Dataset Information

Parametric Statistical Inference for Comparing Means and Variances.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The purpose of this tutorial is to provide visual scientists with various approaches for comparing two or more groups of data using parametric statistical tests, which require that the distribution of data within each group is normal (Gaussian). Non-parametric tests are used for inference when the sample data are not normally distributed or the sample is too small to assess its true distribution.

Methods

Methods are reviewed using retinal thickness, as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), as an example for comparing two or more group means. The following parametric statistical approaches are presented for different situations: two-sample t-test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), paired t-test, and the analysis of repeated measures data using a linear mixed-effects model approach.

Results

Analyzing differences between means using various approaches is demonstrated, and follow-up procedures to analyze pairwise differences between means when there are more than two comparison groups are discussed. The assumption of equal variance between groups and methods to test for equal variances are examined. Examples of repeated measures analysis for right and left eyes on subjects, across spatial segments within the same eye (e.g. quadrants of each retina), and over time are given.

Conclusions

This tutorial outlines parametric inference tests for comparing means of two or more groups and discusses how to interpret the output from statistical software packages. Critical assumptions made by the tests and ways of checking these assumptions are discussed. Efficient study designs increase the likelihood of detecting differences between groups if such differences exist. Situations commonly encountered by vision scientists involve repeated measures from the same subject over time, measurements on both right and left eyes from the same subject, and measurements from different locations within the same eye. Repeated measurements are usually correlated, and the statistical analysis needs to account for the correlation. Doing this the right way helps to ensure rigor so that the results can be repeated and validated.

SUBMITTER: Ledolter J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7425781 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, has limited treatment options. Emerging disease modifying therapies are targeted at clearing amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates and slowing the rate of amyloid deposition. However, amyloid burden is not routinely evaluated quantitatively for purposes of disease progression and treatment response assessment. Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) is a technique comparing single-subject Positron Emission Tomography (PET) to a healthy cohort that may improve quantification of amyloid burden and diagnostic performance. While primarily used in 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET, SPM's utility in amyloid PET for AD diagnosis is less established and uncertainty remains regarding optimal normal database construction. Using commercially available SPM software, we created a database of 34 non-APOE ε4 carriers with normal cognitive testing (MMSE > 25) and negative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers. We compared this database to 115 cognitively normal subjects with variable AD risk factors. We hypothesized that SPM based on our database would identify more positive scans in the test cohort than the qualitatively rated [11C]-PiB PET (QR-PiB), that SPM-based interpretation would correlate better with CSF Aβ42 levels than QR-PiB, and that regional z-scores of specific brain regions known to be involved early in AD would be predictive of CSF Aβ42 levels. Fisher's exact test and the kappa coefficient assessed the agreement between SPM, QR-PiB PET, and CSF biomarkers. Logistic regression determined if the regional z-scores predicted CSF Aβ42 levels. An optimal z-score cutoff was calculated using Youden's index. We found SPM identified more positive scans than QR-PiB PET (19.1 vs. 9.6%) and that SPM correlated more closely with CSF Aβ42 levels than QR-PiB PET (kappa 0.13 vs. 0.06) indicating that SPM may have higher sensitivity than standard QR-PiB PET images. Regional analysis demonstrated the z-scores of the precuneus, anterior cingulate and posterior cingulate were predictive of CSF Aβ42 levels [OR (95% CI) 2.4 (1.1, 5.1) p = 0.024; 1.8 (1.1, 2.8) p = 0.020; 1.6 (1.1, 2.5) p = 0.026]. This study demonstrates the utility of using SPM with a "true normal" database and suggests that SPM enhances diagnostic performance in AD in the clinical setting through its quantitative approach, which will be increasingly important with future disease-modifying therapies.