Dataset Information

Deeper Central Reaming May Enhance Initial Acetabular Shell Fixation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The initial stability of press-fit acetabular components is partially determined by the reaming technique. Nonhemispherical (NHS) acetabular shells, which have a larger radius at the rim than the dome, often require larger reaming preparations than the same-sized hemispherical (HS) shells. Furthermore, deeper central reaming may provide a more stable press fit. Using a reproducible, in vitro protocol, we compared initial shell stability under different reaming techniques with HS and NHS acetabular components.

Methods

Cavities for 54-mm NHS and 56-mm HS acetabular components were premachined in 20-pcf Sawbones blocks. Acetabular cavities included diameters of 54, 55, "54+," and "55+". "+" indicates a cavity with a 2-mm smaller diameter that is 2-mm deeper. A 4750N statically applied force seated shells to a height that was comparable with shell height after an orthopaedic surgeon's manual impaction. Force required to dislodge shells was assessed via a straight torque-out with a linear load.

Results

Increased preparation depth (+) was associated with deeper shell seating in all groups. Deeper central reaming increased required lever-out force for all groups. Overall, HS and NHS implants prepared with 55 + preparation had the highest lever-out forces, although this was not significantly higher than those with 54+.

Conclusions

In 20-pcf Sawbones, representing dense bone, overreaming depth by 1-mm improved initial seating measurements. In both HS and NHS acetabular shells, seating depth and required lever-out force were higher in the "+" category. It is unclear, however, whether a decreased diameter ream increased seating stability (55+ vs 54+). Clinically, this deeper central reaming technique may help initial acetabular stability.

SUBMITTER: Hickernell TR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7286971 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Geriatric acetabular fractures require fixation with sufficient primary stability to allow for immediate full-weight bearing. Minimally-invasive procedures would be desirable in order to keep perioperative morbidity low. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical strength of lag screw-only fixation of anterior column posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) acetabular fractures to standard anatomical plate fixation. METHODS:Standardized ACPHT fractures were created in fourth generation synthetic pelvis models and stabilized by either an anatomical buttress plate (n?=?4) or by a screw-only construct (n?=?4). In a validated setup, a cyclic loading protocol was applied with increasing axial force (3200?cycles, 175?N to 2250?N). Construct survival, acetabular fracture motion, and mode of failure were assessed. RESULTS:The median number of cycles needed until failure of the construct occurred was 2304?cycles (range, 2020 to 2675) in the plate fixation group and 3200?cycles (range, 3101 to 3200) for the screw fixation constructs (p?=?.003). With regard to energy absorbed until failure, the plate fixation group resisted to 1.57?×?106?N*cycles (range, 1.21?×?106 to 2.14?×?106) and the screw fixation group to 3.17?×?106?N*cycles (range, 2.92?×?106 to 3.17?×?106; p?=?.001). All plate fixation specimens failed with a break-out of the posterior-column screw in the quadrilateral wing of the anatomical plate within a maximum load of 1750?N while the screw fixation constructs all survived loading of at least 2100?N. Acetabular fracture gap motion, acetabular rim angle, and medial femoral head subluxation as measures of fracture displacement were all not different between the two groups (p?>?0.1). CONCLUSIONS:In this in vitro biomechanical study, screw-only fixation of an ACPHT acetabular fracture resulted in at least as good construct survival as seen for standard buttress plate fixation. Both methods resisted sufficiently to forces that would be expected under physiologic conditions.

Project description:BackgroundAcetabular fractures still are among the most challenging fractures to treat because of complex anatomy, involved surgical access to fracture sites and the relatively low incidence of these lesions. Proper evaluation and surgical planning is necessary to achieve anatomic reduction of the articular surface and stable fixation of the pelvic ring. The goal of this study was to test the feasibility of preoperative surgical planning in acetabular fractures using a new prototype planning tool based on an interactive virtual reality-style environment.Methods7 patients (5 male and 2 female; median age 53 y (25 to 92 y)) with an acetabular fracture were prospectively included. Exclusion criterions were simple wall fractures, cases with anticipated surgical dislocation of the femoral head for joint debridement and accurate fracture reduction. According to the Letournel classification 4 cases had two column fractures, 2 cases had anterior column fractures and 1 case had a T-shaped fracture including a posterior wall fracture.The workflow included following steps: (1) Formation of a patient-specific bone model from preoperative computed tomography scans, (2) interactive virtual fracture reduction with visuo-haptic feedback, (3) virtual fracture fixation using common osteosynthesis implants and (4) measurement of implant position relative to landmarks. The surgeon manually contoured osteosynthesis plates preoperatively according to the virtually defined deformation. Screenshots including all measurements for the OR were available.The tool was validated comparing the preoperative planning and postoperative results by 3D-superimposition.ResultsPreoperative planning was feasible in all cases. In 6 of 7 cases superimposition of preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up CT showed a good to excellent correlation. In one case part of the procedure had to be changed due to impossibility of fracture reduction from an ilioinguinal approach. In 3 cases with osteopenic bone patient-specific prebent fixation plates were helpful in guiding fracture reduction. Additionally, anatomical landmark based measurements were helpful for intraoperative navigation.ConclusionThe presented prototype planning tool for pelvic surgery was successfully integrated in a clinical workflow to improve patient-specific preoperative planning, giving visual and haptic information about the injury and allowing a patient-specific adaptation of osteosynthesis implants to the virtually reduced pelvis.