Dataset Information

Best practice in reporting corona studies: Minimum information about Nanomaterial Biocorona Experiments (MINBE).

ABSTRACT: Characterisation of the adsorption of biomolecules, or a biocorona, on nanomaterials has proliferated in the past 10 years, as protein corona studies provide molecular level insight into mechanisms of cellular recognition, uptake, and toxicity of nanomaterials. At the crossroads of two rapidly evolving orthogonal fields, nanoscience and proteomics, the interdisciplinarity of protein corona studies creates challenges for experimental design and reporting. Here we propose a flexible checklist for experimental design and reporting guidelines to outline Minimum Information about Nanomaterial Biocorona Experiments (MINBE). The checklist for experimental design, compiled after review of reporting within the protein corona literature, provides researchers with prompts to ensure best practice experimental approaches for each stage of the workflow, collated from the nanoscience, proteomics, and bioinformatics fields. Reporting guidelines are also assembled from established sources, integrated to span the entire workflow and extended and modified to aid interdisciplinary researchers in the most challenging stages of the workflow. Where appropriate, de novo guidelines to address areas specific to protein corona studies, including exposure conditions and isolation of adsorbed proteins, were written. The MINBE guidelines provide protein corona researchers with a conduit between materials science techniques and proteomics. Implementation of these guidelines is anticipated to catalyse enhanced quality, impact, and extent of data mining and computational modelling of protein corona composition and its role in nanosafety and nanomedicine. Furthermore, high quality experimental design and reporting in the bio-nanosciences will enhance the next phase of targeted nanomedicines and sustainable nanotechnologies.

SUBMITTER: Chetwynd AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7405976 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Best practice in reporting corona studies: Minimum information about Nanomaterial Biocorona Experiments (MINBE).

Chetwynd Andrew J AJ Wheeler Korin E KE Lynch Iseult I

Nano today 20190817

Characterisation of the adsorption of biomolecules, or a biocorona, on nanomaterials has proliferated in the past 10 years, as protein corona studies provide molecular level insight into mechanisms of cellular recognition, uptake, and toxicity of nanomaterials. At the crossroads of two rapidly evolving orthogonal fields, nanoscience and proteomics, the interdisciplinarity of protein corona studies creates challenges for experimental design and reporting. Here we propose a flexible checklist for ...[more]

PMID: 32774443

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Biology, biomedicine and healthcare have become data-driven enterprises, where scientists and clinicians need to generate, access, validate, interpret and integrate different kinds of experimental and patient-related data. Thus, recording and reporting of data in a systematic and unambiguous fashion is crucial to allow aggregation and re-use of data. This paper reviews the benefits of existing biomedical data standards and focuses on key elements to record experiments for therapy development. Specifically, we describe the experiments performed in molecular, cellular, animal and clinical models. We also provide an example set of elements for a therapy tested in a phase I clinical trial. FINDINGS: We introduce the Guidelines for Information About Therapy Experiments (GIATE), a minimum information checklist creating a consistent framework to transparently report the purpose, methods and results of the therapeutic experiments. A discussion on the scope, design and structure of the guidelines is presented, together with a description of the intended audience. We also present complementary resources such as a classification scheme, and two alternative ways of creating GIATE information: an electronic lab notebook and a simple spreadsheet-based format. Finally, we use GIATE to record the details of the phase I clinical trial of CHT-25 for patients with refractory lymphomas. The benefits of using GIATE for this experiment are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: While data standards are being developed to facilitate data sharing and integration in various aspects of experimental medicine, such as genomics and clinical data, no previous work focused on therapy development. We propose a checklist for therapy experiments and demonstrate its use in the 131Iodine labeled CHT-25 chimeric antibody cancer therapy. As future work, we will expand the set of GIATE tools to continue to encourage its use by cancer researchers, and we will engineer an ontology to annotate GIATE elements and facilitate unambiguous interpretation and data integration.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Creation and use of ontologies has become a mainstream activity in many disciplines, in particular, the biomedical domain. Ontology developers often disseminate information about these ontologies in peer-reviewed ontology description reports. There appears to be, however, a high degree of variability in the content of these reports. Often, important details are omitted such that it is difficult to gain a sufficient understanding of the ontology, its content and method of creation. RESULTS:We propose the Minimum Information for Reporting an Ontology (MIRO) guidelines as a means to facilitate a higher degree of completeness and consistency between ontology documentation, including published papers, and ultimately a higher standard of report quality. A draft of the MIRO guidelines was circulated for public comment in the form of a questionnaire, and we subsequently collected 110 responses from ontology authors, developers, users and reviewers. We report on the feedback of this consultation, including comments on each guideline, and present our analysis on the relative importance of each MIRO information item. These results were used to update the MIRO guidelines, mainly by providing more detailed operational definitions of the individual items and assigning degrees of importance. Based on our revised version of MIRO, we conducted a review of 15 recently published ontology description reports from three important journals in the Semantic Web and Biomedical domain and analysed them for compliance with the MIRO guidelines. We found that only 41.38% of the information items were covered by the majority of the papers (and deemed important by the survey respondents) and a large number of important items are not covered at all, like those related to testing and versioning policies. CONCLUSIONS:We believe that the community-reviewed MIRO guidelines can contribute to improving significantly the quality of ontology description reports and other documentation, in particular by increasing consistent reporting of important ontology features that are otherwise often neglected.

Dataset Information

Best practice in reporting corona studies: Minimum information about Nanomaterial Biocorona Experiments (MINBE).

Publications

Best practice in reporting corona studies: Minimum information about Nanomaterial Biocorona Experiments (MINBE).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets