Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Prognostic role of high cathepsin D expression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Background

High cathepsin D has been associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer; however, the results of many studies are controversial. Here, we assessed the association between high cathepsin D levels and worse breast cancer prognosis by conducting a meta-analysis.

Methods

A comprehensive search strategy was used to search relevant literature in PUBMED and EMBASE by September 2018. The meta-analysis was performed in Review Manager 5.3 using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 15,355 breast cancer patients from 26 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. Significant associations between elevated high cathepsin D and poor overall survival (OS) (HR?=?1.61, 95% CI: 1.35-1.92, p?p?p?p?p?p?p?=?0.04) and a high risk of relapse when their cathepsin D levels were low (HR?=?1.50, 95% CI: 1.22-1.85, p?=?0.0001).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis suggests that high expression levels of cathepsin D are associated with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Based on our subgroup analysis, we believe that cathepsin D can act as a marker for poor breast cancer prognosis and also as a therapeutic target for breast cancer.

SUBMITTER: Kang J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7281710 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Prognostic role of high cathepsin D expression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kang Junho J   Yu Yeuni Y   Jeong Seongdo S   Lee Hansong H   Heo Hye Jin HJ   Park Jeong Jun JJ   Na Hee Sam HS   Ko Dai Sik DS   Kim Yun Hak YH  

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 20200608


<h4>Background</h4>High cathepsin D has been associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer; however, the results of many studies are controversial. Here, we assessed the association between high cathepsin D levels and worse breast cancer prognosis by conducting a meta-analysis.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive search strategy was used to search relevant literature in PUBMED and EMBASE by September 2018. The meta-analysis was performed in Review Manager 5.3 using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% conf  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8656531 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6935258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8560464 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9352848 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10635791 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6494364 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9661812 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6310576 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7227264 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7378698 | biostudies-literature