Dataset Information

The combination of symphysis-fundal height and abdominal circumference as a novel predictor of macrosomia in GDM and normal pregnancy.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Macrosomia is a major adverse pregnancy outcome of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Although BMI, symphysis-fundal height (SFH) and abdominal circumference (AC) are associated with foetal weight, there are some limitations to their use, especially for the prediction of macrosomia. This study aimed to identify a novel predictive methodology to improve the prediction of high-risk macrosomia. METHODS:Clinical information was collected from 3730 patients. The association between the ISFHAC (index of the SFH algorithm multiplied by the square of AC) and foetal weight was determined and validated. A new index, the ISFHAC, was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS:A total of 1087 GDM and 657 normal singleton pregnancies were analysed. The ISFHAC was positively correlated with foetal weight in GDM pregnancies and normal pregnancies (NPs). The AUCs of the ISFHAC were 0.815 in the GDM group and 0.804 in the NP group, which were higher than those of BMI, SFH, AC and GA. The ISFHAC cut-off points were 41.7 and 37 in the GDM and NP groups, respectively. The sensitivity values for the prediction of macrosomia with high ISFHAC values were 75.9 and 81.3% in the GDM and NP groups, respectively, which were higher than those with BMI. Regarding the validation data, the sensitivity values for prediction with high ISFHAC values were 78.9% (559 GDM pregnancies) and 78.3% (1427 NPs). CONCLUSIONS:The ISFHAC can be regarded as a new predictor of and risk factor for macrosomia in GDM pregnancy and NP.

SUBMITTER: Chen ZG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7425134 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The combination of symphysis-fundal height and abdominal circumference as a novel predictor of macrosomia in GDM and normal pregnancy.

Chen Zhi Guo ZG Xu Ya Ting YT Ji Lu Lu LL Zhang Xiao Li XL Chen Xiao Xing XX Liu Rui R Wu Chao C Wang Yan Ling YL Hu Han Yang HY Wang Lin L

BMC pregnancy and childbirth 20200812 1

<h4>Background</h4>Macrosomia is a major adverse pregnancy outcome of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Although BMI, symphysis-fundal height (SFH) and abdominal circumference (AC) are associated with foetal weight, there are some limitations to their use, especially for the prediction of macrosomia. This study aimed to identify a novel predictive methodology to improve the prediction of high-risk macrosomia.<h4>Methods</h4>Clinical information was collected from 3730 patients. The associatio ...[more]

PMID: 32787792

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo improve the accuracy of the prediction of gestational age (GA) before birth with the standardised measurement of symphysis-fundal height (SFH), estimation of uterine volume, and statistical modelling including maternal anthropometrics and other factors.DesignProspective pregnancy cohort study.SettingRural communities in Sylhet, Bangladesh.Participants1516 women with singleton pregnancies with early pregnancy ultrasound dating (<20 weeks); 1486 completed follow-up.MethodsSFH and abdominal girth were measured at subsequent antenatal care (ANC) visits by community health workers at 24 to 28, 32 to 36, and/or >37 weeks gestation. An estimated uterine volume (EUV) was calculated from these measures. Data on pregnancy characteristics and other maternal anthropometrics were also collected.Primary outcome measureGA at subsequent ANC visits, as defined by early ultrasound dating.Results1486 (98%) women had at least one subsequent ANC visit, 1102 (74%) women had two subsequent ANC visits, and 748 (50%) had three visits. Using the common clinical practice of approximating the GA (in weeks) with the SFH measurement (cm), SFH systematically underestimated GA in late pregnancy (mean difference -4.4 weeks, 95% limits of agreement -12.5 to 3.7). For the classification of GA <28 weeks, SFH <26 cm had 85% sensitivity and 81% specificity; and for GA <34 weeks, SFH <29 cm had 83% sensitivity and 71% specificity. EUV had similar diagnostic accuracy. Despite rigorous statistical modelling of SFH, accounting for repeated longitudinal measurements and additional predictors, the best model without including a known last menstrual period predicted 95% of pregnancy dates within ±7.4 weeks of early ultrasound dating.ConclusionsWe were unable to predict GA with a high degree of accuracy before birth using maternal anthropometric measures and other available maternal characteristics. Efforts to improve GA dating in low- and middle-income countries before birth should focus on increasing coverage and training of ultrasonography.Trial registration numberNCT01572532.

Project description:BackgroundIn the absence of ultrasound, symphysis-fundal height (SFH) can assess maternal-fetal well-being as it is associated with gestational age, fetal weight, and amniotic fluid volume. However, other modifiers of SFH, including maternal infections, nutrient deficiencies, and inflammation (MINDI), have not been widely explored.ObjectivesOur objectives were 2-fold: 1) to assess prevalence of low SFH in indigenous Panamanian women using both Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) and INTERGROWTH-21 standards and 2) to explore associations of SFH with maternal health indicators: infections (oral, skin, urogenital, nematode infections), nutrient deficiencies [protein and iron indicators (ferritin, serum iron, serum transferrin receptor, hepcidin), folate, and vitamins A, D, and B-12], and inflammation [leukocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP), cytokines].MethodsFor this cross-sectional study, low-SFH-for-gestational-age was assessed using PAHO and INTERGROWTH <10th centile in 174 women at ≥16 weeks of gestation. Bootstrapping selected MINDI variables for inclusion in multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) logistic regressions for low SFH. Associations of MINDI variables with hepcidin were also investigated.ResultsPrevalence of low SFH was 8% using PAHO, but using INTERGROWTH, 50.6% had SFH <10th centile, including 37.9% <3rd centile. Both PAHO-SFH <10th centile and INTERGROWTH-SFH <3rd centile were associated with higher hepcidin (OR = 1.12, P = 0.008, and OR = 3.04, P = 0.001, respectively) and with lower TNF-α (OR = 0.73, P = 0.012, and OR = 0.93, P = 0.015, respectively). Wood-smoke exposure increased the odds of PAHO-SFH <10th centile (OR = 1.19, P = 0.009), whereas higher BMI decreased the odds of INTERGROWTH-SFH <3rd centile (OR = 0.87, P = 0.012). Lower pulse pressure (OR = 0.90, P = 0.009) and lower inflammatory responses [lower lymphocytes (OR = 0.21, P = 0.026), IL-17 (OR = 0.89, P = 0.011)] distinguished SFH <3rd centile from SFH ≥3rd to <10th centiles using INTERGROWTH-21 standards. The MFP regression for hepcidin controlling for SFH (adjusted R 2 = 0.40, P = 0.001) revealed associations with indicators of inflammation (CRP, P < 0.0001; IL-17, P = 0.012), acidic urinary pH (P = 0.008), and higher intake of supplements (P = 0.035).ConclusionsAssociations of low SFH with MINDI variables, including hepcidin, highlight its potential for early detection of multicausal in utero growth faltering.

Project description:Objective The objective of the study was to determine whether adding longitudinal measures of fundal height (FH) to the standard cross-sectional FH to trigger third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight (EFW) would improve small for gestational age (SGA) prediction.Study design We developed a longitudinal FH calculator in a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of 1,939 nonobese pregnant women who underwent serial FH evaluations at 12 U.S. clinical sites. We evaluated cross-sectional FH measurement ≤ -3 cm at visit 3 (mean: 32.0 ± 1.6 weeks) versus the addition of longitudinal FH up to and including visit 3 to trigger an ultrasound to diagnose SGA defined as birthweight <10th percentile. If the FH cut points were not met, the SGA screen was classified as negative. If FH cut points were met and EFW was <10th percentile, the SGA screen was considered positive. If EFW was ≥10th percentile, the SGA screen was also considered negative. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were computed.Results In a comparison of methods, 5.8% of women were classified as at risk of SGA by both cross-sectional and longitudinal classification methods; cross-sectional FH identified an additional 4.0%, and longitudinal fundal height identified a separate, additional 4.5%.Using cross-sectional FH as an ultrasound trigger, EFW had a PPV and NPV for SGA of 69 and 92%, respectively. After adding longitudinal FH, PPV increased to 74%, whereas NPV of 92% remained unchanged; however, the number of women who underwent triggered EFW decreased from 9.7 to 5.7%.Conclusion An innovative approach for calculating longitudinal FH to the standard cross-sectional FH improved identification of SGA birthweight, while simultaneously reducing the number of triggered ultrasounds. As an essentially free-of-charge screening test, our novel method has potential to decrease costs as well as perinatal morbidity and mortality (through better prediction of SGA).Key points· We have developed an innovative calculator for fundal height trajectory.. · Longitudinal fundal height improves detection of SGA.. · As a low cost screening test, the fundal height calculator may decrease costs and morbidity through better prediction of SGA..

Dataset Information

The combination of symphysis-fundal height and abdominal circumference as a novel predictor of macrosomia in GDM and normal pregnancy.

Publications

The combination of symphysis-fundal height and abdominal circumference as a novel predictor of macrosomia in GDM and normal pregnancy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets