Dataset Information

Are heart rate methods based on ergometer cycling and level treadmill walking interchangeable?

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:The heart rate (HR) method is a promising approach for evaluating oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), energy demands and exercise intensities in different forms of physical activities. It would be valuable if the HR method, established on ergometer cycling, is interchangeable with other regular activities, such as level walking. This study therefore aimed to examine the interchangeability of the HR method when estimating [Formula: see text] for ergometer cycling and level treadmill walking in submaximal conditions. METHODS:Two models of [Formula: see text] regression equations for cycle ergometer exercise (CEE) and treadmill exercise (TE) were established with 34 active commuters. Model 1 consisted of three submaximal intensities of ergometer cycling or level walking, model 2 included also one additional workload of maximal ergometer cycling or running. The regression equations were used for estimating [Formula: see text] with seven individual HR values based on 25-85% of HR reserve (HRR). The [Formula: see text] estimations were compared between CEE and TE, within and between each model. RESULTS:Only minor, and in most cases non-significant, average differences were observed when comparing the estimated [Formula: see text] levels between CEE and TE. Model 1 ranged from -0.4 to 4.8% (n.s.) between 25-85%HRR. In model 2, the differences between 25-65%HRR ranged from 1.3 to -2.7% (n.s.). At the two highest intensities, 75 and 85%HRR, [Formula: see text] was slightly lower (3.7%, 4.4%; P < 0.05), for CEE than TE. The inclusion of maximal exercise in the [Formula: see text] relationships reduced the individual [Formula: see text] variations between the two exercise modalities. CONCLUSION:The HR methods, based on submaximal ergometer cycling and level walking, are interchangeable for estimating mean [Formula: see text] levels between 25-85% of HRR. Essentially, the same applies when adding maximal exercise in the [Formula: see text] relationships. The inter-individual [Formula: see text] variation between ergometer cycling and treadmill exercise is reduced when using the HR method based on both submaximal and maximal workloads.

SUBMITTER: Olsson K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7410327 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Are heart rate methods based on ergometer cycling and level treadmill walking interchangeable?

Olsson Karin K Salier Eriksson Jane J Rosdahl Hans H Schantz Peter P

PloS one 20200806 8

<h4>Introduction</h4>The heart rate (HR) method is a promising approach for evaluating oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), energy demands and exercise intensities in different forms of physical activities. It would be valuable if the HR method, established on ergometer cycling, is interchangeable with other regular activities, such as level walking. This study therefore aimed to examine the interchangeability of the HR method when estimating [Formula: see text] for ergometer cycling and level t ...[more]

PMID: 32760167

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used widely in the diagnosis, exercise therapy, and prognosis evaluation of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The current guideline for CPET does not provide any specific recommendations for cardiovascular (CV) safety on exercise stimulation mode, including bicycle ergometer, treadmill, and total body workout equipment.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the effects of different exercise stimulation modes on the occurrence of safety events during CPET in patients with CHD.MethodsA total of 10,538 CPETs, including 5,674 performed using treadmill exercise and 4,864 performed using bicycle ergometer exercise at Peking University Third Hospital, were analyzed retrospectively. The incidences of CV events and serious adverse events during CPET were compared between the two exercise groups.ResultsCardiovascular events in enrolled patients occurred during 355 CPETs (3.4%), including 2 cases of adverse events (0.019%), both in the treadmill group. The incidences of overall events [235 (4.1%) vs. 120 (2.5%), P < 0.001], premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) [121 (2.1%) vs. 63 (1.3%), P = 0.001], angina pectoris [45 (0.8%) vs. 5 (0.1%), P < 0.001], and ventricular tachycardia (VT) [32 (0.6%) vs. 14 (0.3%), P = 0.032] were significantly higher in the treadmill group compared with the bicycle ergometer group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of bradyarrhythmia and atrial arrhythmia between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that the occurrence of overall CV events (P < 0.001), PVCs (P = 0.007), angina pectoris (P < 0.001), and VT (P = 0.008) was independently associated with the stimulation method of treadmill exercise. In male subjects, the occurrence of overall CV events, PVCs, angina pectoris, and VT were independently associated with treadmill exercise, while only the overall CV events and angina pectoris were independently associated with treadmill exercise in female subjects.ConclusionIn comparison with treadmill exercise, bicycle ergometer exercise appears to be a safer exercise stimulation mode for CPET in patients with CHD.

Dataset Information

Are heart rate methods based on ergometer cycling and level treadmill walking interchangeable?

Publications

Are heart rate methods based on ergometer cycling and level treadmill walking interchangeable?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets