Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Clinical outcome measures and scoring systems used in prospective studies of port wine stains: A systematic review.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Valid and reliable outcome measures are needed to determine and compare treatment results of port wine stain (PWS) studies. Besides, uniformity in outcome measures is crucial to enable inter-study comparisons and meta-analyses. This study aimed to assess the heterogeneity in reported PWS outcome measures by mapping the (clinical) outcome measures currently used in prospective PWS studies. METHODS:OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for prospective PWS studies published from 2005 to May 2020. Interventional studies with a clinical efficacy assessment were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated methodological quality using a modified Downs and Black checklist. RESULTS:In total, 85 studies comprising 3,310 patients were included in which 94 clinician/observer-reported clinical efficacy assessments had been performed using 46 different scoring systems. Eighty-one- studies employed a global assessment of PWS appearance/improvement, of which -82% was expressed as percentage improvement and categorized in 26 different scoring systems. A wide variety of other global and multi-item scoring systems was identified. As a result of outcome heterogeneity and insufficient data reporting, only 44% of studies could be directly compared. A minority of studies included patient-reported or objective outcomes. Thirteen studies of good quality were found. CONCLUSION:Clinical PWS outcomes are highly heterogeneous, which hampers study comparisons and meta-analyses. Consensus-based development of a core outcome-set would benefit future research and clinical practice, especially considering the lack of high-quality trials.

SUBMITTER: van Raath MI 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7332045 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Clinical outcome measures and scoring systems used in prospective studies of port wine stains: A systematic review.

van Raath M Ingmar MI   Chohan Sandeep S   Wolkerstorfer Albert A   van der Horst Chantal M A M CMAM   Limpens Jacqueline J   Huang Xuan X   Ding Baoyue B   Storm Gert G   van der Hulst René R W J RRWJ   Heger Michal M  

PloS one 20200702 7


<h4>Background</h4>Valid and reliable outcome measures are needed to determine and compare treatment results of port wine stain (PWS) studies. Besides, uniformity in outcome measures is crucial to enable inter-study comparisons and meta-analyses. This study aimed to assess the heterogeneity in reported PWS outcome measures by mapping the (clinical) outcome measures currently used in prospective PWS studies.<h4>Methods</h4>OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for prospective PWS s  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7660535 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4508108 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9603382 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8117375 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9892359 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4143189 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4975081 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3749068 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7940906 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9348515 | biostudies-literature