Dataset Information

A novel calibration framework for survival analysis when a binary covariate is measured at sparse time points.

ABSTRACT: The goals in clinical and cohort studies often include evaluation of the association of a time-dependent binary treatment or exposure with a survival outcome. Recently, several impactful studies targeted the association between initiation of aspirin and survival following colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. The value of this exposure is zero at baseline and may change its value to one at some time point. Estimating this association is complicated by having only intermittent measurements on aspirin-taking. Commonly used methods can lead to substantial bias. We present a class of calibration models for the distribution of the time of status change of the binary covariate. Estimates obtained from these models are then incorporated into the proportional hazard partial likelihood in a natural way. We develop non-parametric, semiparametric, and parametric calibration models, and derive asymptotic theory for the methods that we implement in the aspirin and CRC study. We further develop a risk-set calibration approach that is more useful in settings in which the association between the binary covariate and survival is strong.

SUBMITTER: Nevo D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7406130 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A novel calibration framework for survival analysis when a binary covariate is measured at sparse time points.

Nevo Daniel D Hamada Tsuyoshi T Ogino Shuji S Wang Molin M

Biostatistics (Oxford, England) 20200401 2

The goals in clinical and cohort studies often include evaluation of the association of a time-dependent binary treatment or exposure with a survival outcome. Recently, several impactful studies targeted the association between initiation of aspirin and survival following colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. The value of this exposure is zero at baseline and may change its value to one at some time point. Estimating this association is complicated by having only intermittent measurements on aspiri ...[more]

PMID: 30380012

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRestricted mean survival time is a measure of average survival time up to a specified time point. There has been an increased interest in using restricted mean survival time to compare treatment arms in randomized clinical trials because such comparisons do not rely on proportional hazards or other assumptions about the nature of the relationship between survival curves.MethodsThis article addresses the question of whether covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials that compare restricted mean survival times improves precision of the estimated treatment effect (difference in restricted mean survival times between treatment arms). Although precision generally increases in linear models when prognostic covariates are added, this is not necessarily the case in non-linear models. For example, in logistic and Cox regression, the standard error of the estimated treatment effect does not decrease when prognostic covariates are added, although the situation is complicated in those settings because the estimand changes as well. Because estimation of restricted mean survival time in the manner described in this article is also based on a model that is non-linear in the covariates, we investigate whether the comparison of restricted mean survival times with adjustment for covariates leads to a reduction in the standard error of the estimated treatment effect relative to the unadjusted estimator or whether covariate adjustment provides no improvement in precision. Chen and Tsiatis suggest that precision will increase if covariates are chosen judiciously. We present results of simulation studies that compare unadjusted versus adjusted comparisons of restricted mean survival time between treatment arms in randomized clinical trials.ResultsWe find that for comparison of restricted means in a randomized clinical trial, adjusting for covariates that are associated with survival increases precision and therefore statistical power, relative to the unadjusted estimator. Omitting important covariates results in less precision but estimates remain unbiased.ConclusionWhen comparing restricted means in a randomized clinical trial, adjusting for prognostic covariates can improve precision and increase power.

Dataset Information

A novel calibration framework for survival analysis when a binary covariate is measured at sparse time points.

Publications

A novel calibration framework for survival analysis when a binary covariate is measured at sparse time points.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets