Dataset Information

Identification of gene expression and DNA methylation of SERPINA5 and TIMP1 as novel prognostic markers in lower-grade gliomas.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) is characteristic with great difference in prognosis. Due to limited prognostic biomarkers, it is urgent to identify more molecular markers to provide a more objective and accurate tumor classification system for LGGs.

Methods

In the current study, we performed an integrated analysis of gene expression data and genome-wide methylation data to determine novel prognostic genes and methylation sites in LGGs.

Results

To determine genes that differentially expressed between 44 short-term survivors (<2 years) and 48 long-term survivors (≥2 years), we searched LGGs TCGA RNA-seq dataset and identified 106 differentially expressed genes. SERPINA5 and TIMP1 were selected for further study. Kaplan-Meier plots showed that SERPINA5 and TIMP1 expression were significantly correlated with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in TCGA LGGs patients. We next validated the correlation between the candidate genes expression and clinical outcome in CGGA LGGs patients. Multivariate analysis showed that TIMP1 mRNA expression had a significant prognostic value independent of other variables (HR = 4.825, 95% CI = 1.370-17.000, P = 0.014). Then, differential methylation sites were identified from differentially candidate gene expression groups, and all four methylation sites were significantly negatively correlated with gene expression (spearman r < - 0.5, P < 0.0001). Moreover, hyper-methylation of four methylation sites indicated better OS (P < 0.05), and three of them also shown statistical significantly association with better RFS, except for SERPINA5 cg15509705 (P = 0.0762).

Conclusion

Taken together, these findings indicated that the gene expression and methylation of SERPINA5 and TIMP1 may serve as prognostic predictors in LGGs and may help to precise the current histology-based tumors classification system and to provide better stratification for future clinical trials.

SUBMITTER: Zeng WJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7275683 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhile molecular insights to diffuse lower-grade glioma (dLGG) have improved the basis for prognostication, most established clinical prognostic factors come from the pre-molecular era. For instance, WHO grade as a predictor for survival in dLGG with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation has recently been questioned. We studied the prognostic role of WHO grade in molecularly defined subgroups and evaluated earlier used prognostic factors in the current molecular setting.Material and methodsA total of 253 adults with morphological dLGG, consecutively included between 2007 and 2018, were assessed. IDH mutations, codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p/19q, and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions were analyzed.ResultsThere was no survival benefit for patients with WHO grade 2 over grade 3 IDH-mut dLGG after exclusion of tumors with known CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (n=157) (log-rank p=0.97). This was true also after stratification for oncological postoperative treatment and when astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas were analyzed separately. In IDH-mut astrocytomas, residual tumor volume after surgery was an independent prognostic factor for survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p=0.003), but not in oligodendrogliomas (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p=0.15). Preoperative tumor size was an independent predictor in both astrocytomas (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p=0.02) and oligodendrogliomas (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p=0.01). Age was not a significant prognostic factor in multivariable analyses (astrocytomas p=0.64, oligodendrogliomas p=0.08).ConclusionOur findings suggest that WHO grade is not a robust prognostic factor in molecularly well-defined dLGG. Preoperative tumor size remained a prognostic factor in both IDH-mut astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas in our cohort, whereas residual tumor volume predicted prognosis in IDH-mut astrocytomas only. The age cutoffs for determining high risk in patients with IDH-mut dLGG from the pre-molecular era are not supported by our results.