Dataset Information

Gait Analysis Comparing Kinematic, Kinetic, and Muscle Activation Data of Modern and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To provide normal knee function, a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant with an anatomic surface shape and an adequate sagittal position has been developed. However, it is unclear how this modern implant influences knee joint kinetics and muscle activation during a gait. Therefore, we evaluated this modern TKA prosthesis and compared it with a conventional TKA prosthesis for gait analysis in terms of kinetics and muscle activation.

Methods

Subjects were patients (>60 years of age) with knee osteoarthritis who had undergone unilateral TKA. Twelve patients received the modern TKA prosthesis (group modern), and the other 12 patients received a conventional TKA prosthesis (group conventional). The subjects underwent motion capture analyses with a force plate, and kinematic and kinetic data were acquired from a 10-m gait test. Electromyography data of 6 lower limb muscles were simultaneously collected during the gait test. The 2 groups were compared using unpaired t-tests.

Results

In group modern, gait speed was faster, step length was longer, and the knee flexion angle during the initial stance phase was larger. Furthermore, in group modern, the maximum knee extension moment was higher; however, the quadriceps muscle activity tended to be lower than that in group conventional.

Conclusions

Gait characteristics of group modern were more like a normal gait, and knee joint extension moments were greater. This finding indicates that the quadriceps muscles can be more effectively activated, and the anterior stability function of the anterior cruciate ligament may be reproduced with the shape of the modern implant.

SUBMITTER: Hyodo K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7280752 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsThe mid-term results of kinematic alignment (KA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using image derived instrumentation (IDI) have not been reported in detail, and questions remain regarding ligamentous stability and revisions. This paper aims to address the following: 1) what is the distribution of alignment of KA TKAs using IDI; 2) is a TKA alignment category associated with increased risk of failure or poor patient outcomes; 3) does extending limb alignment lead to changes in soft-tissue laxity; and 4) what is the five-year survivorship and outcomes of KA TKA using IDI?MethodsA prospective, multicentre, trial enrolled 100 patients undergoing KA TKA using IDI, with follow-up to five years. Alignment measures were conducted pre- and postoperatively to assess constitutional alignment and final implant position. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain and function were also included. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry was used to assess survivorship.ResultsThe postoperative HKA distribution varied from 9° varus to 11° valgus. All PROMs showed statistical improvements at one year (p < 0.001), with further improvements at five years for Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms (p = 0.041) and Forgotten Joint Score (p = 0.011). Correlation analysis showed no difference (p = 0.610) between the hip-knee-ankle and joint line congruence angle at one and five years. Sub-group analysis showed no difference in PROMs for patients placed within 3° of neutral compared to those placed > 3°. There were no revisions for tibial loosening; however, there were reports of a higher incidence of poor patella tracking and patellofemoral stiffness.ConclusionPROMs were not impacted by postoperative alignment category. Ligamentous stability was maintained at five years with joint line obliquity. There were no revisions for tibial loosening despite a significant portion of tibiae placed in varus; however, KA executed with IDI resulted in a higher than anticipated rate of patella complications.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):656-665.