Dataset Information

Methodology for characterizing emissions from small (0.5-2 MTD) batch-fed gasification systems using multiple waste compositions.

ABSTRACT: A compact, containerized gasification system was characterized for air emissions while burning four waste types. A methodology is presented for developing a standardized test waste composition and demonstrated using three military and one civilian waste types. Batch charges of waste were processed through a gasification chamber, afterburner, and wet scrubber. The 0.5-2 metric ton per day (MTD) system was designed for mobile deployment by the military in forward operations but would be applicable to small scale civilian applications. Emissions data from these types of small capacity, cyclically operated systems are lacking, limiting efforts to compare technologies and their environmental performance. Eight tests were conducted in a 7-day period at the Kilauea Military Camp (KMC) in Hawaii. The pollutants characterized were chosen based on their regulatory and health relevance: particulate matter (PM), mercury (Hg), elemental composition, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs). Averaged data from 4-hour runs, including startups and shutdowns, indicated that five of the nine EPA-regulated compounds (lead, cadmium, Hg, sulfur dioxide, and hydrogen chloride) were under the emission limits set for Other Solid Waste Incineration Units (OSWI) while four, PCDD/PCDF, PM, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide, were higher. The procedures through which waste compositions were created and emissions were characterized provide a methodology by which differing waste to energy technologies can be compared on an equivalent basis. This system's emissions compare favorably with alternative disposal methods. PM and PCDD/PCDF emission factors were, respectively, over 39 and 9 times lower from this unit than from published data on burning simulated military waste in an air curtain incinerator and in open burn piles ("burn pits").

SUBMITTER: Aurell J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7357792 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Methodology for characterizing emissions from small (0.5-2 MTD) batch-fed gasification systems using multiple waste compositions.

Aurell J J Barnes M M Gullett B K BK Holder A A Eninger R R

Waste management (New York, N.Y.) 20190218

A compact, containerized gasification system was characterized for air emissions while burning four waste types. A methodology is presented for developing a standardized test waste composition and demonstrated using three military and one civilian waste types. Batch charges of waste were processed through a gasification chamber, afterburner, and wet scrubber. The 0.5-2 metric ton per day (MTD) system was designed for mobile deployment by the military in forward operations but would be applicable ...[more]

PMID: 31109540

Similar Datasets

Project description:Among the different thermo-chemical recycling routes for plastic waste valorization, gasification is one of the most promising, converting plastic waste into syngas (H2+CO) and energy in the presence of an oxygen-rich gas. Plastic waste gasification is associated with many different complexities due to the multi-scale nature of the process, the feedstock complexity (mixed polyolefins with different contaminations), intricate reaction mechanisms, plastic properties (melting behavior and molecular weight distribution), and complex transport phenomena in a multi-phase flow system. Hence, creating a reliable model calls for an extensive understanding of the phenomena at all scales, and more advanced modeling approaches than those applied today are required. Indeed, modeling of plastic waste gasification (PWG) is still in its infancy today. Our review paper shows that the thermophysical properties are rarely properly defined. Challenges in this regard together with possible methodologies to decently define these properties have been elaborated. The complexities regarding the kinetic modeling of gasification are numerous, compared to, e.g., plastic waste pyrolysis, or coal and biomass gasification, which are elaborated in this work along with the possible solutions to overcome them. Moreover, transport limitations and phase transformations, which affect the apparent kinetics of the process, are not usually considered, while it is demonstrated in this review that they are crucial in the robust prediction of the outcome. Hence, possible approaches in implementing available models to consider these limitations are suggested. Finally, the reactor-scale phenomena of PWG, which are more intricate than the similar processes-due to the presence of molten plastic-are usually simplified to the gas-solid systems, which can result in unreliable modeling frameworks. In this regard, an opportunity lies in the increased computational power that helps improve the model's precision and allows us to include those complexities within the multi-scale PWG modeling. Using the more accurate modeling methodologies in combination with multi-scale modeling approaches will, in a decade, allow us to perform a rigorous optimization of the PWG process, improve existing and develop new gasifiers, and avoid fouling issues caused by tar.

Dataset Information

Methodology for characterizing emissions from small (0.5-2 MTD) batch-fed gasification systems using multiple waste compositions.

Publications

Methodology for characterizing emissions from small (0.5-2 MTD) batch-fed gasification systems using multiple waste compositions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets