Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonist on post-TAVI patients: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been a favored option for the patient who suffered from symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, the efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus Vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) for post-TAVI patients are still controversial. This meta-analysis aims at comparing the clinical outcome and safety of NOACs and VKA in the patients after receiving TAVI.

Method

We searched literature articles in all reachable databases, and observational study as well as randomized controlled trial would be included in order to perform a comprehensive analysis. All-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, disabling or nondisabling stroke were main pooled outcome measures. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were adopted to explore heterogeneity. Assessment of bias was performed under the suggestion of Cochrane's Collaboration Tool.

Results

We collected 3841 non-duplicate citations from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov, and eventually 7 studies were included for this meta-analysis. As a result, VKA showed priority against NOACs in the field of anti-thromboembolism (4435 participants, RR:1.44, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.99, I² = 0%, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

With corroborative analysis of severe complications, VKA is shown to be more protective on post-TAVI patients in disabling or nondisabling stroke scenario but not in mortality or bleeding event.

SUBMITTER: Liang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7318737 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonist on post-TAVI patients: a meta-analysis.

Liang Hongbin H He Qiyu Q Zhang Qiuxia Q Liu Xuewei X Cui Kai K Chen Guojun G Xiu Jiancheng J

BMC cardiovascular disorders 20200626 1

<h4>Background</h4>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been a favored option for the patient who suffered from symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, the efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus Vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) for post-TAVI patients are still controversial. This meta-analysis aims at comparing the clinical outcome and safety of NOACs and VKA in the patients after receiving TAVI.<h4>Method</h4>We searched literature articles in all reachab ...[more]

PMID: 32586273

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundUse of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is endorsed by current guidelines for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients undergoing catheter ablation (RFCA) of AF has not been well established yet.ObjectivesTo perform a meta-analysis of all studies comparing NOACs and vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (VKAs) in patients undergoing RFCA.Data sourcesStudies were searched for in PubMed and Google Scholar databases.Study eligibility criteriaStudies were considered eligible if: they evaluated the clinical impact of NOACs versus VKAs; they specifically analyzed the use of anticoagulants during periprocedural phase of RFCA; they reported clinical outcome data.Study appraisal and synthesis methods25 studies were selected, including 9881 cases. The summary measure used was the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The random-effects or the fixed effect model were used to synthesize results from the selected studies.ResultsThere was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications (RR 1.39; p=0.13). Bleeding complications were significantly lower in the NOACs-treated arm as compared to VKAs (RR=0.67, p<0.001). Interestingly, a larger number of thromboembolic events was found in the VKAs-treated arm in those studies where VKAs had been interrupted during the periprocedural phase (RR=0.68; p=ns). In this same subgroup a significantly higher incidence of both minor (RR=0.54; p=0.002) and major bleeding (RR=0.41; p=0.01) events was recorded. Conversely, the incidence of thromboembolic events in the VKAs-treated arm was significantly lower in those studies with uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation treatment (RR=1.89; p=0.02).LimitationsAs with every meta-analysis, no patients-level data were available.Conclusions and implicationsThe use of NOACs in patients undergoing RFCA is safe, given the lower incidence of bleedings observed with NOACs. On the other side, periprocedural interruption of VKAs and bridging with heparin is associated with a higher bleeding rate with no significant benefit on onset of thromboembolic events.

Project description:ObjectiveSeveral trials had compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin for acute venous thromboembolism, but the results were incomplete. This updated review comprehensively assessed the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism.DesignMeta-analysis of randomised control trials. Six databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2018.SettingAdult patients had got non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin for venous thromboembolism.ParticipantsRandomised control trials that compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin.Main outcome measuresThe efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants .ResultsSeven studies involving 29,879 cases were included, among which 14,943 cases were assigned to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group and 14,936 cases to warfarin group. Meta-analysis showed that compared with warfarin, recurrent venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.11]), death related to venous thromboembolism or fatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.60]), symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (odds ratio 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.09]), symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.03 [(95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.30]) and all deaths (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.12]) are similar in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, but major bleeding event (odds ratio 0.61 [95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.75]) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding event (odds ratio [95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.85]) are less in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group. .ConclusionsFor the treatment of venous thromboembolism, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is as effective as warfarin, and has a better safety profile than warfarin.

Project description:BackgroundClinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In a French nationwide registry study of patients on chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use vs approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA).MethodsData on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using propensity score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA.ResultsA total of 8954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 1.7 (0.8-3.2) years, 2567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA {weighted hazard ratio (wHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.66 (0.46; 0.94)}. A non-significant trend toward a lower risk of major bleeding events was found in DOAC-treated patients, relative to VKA-treated patients [wHR (95% CI) 0.68 (0.41; 1.12)]. The results were consistent across subgroups and in sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsIn a large group of dialysis patients initiating an oral anticoagulant, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events and a non-significantly lower risk of bleeding, relative to VKA use. This provides reassurance regarding the off-label use of DOACs in people on dialysis.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonist on post-TAVI patients: a meta-analysis.

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonist on post-TAVI patients: a meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets