Dataset Information

Did Osteoblastic Cell Therapy Improve the Prognosis of Pre-fracture Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head? A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In patients with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), implantation of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) could delay the progression of osteonecrosis and improve symptoms in pre-fracture ONFH. However, the BMAC content, especially in osteoblastic stem cells, could have an important individual variability. An autologous osteoblastic cell product could improve the effect of such cell-based therapy.

Questions/purposes

(1) Does autologous osteoblastic cell therapy decrease the likelihood of progression to subchondral fracture with or without early collapse corresponding to Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification Stage III or higher, and provide a clinically important pain improvement compared with BMAC treatment alone? (2) Were patients treated with osteoblastic cell therapy less likely to undergo subsequent THA? (3) What proportion of patients in the treatment and control groups experienced adverse events after surgery?

Methods

Between 2004 and 2011, we treated 279 patients for Stage I to II hip osteonecrosis (ON) with surgery. During that time, our general indications for surgery in this setting included non-fracture ON lesions. To be eligible for this randomized, single-blind trial, patients needed to have an ONFH Stage I or II; we excluded those with traumatic ONFH, hemoglobinopathies and positive serology for hepatitis B, C or HIV. Of those treated surgically for this diagnosis during the study period, 24% (67) agreed to participate in this randomized trial. Hips with pre-fracture ONFH were randomly treated with a core decompression procedure associated with either implantation of a BMAC (BMAC group; n = 26) or osteoblastic cell (osteoblastic cell group; n = 30). The groups were not different in terms of clinical and imaging characteristics. The primary study outcome was treatment response, defined as the absence of progression to subchondral fracture stage (ARCO stage III or higher) plus a clinically important pain improvement defined as 1 cm on a 10-cm VAS. The secondary endpoint of interest was the frequency in each group of subsequent THA and the frequency of adverse events. The follow-up duration was 36 months. We used an as-treated analysis (rather than intention-to-treat) for our efficacy endpoint, and an intention-to-treat analysis for adverse events. Overall, 26 of 26 patients in the BMAC group and 27 of 30 in the osteoblastic cell group completed the trial.

Results

At 36 months, no clinically important differences were found in any study endpoint. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had progressed to fracture (ARCO stage III or higher; 46% of the BMAC hips [12 of 26] versus 22% in the hips with osteoblastic cells [six of 27], hazard ratio, 0.47 [95% CI 0.17 to 1.31]; p = 0.15). There was no clinically important difference in VAS pain scores. No differences were found for either the WOMAC or the Lequesne indexes. With the numbers available, there was no difference in the proportion of patients in the groups who underwent THA at 36 months 15% (four of 27) with osteoblastic cells versus 35% (nine of 26) with BMAC; p = 0.09 With the numbers available, we found no differences between the treatment and control groups in terms of the frequencies of major adverse events.

Conclusions

We found no benefit to osteoblastic cells over BMAC in patients with pre-collapse ONFH; side effects were uncommon and generally mild in both groups. This study could be used as pilot data to help determine sample sizes for larger (presumably multicenter) randomized controlled trials. However, this novel treatment cannot be recommended in routine practice until future, larger studies demonstrate efficacy.

Level of evidence

Level II, therapeutic study.

SUBMITTER: Hauzeur JP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7319372 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe absolute number of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is increasing; however, the prediction of traumatic femoral head necrosis remains difficult. Machine learning algorithms have the potential to be superior to traditional prediction methods for the prediction of traumatic femoral head necrosis.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to use machine learning to construct a model for the analysis of risk factors and prediction of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in patients with FNF after internal fixation.MethodsWe retrospectively collected preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical data of patients with FNF in 4 hospitals in Shanghai and followed up the patients for more than 2.5 years. A total of 259 patients with 43 variables were included in the study. The data were randomly divided into a training set (181/259, 69.8%) and a validation set (78/259, 30.1%). External data (n=376) were obtained from a retrospective cohort study of patients with FNF in 3 other hospitals. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and the support vector machine algorithm were used for variable selection. Logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were used to develop the model on the training set. The validation set was used to tune the model hyperparameters to determine the final prediction model, and the external data were used to compare and evaluate the model performance. We compared the accuracy, discrimination, and calibration of the models to identify the best machine learning algorithm for predicting ONFH. Shapley additive explanations and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations were used to determine the interpretability of the black box model.ResultsA total of 11 variables were selected for the models. The XGBoost model performed best on the validation set and external data. The accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model on the validation set were 0.987, 0.929, and 0.992, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model on the external data were 0.907, 0.807, 0.935, and 0.933, respectively, and the log-loss was 0.279. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between the predicted probability and actual risk. The interpretability of the features and individual predictions were realized using the Shapley additive explanations and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations algorithms. In addition, the XGBoost model was translated into a self-made web-based risk calculator to estimate an individual's probability of ONFH.ConclusionsMachine learning performs well in predicting ONFH after internal fixation of FNF. The 6-variable XGBoost model predicted the risk of ONFH well and had good generalization ability on the external data, which can be used for the clinical prediction of ONFH after internal fixation of FNF.

Project description:ObjectivesAutologous peripheral blood stem cell (auto-PBSC) transplantation is an effective therapeutic for the osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) but without prognosis estimation. This study mainly aimed to (1) determine whether auto-PBSC transplantation is a promising option, (2) assess the risk of hip-preservation failure, (3) achieve a predictive model of femoral head survival after the intervention, and (4) eventually identify clinical indications for auto-PBSC transplantation in future.MethodsAfter reviewing the in-patient database of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University from June 2012 to June 2014, 37 eligible patients with Association Research Circulation Osseous stage I or II ONFH who were receiving intra-arterial infusion of auto-PBSCs were recruited. A case form was designed to retrieve relevant data. Hip-preservation failure was defined as the endpoint. All participants were stratified by the categorical risk of collapse, which was statistically tested through log-rank analysis. All significant factors were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression model, and a predictive nomogram plot was generated.ResultsIn total, 47 hips were followed up for 53.96 ± 21.09 months; the median survival time was 60.18 months. Among the predictors, body mass index (BMI; P = 0.0015) and Harris hip score (HHS; P < 0.0001) independently affected femoral head survival. Patients with BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 exhibited a 2.58 times higher risk of hip-preservation failure [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-5.45] than those with BMI < 24 kg/m2, whereas those with HHS ≥ 70 exhibited a 0.19 times lower risk (95% CI, 0.09-0.38) than those with HHS < 70. Hazard ratios associated with age (P = 0.042), BMI (P = 0.012), HHS (P = 0.022), and necrotic volume (P = 0.000) were 1.038 (95% CI, 1.001-1.075), 1.379 (95% CI, 1.072-1.773), 0.961 (95% CI, 0.928-0.994), and 1.258 (95% CI, 1.120-1.412), respectively. A nomogram plot (score test P = 0.000; C-index = 0.8863) was available for the orthopedic doctor to predict hip survival probability.ConclusionsThe results suggest that intra-arterial infusion of auto-PBSCs prolongs femoral head survival. Age, BMI, HHS, and necrotic volume can influence the efficacy of this intervention. This study was approved by ethics committee of the trial center, number 2019-KL-075-01.

Project description:BackgroundGlucocorticoid usage and alcohol abuse are the most widely accepted risk factors for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH). Despite distinct etiologies between glucocorticoid-associated ONFH (GONFH) and alcohol-associated ONFH (AONFH), little is known about the differences of the microarchitectural and histomorphologic characteristics between these subtypes of ONFH.PurposesTo investigate bone microarchitecture, bone remodeling activity and histomorphology characteristics of different regions in femoral heads between GONFH and AONFH.MethodsFrom September 2015 to October 2020, 85 patients diagnosed with GONFH and AONFH were recruited. Femoral heads were obtained after total hip replacement. Femoral head specimens were obtained from 42 patients (50 hips) with GONFH and 43 patients (50 hips) with AONFH. Micro-CT was utilized to assess the microstructure of 9 regions of interest (ROIs) in the femoral head. Along the supero-inferior orientation, the femoral head was divided into necrotic region, reactive interface, and normal region; along the medio-lateral orientation, the femoral head was divided into medial region, central region and lateral region. Decalcified and undecalcified bone histology was subsequently performed to evaluate histopathological alterations and bone remodeling levels.ResultsIn the necrotic region, most of the microarchitectural parameters did not differ significantly between GONFH and AONFH, whereas both the reactive interface and normal region revealed a less sclerotic microarchitecture but a higher bone remodeling level in GONFH than AONFH. Despite similar necrotic pathological manifestations, subchondral trabecular microfracture in the necrotic region was more severe and vasculature of the reactive interface was more abundant in GONFH.ConclusionsGONFH and AONFH shared similar microarchitecture and histopathological features in the necrotic region, while GONFH exhibited a less sclerotic microarchitecture and a more active bone metabolic status in both the reactive interface and normal region. These differences between GONFH and AONFH in bone microarchitectural and histopathological characteristics might contribute to the development of disease-modifying prevention strategies and treatments for ONFH, taking into etiologies.