in gene expression between blaOXA-570 and blaOXA-573 in our strains. The cloning experiment showed that variant OXA-573 had no carbapenem hydrolase activity.ConclusionsWe described two cases of nosocomial bloodstream infection caused by R. insidiosa strains. MALDI-TOF MS was cost-effective for rapid species identification. Clinicians should be aware that R. insidiosa can be resistant to commonly used antibiotics, even carbapenems.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Cefepime-Cefpirome and Carbapenem Therapy for Acinetobacter Bloodstream Infection in a Multicenter Study.

Publications

Comparison of Cefepime-Cefpirome and Carbapenem Therapy for Acinetobacter Bloodstream Infection in a Multicenter Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets