Dataset Information

Removal of high frequency contamination from motion estimates in single-band fMRI saves data without biasing functional connectivity.

ABSTRACT: Denoising fMRI data requires assessment of frame-to-frame head motion and removal of the biases motion introduces. This is usually done through analysis of the parameters calculated during retrospective head motion correction (i.e., 'motion' parameters). However, it is increasingly recognized that respiration introduces factitious head motion via perturbations of the main (B0) field. This effect appears as higher-frequency fluctuations in the motion parameters (>0.1 Hz, here referred to as 'HF-motion'), primarily in the phase-encoding direction. This periodicity can sometimes be obscured in standard single-band fMRI (TR 2.0-2.5 s) due to aliasing. Here we examined (1) how prevalent HF-motion effects are in seven single-band datasets with TR from 2.0 to 2.5 s and (2) how HF-motion affects functional connectivity. We demonstrate that HF-motion is more common in older adults, those with higher body mass index, and those with lower cardiorespiratory fitness. We propose a low-pass filtering approach to remove the contamination of high frequency effects from motion summary measures, such as framewise displacement (FD). We demonstrate that in most datasets this filtering approach saves a substantial amount of data from FD-based frame censoring, while at the same time reducing motion biases in functional connectivity measures. These findings suggest that filtering motion parameters is an effective way to improve the fidelity of head motion estimates, even in single band datasets. Particularly large data savings may accrue in datasets acquired in older and less fit participants.

SUBMITTER: Gratton C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7308220 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Functional connectivity analysis of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) plays an important role in understanding the mechanism of epilepsy and seizure dynamics. However, existing connectivity analysis is only suitable for low-frequency bands below 80 Hz. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and high-frequency activity (HFA) in the high-frequency band (80-500 Hz) are thought to be specific biomarkers in epileptic tissue localization. However, the transience in duration and variability of occurrence time and amplitudes of these events pose a challenge for conducting effective connectivity analysis. To deal with this problem, we proposed skewness-based functional connectivity (SFC) in the high-frequency band and explored its utility in epileptic tissue localization and surgical outcome evaluation. SFC comprises three main steps. The first step is the quantitative measurement of amplitude distribution asymmetry between HFOs/HFA and baseline activity. The second step is functional network construction on the basis of rank correlation of asymmetry across time. The third step is connectivity strength extraction from the functional network. Experiments were conducted in two separate datasets which consist of iEEG recordings from 59 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Significant difference (p<0.001) in connectivity strength was found between epileptic and non-epileptic tissue. Results were quantified via the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC). Compared with low-frequency bands, SFC demonstrated superior performance. With respect to pooled and individual epileptic tissue localization for seizure-free patients, AUCs were 0.66 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.69) and (0.63 95% CI 0.56-0.71), respectively. For surgical outcome classification, the AUC was 0.75 (95% CI 0.59-0.85). Therefore, SFC can act as a promising assessment tool in characterizing the epileptic network and potentially provide better treatment options for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Project description:The influence of global BOLD fluctuations on resting state functional connectivity in fMRI data remains a topic of debate, with little consensus. In this study, we assessed the effects of global signal regression (GSR) on effective connectivity within and between resting state networks (RSNs) - as estimated with dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for resting state fMRI (rsfMRI). DCM incorporates a forward (generative) model that quantifies the contribution of different types of noise (including global measurement noise), effective connectivity, and (neuro)vascular processes to functional connectivity measurements. DCM analyses were applied to two different designs; namely, longitudinal and cross-sectional designs. In the modelling of longitudinal designs, we considered four extensive longitudinal resting state fMRI datasets with a total number of 20 subjects. In the analysis of cross-sectional designs, we used rsfMRI data from 361 subjects from the Human Connectome Project. We hypothesized that (1) GSR would have no discernible impact on effective connectivity estimated with DCM, and (2) GSR would be reflected in the parameters representing global measurement noise. Additionally, we performed comparative analyses of information gain with and without GSR. Our results showed negligible to small effects of GSR on effective connectivity within small (separately estimated) RSNs. However, although the effect sizes were small, there was substantial to conclusive evidence for an effect of GSR on connectivity parameters. For between-network connectivity, we found two important effects: the effect of GSR on between-network effective connectivity (averaged over all connections) was negligible to small, while the effect of GSR on individual connections was non-negligible. In the cross-sectional (but not in the longitudinal) data, some connections showed substantial to conclusive evidence for an effect of GSR. Contrary to our expectations, we found either no effect (in the longitudinal designs) or a non-specific (cross-sectional design) effect of GSR on parameters characterising (global) measurement noise. Data without GSR were found to be more informative than data with GSR; however, in small resting state networks the precision of posterior estimates was greater after GSR. In conclusion, GSR is a minor concern in DCM studies; however, quantitative interpretation of between-network connections (as opposed to average between-network connectivity) and noise parameters should be treated with some caution. The Kullback-Leibler divergence of the posterior from the prior (i.e., information gain) - together with the precision of posterior estimates - might offer a useful measure to assess the appropriateness of GSR in resting state fMRI.

Dataset Information

Removal of high frequency contamination from motion estimates in single-band fMRI saves data without biasing functional connectivity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets