Dataset Information

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Prestroke Disability.

ABSTRACT: Background and Purpose- We aimed to compare functional and procedural outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke with none-to-minimal (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score, 0-1) and moderate (mRS score, 2-3) prestroke disability treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Methods- Consecutive adult patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for an anterior circulation stroke were prospectively identified at 2 comprehensive stroke centers from 2012 to 2018. Procedural and 90-day functional outcomes were compared among patients with prestroke mRS scores 0 to 1 and 2 to 3 using χ², logistic, and linear regression tests. Primary outcome and significant differences in secondary outcomes were adjusted for prespecified covariates. Results- Of 919 patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, 761 were included and 259 (34%) patients had moderate prestroke disability. Ninety-day mRS score 0 to 1 or no worsening of prestroke mRS was observed in 36.7% and 26.7% of patients with no-to-minimal and moderate prestroke disability, respectively (odds ratio, 0.63 [0.45-0.88], P=0.008; adjusted odds ratio, 0.90 [0.60-1.35], P=0.6). No increase in the disability at 90 days was observed in 22.4% and 26.7%, respectively. Rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (7.3% versus 6.2%, P=0.65), successful recanalization (86.7% versus 83.8%, P=0.33), and median length of hospital stay (5 versus 5 days, P=0.06) were not significantly different. Death by 90 days was higher in patients with moderate prestroke disability (14.3% versus 40.3%; odds ratio, 4.06 [2.82-5.86], P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 2.83 [1.84, 4.37], P<0.001). Conclusions- One-third of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy had a moderate prestroke disability. There was insufficient evidence that functional and procedural outcomes were different between patients with no-to-minimal and moderate prestroke disability. Patients with prestroke disability were more likely to die by 90 days.

SUBMITTER: Salwi S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7367056 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe beneficial effects of endovascular treatment with new-generation mechanical thrombectomy devices compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone to treat acute large-artery ischemic stroke have been shown in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study aimed to estimate the cost utility of mechanical thrombectomy compared with the established standard of care.MethodsWe developed a Markov decision process analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment with mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis versus treatment with intravenous thrombolysis alone from the public payer perspective in Canada. We conducted comprehensive literature searches to populate model inputs. We estimated the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis from a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs, and we used data from the Oxford Vascular Study to model long-term clinical outcomes. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) using a 5-year time horizon.ResultsThe base case analysis showed the cost and effectiveness of treatment with mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis to be $126?939 and 1.484 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), respectively, and the cost and effectiveness of treatment with intravenous thrombolysis alone to be $124?419 and 1.273 QALYs, respectively. The mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis strategy was associated with an ICER of $11?990 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of treatment with mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous thrombolysis being cost-effective was 57.5%, 89.7% and 99.6% at thresholds of $20?000, $50?000 and $100?000 per QALY gained, respectively. The main factors influencing the ICER were time horizon, extra cost of mechanical thrombectomy treatment and age of the patient.InterpretationMechanical thrombectomy as an adjunct therapy to intravenous thrombolysis is cost-effective compared with treatment with intravenous thrombolysis alone for patients with acute large-artery ischemic stroke.

Project description:ImportanceIt is uncertain whether thrombectomy is associated with benefits in patients with prestroke disability.ObjectiveTo evaluate the use of thrombectomy for patients with large vessel occlusion and prestroke disability.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study included patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and prestroke disability (modified Rankin Scale score, 3 or 4) admitted to a single tertiary care center between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2019 (controls: 2006-2015; thrombectomy: 2015-2019). Follow-up was conducted at 90 days. Data analysis was performed from November 1 to December 31, 2021.ExposuresUse of thrombectomy vs no thrombectomy.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was functional recovery at 90 days defined as clinical recovery to the functional status before stroke onset. Secondary outcomes included functional dependency, mortality, early neurologic improvement, and recanalization.ResultsAmong 205 patients (149 women [72.7%]; median age, 82 years [IQR, 75-87 years]), 102 individuals (49.8%) received thrombectomy and 103 (50.2%) were controls. Thrombectomy was significantly associated with functional recovery (thrombectomy, 20 [19.6%]; controls, 8 [7.8%]; adjusted difference, 9.4%; 95% CI, 2.2% to 16.7%; P = .005). Secondary outcomes showed differences in mortality, early neurologic improvement, and recanalization in favor of thrombectomy treatment. The rate of functional dependency did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (adjusted difference, 8.9%; 95% CI, -2.5% to 20.2%; P = .13). The rate of functional recovery after thrombectomy was 44.0% for patients with early neurologic improvement, 29.4% for patients with small infarct volume (<50 mL), and 7.0% for patients with neither of these parameters.Conclusions and relevanceFindings of this study suggest that selected patients with prestroke disability may benefit from thrombectomy. However, the thrombectomy-associated increase in functional recovery was small. Therefore, routine use of thrombectomy may not be beneficial among patients with a large ischemic core and infarct volumes less than 50 mL may be necessary to obtain functional recovery. Patients with higher chances of functional recovery are also at an increased risk of survival with substantial disability, indicating potential harms from the intervention; further studies are needed.

Project description:Background and Purpose- If anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with ASPECTS 0-5 (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) should be treated with mechanical thrombectomy remains unclear. Purpose of this study was to report on the outcome of patients with ASPECTS 0-5 treated with mechanical thrombectomy and to provide data regarding the effect of successful reperfusion on clinical outcomes and safety measures in these patients. Methods- Multicenter, pooled analysis of 7 institutional prospective registries: Bernese-European Registry for Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated Outside Current Guidelines With Neurothrombectomy Devices Using the SOLITAIRE FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy (Clinical Trial Registration-URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03496064). Primary outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-3 at day 90 (favorable outcome). Secondary outcomes included rates of day 90 modified Rankin Scale 0-2 (functional independence), day 90 mortality and occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of successful reperfusion with clinical outcomes. Outputs are displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) and 95% CI. Results- Two hundred thirty-seven of 2046 patients included in this registry presented with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and ASPECTS 0-5. In this subgroup, the overall rates of favorable outcome and mortality at day 90 were 40.1% and 40.9%. Achieving successful reperfusion was independently associated with favorable outcome (aOR, 5.534; 95% CI, 2.363-12.961), functional independence (aOR, 5.583; 95% CI, 1.964-15.873), reduced mortality (aOR, 0.180; 95% CI, 0.083-0.390), and lower rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR, 0.235; 95% CI, 0.062-0.887). The mortality-reducing effect remained in patients with ASPECTS 0-4 (aOR, 0.167; 95% CI, 0.056-0.499). Sensitivity analyses did not change the primary results. Conclusions- In patients presenting with ASPECTS 0-5, who were treated with mechanical thrombectomy, successful reperfusion was beneficial without increasing the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Although the results do not allow for general treatment recommendations, formal testing of mechanical thrombectomy versus best medical treatment in these patients in a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Dataset Information

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Prestroke Disability.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets