Dataset Information

Association of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement With Rates of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Cancer and Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Venous thromboembolism is the second overall leading cause of death for patients with cancer, and there is an approximately 2-fold increase in fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with cancer. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are designed to prevent PE, but defining the appropriate use of IVC filters in patients with cancer remains a substantial unmet clinical need.

Objective

To evaluate the association of IVC filters with the development of PE in patients with cancer and deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Design, setting, and participants

A population-based cohort study was conducted using administrative data on 88 585 patients from the state inpatient databases for California (2005-2011) and Florida (2005-2014). Based on diagnostic and procedure codes, patients with cancer and acute lower extremity DVT were identified. All subsequent hospital visits for these patients were evaluated for the placement of an IVC filter, the development of new PE, the development of new DVT, and in-hospital mortality. Data analysis was performed from September 1 to December 1, 2019.

Exposures

Placement of an IVC filter.

Main outcomes and measures

The association of IVC filter placement with rates of new PE and DVT was estimated using a propensity score matching algorithm and competing risk analysis.

Results

The study cohort comprised 88 585 patients (45 074 male; median age, 71.0 years [range, 1.0-104.0 years]) with malignant neoplasms who presented to a health care institution with a diagnosis of acute lower extremity DVT. Of these patients, 33 740 (38.1%) underwent IVC filter placement; patients with risk factors such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.29-1.37), intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.19-1.24), and coagulopathy (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.10) were more likely to receive an IVC filter. A total of 4492 patients (5.1%) developed a new PE after their initial DVT diagnosis. There was a significant improvement in PE-free survival for these patients compared with those who did not receive IVC filters across the full, unbalanced study cohort as well as after propensity score matching and competing risk analysis (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.75; P < .001). Furthermore, IVC filter placement reduced the development of PE in patients with very high-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, pancreaticobiliary cancer), high-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, lung cancer), and low-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, prostate cancer). After accounting for anticoagulation use and imbalanced risk factors, IVC filter placement did not increase the risk of new DVT development.

Conclusions and relevance

This study suggests that, for patients with cancer and DVT and bleeding risk factors, IVC filter placement is associated with an increased rate of PE-free survival.

SUBMITTER: Balabhadra S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7378756 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Previous observational studies suggest that inferior vena cava filter placement in pulmonary embolism patients complicated with congestive heart failure, mechanical ventilation, and shock may have a mortality benefit. We sought to analyze the survival benefits of inferior vena cava filter in pulmonary embolism patients complicated with acute myocardial infarction, acute respiratory failure, shock, or requiring treatment with thrombolytics. Methods: This retrospective observational study used hospital discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample Data (NIS). ICD-9-CM coding was used to identify complicated pulmonary embolism patients (N = 254,465) in NIS from 2002 to 2014, including the subgroups of acute myocardial infarction, acute respiratory failure, shock, and thrombolytics. Inferior vena cava filter recipients were 1:1 propensity score-matched on age, sex, race, deep vein thrombosis, Elixhauser comorbidities, and other pulmonary embolism comorbidities (45 covariates) to non-inferior vena cava filter recipients in complicated pulmonary embolism patients and separately in each subgroup. Clinical outcomes were compared between the inferior vena cava filter group and the non-inferior vena cava filter group. Results: Mortality rate in complicated pulmonary embolism patients with inferior vena cava filter placement was lower (20.9% vs. 33%; NNT = 8.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.91-8.69, E-value = 2.53) and in the subgroups; acute myocardial infarction (17.9% vs. 30.1%; NNT = 8.19, 95% CI 7.52-8.92, E-value = 2.76), acute respiratory failure (19.5% vs. 29.7%; NNT = 9.76, 95% CI 8.67-11.16, E-value = 2.38), shock (30.7% vs. 47.1%; NNT = 6.08, 95% CI 5.73-6.47, E-value = 2.43), and with the use of thrombolytics (7% vs. 12.9 %; NNT 17.1, 95% CI 14.88-20.12, E-value = 3.01) (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusion: Inferior vena cava filter placement in pulmonary embolism complicated with acute myocardial infarction, acute respiratory failure, shock, or requiring thrombolytic therapy was associated with reduced mortality.

Project description:BackgroundInferior vena cava filter (IVCF) thrombosis is an uncommon complication of IVCF utilization. The aims of this study were to investigate inferior vena cava (IVC) venography before filter retrieval to determine the incidence relative to filter dwell time and risk factors of IVCF thrombosis based on the clinical data and imaging findings in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT).MethodsThe clinical data from a multicenter randomized trial conducted between October 2017 and March 2019 were reviewed to determine the incidence of IVCF thrombosis in preretrieval venography and the associated risk factors. The correlation between filter dwell times (within 90 days) and incidence was assessed. Baseline demographics, LEDVT presentation, laboratory examination, thrombus characteristics, concurrent pulmonary embolism (PE), comorbidities and risk factors for LEDVT, and IVCF-relevant information were analyzed using the independent samples t-test, chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and regression analysis to determine the univariable and multivariable associations in assessing the risk factors of IVCF thrombosis.ResultsA total of 178 eligible patients were included, of whom 58 were in the IVCF thrombosis group and 120 were in the IVCF nonthrombosis group, and the mean filter dwell time was 22.07±27.91 days (range, 4-190 days). The overall incidence of IVCF thrombosis in patients with LEDVT who received IVCFs was 32.58% (58/178). The incidence of IVCF thrombosis was 35.25% (49/139) in the first 30 days after the IVCF placement and decreased to 22.73% (5/22) between 30 to 60 days of dwell time and to 18.18% (2/11) between 60 and 90 days of dwell time, indicating a decreasing trend within the first 90 days. The risk factors for the occurrence of IVCF thrombosis were concurrent PE [odds ratio (OR) =2.59; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-5.28; P=0.01], rheumatic diseases of the immune system (OR =14.42; 95% CI: 1.52-136.41; P=0.02), IVC:filter radial ratio >0.587 (OR =0.25; 95% CI: 0.10-0.65; P<0.01), and percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) (OR =2.50; 95% CI: 1.09-5.70; P=0.03).ConclusionsThe incidence of IVCF thrombosis at the time of filter retrieval appears to decrease with dwell time within 90 days. Concurrent PE, rheumatic diseases of the immune system, and PTA were taken into account as risk factors. An IVC:filter radial ratio of 0.587 was a protective factor against developing IVCF thrombosis. These findings require further validation in a well-designed study since the present study lacked a close follow-up.

Project description:The Sentry inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is designed to provide temporary protection against pulmonary embolism (PE) during transient high-risk periods and then to bioconvert after 60 days after implantation. At the time of bioconversion, the device's nitinol arms retract from the filtering position into the caval wall. Subsequently, the stable stent-like nitinol frame is endothelialized. The Sentry bioconvertible IVC filter has been evaluated in a multicenter investigational-device-exemption pivotal trial (NCT01975090) of 129 patients with documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE, or at temporary risk of developing DVT or PE, and with contraindications to anticoagulation. Successful filter conversion was observed in 95.7% of patients at 6 months (110/115) and 96.4% at 12 months (106/110). Through 12 months, there were no cases of symptomatic PE. The rationale for development of the Sentry bioconvertible device includes the following considerations: (1) the period of highest risk of PE for the vast majority of patients occurs within the first 60 days after an index event, with most of the PEs occurring in the first 30 days; (2) the design of retrievable IVC filters to support their removal after a transitory high-PE-risk period has, in practice, been associated with insecure filter dynamics and time-dependent complications including tilting, fracture, embolization, migration, and IVC perforation; (3) most retrievable IVC filters are placed for temporary protection, but for a variety of reasons they are not removed in any more than half of implanted patients, and when removal is attempted, the procedure is not always successful even with advanced techniques; and (4) analysis of Medicare hospital data suggests that payment for the retrieval procedure does not routinely compensate for expense. The Sentry device is not intended for removal after bioconversion. In initial clinical use, complications have been limited. Long-term results for the Sentry bioconvertible IVC filter are anticipated soon.