Dataset Information

Clinical outcomes after isolated pelvic failure in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:To describe clinical outcomes in patients with isolated pelvic failures after definitive radiation treatment for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS:Cervical cancer patients with isolated pelvic failure after definitive radiation with brachytherapy boost were identified in a tertiary academic center database from 1997 to 2016. All patients received an FDG-PET scan prior to their initial treatment and at the time of their first recurrence. Isolated failures in the cervix or pelvic nodes were biopsy-proven. Distant failure and overall survival (OS) were censored outcomes. RESULTS:Isolated pelvic failure was detected in 67(11%) out of 607 consecutive patients treated with external beam pelvic radiation and brachytherapy boost. The median time to isolated pelvic recurrence was 9?months (range 3-198). Median follow-up time for patients alive after isolated pelvic recurrence was 40?months (range 0.6-183). Of these 67 patients, 28(42%) received salvage surgery, 17(25%) received chemotherapy alone, and 22(33%) received neither surgery nor chemotherapy. The median time to distant failure after isolated pelvic failure was 20?months (95% CI 3-37), with no significant difference between patients treated surgically vs. non-surgically. FDG-avid pelvic and para-aortic nodes at initial presentation were associated with worse distant control after isolated pelvic failure (HR?=?3.4, 95% CI 1.0-12). Median OS for patients treated with surgery, chemotherapy alone, and neither surgery nor chemotherapy was 29?months (95% CI 16-41), 12?months (95% CI 3-21), and 3?months (95% CI 1-5), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who have pelvic and para-aortic nodal disease at initial presentation are at higher risk of failing distantly after isolated pelvic failure, which should be considered when counseling patients on aggressive surgical salvage. Surgical salvage was associated with prolonged survival after isolated pelvic failure.

SUBMITTER: Lin AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7428083 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical outcomes after isolated pelvic failure in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation.

Lin Alexander J AJ Ma Sirui S Markovina Stephanie S Schwarz Julie J Mutch David G DG Powell Matthew A MA Grigsby Perry W PW

Gynecologic oncology 20190321 3

<h4>Purpose</h4>To describe clinical outcomes in patients with isolated pelvic failures after definitive radiation treatment for cervical cancer.<h4>Methods and materials</h4>Cervical cancer patients with isolated pelvic failure after definitive radiation with brachytherapy boost were identified in a tertiary academic center database from 1997 to 2016. All patients received an FDG-PET scan prior to their initial treatment and at the time of their first recurrence. Isolated failures in the cervix ...[more]

PMID: 30905434

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose Anal cancer affects a disproportionate percentage of persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We analyzed a cohort of patients with HIV and anal cancer who received modern radiation therapy (RT) and concurrent chemotherapy to assess whether certain factors are associated with poor oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of 75 consecutive patients with HIV infection and anal cancer who received definitive chemotherapy and RT from 2008 to 2018 at a single academic institution. Local recurrence, overall survival, changes in CD4 counts, and toxicities were investigated. Results Most patients were male (92%) with large representation from Black patients (77%). The median pretreatment CD4 count was 280 cells/mm3, which was persistently lower at 6 and 12 months’ posttreatment, 87 cells/mm3 and 182 cells/mm3, respectively (P < .001). Most (92%) patients received intensity modulated RT; median dose was 54 Gy (Range, 46.8-59.4 Gy). At a median follow-up 5.4 years (Range, 4.37-6.21 years), 20 (27%) patients had disease recurrence and 10 (13%) had isolated local failures. Nine patients died due to progressive disease. In multivariable analysis, clinically node negative involvement was significantly associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-1.00, P = .049). Acute grade 2 and 3 skin toxicities were common, at 83% and 19%, respectively. Acute grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicities were 9% and 3%, respectively. Acute grade 3 hematologic toxicity was 20%, and one grade 5 toxicity was reported. Several late grade 3 toxicities persisted: gastrointestinal (24%), skin (17%), and hematologic (6%). Two late grade 5 toxicities were noted. Conclusions Most patients with HIV and anal cancer did not experience local recurrence; however, acute and late toxicities were common. CD4 counts at 6 and 12 months’ posttreatment remained lower than pretreatment CD4 counts. Further attention to treatment of the HIV-infected population is needed.

Project description:There is limited high-quality research investigating the efficacy of palliative radiation (PPR) with regard to symptoms and quality of life (QOL) among cancer patients with pelvic soft tissue tumors. As a result, clinicians are left with mainly retrospective studies, without reliable data on which to base treatment decisions. As a first step of a subsequent analysis of PPR's efficacy, we aimed to determine whether it is feasible to prospectively measure symptoms and QOL among patients treated with PPR. A secondary aim was to explore patients' willingness to answer existential questions in the setting of palliative pelvic radiation.Patients referred for palliative radiation of soft-tissue pelvic tumors were invited to enter the study. Symptoms were scored by study physicians and QOL was assessed by the EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire and site specific modules (PR25, CR38 or BL24) prior to start of radiation and 6 and 12 weeks after its completion. In addition, patients answered existential questions at each of the study visits. A radiation therapist was available to participants in order to answer their questions and ensure that questionnaires were completed.Five female and 17 male patients with prostate cancer (14), colorectal cancer (5) and bladder cancer (3) were included in the study. The median age of the participants was 75 years (range 62-90). Twenty patients were still in the study at the 6-week follow-up and 18 patients at the 12-week follow-up. Twenty-one patients had valid responses within all the EORTC QLQ C-30 scales at baseline, 20/20 at the 6-week follow-up and at the 12-week follow-up 17/18 patients still in the study had valid responses within all scales. This level of response was similar in the site-specific modules and among the existential questions.Among patients with prostate, colorectal and bladder cancer, compliance to questionnaires assessing symptoms, QOL and existential questions 6 and 12 weeks after PPR is sufficient to enable evaluation in a larger and more homogeneous patient group in order to reach clinically valid conclusions as to the efficacy of PPR.

Project description:PurposeVariability exists in the adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer (EC) based on surgical pathology and institutional preference. The radiosensitivity index (RSI) is a previously validated multigene expression index that estimates tumor radiosensitivity. We evaluate RSI as a genomic predictor for pelvic failure (PF) in EC patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT).Methods and materialsUsing our institutional tissue biorepository, we identified EC patients treated between January 1999 and April 2011 with primarily endometrioid histology (n = 176; 86%) who received various adjuvant therapies. The RSI 10-gene signature was calculated for each sample using the previously published algorithm. Radiophenotype was determined using the previously identified cutpoint where RSI ≥ 0.375 denotes radioresistance (RR) and RSI < 0.375 describes radiosensitivity.ResultsA total of 204 patients were identified, of which 83 (41%) were treated with adjuvant RT. Median follow-up was 38.5 months. All patients underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with the majority undergoing lymph node dissection (n = 181; 88%). In patients treated with radiation, RR tumors were more likely to experience PF (3-year pelvic control 84% vs 100%; P = .02) with worse PF-free survival (PFFS) (3-year PFFS 65% vs 89%; P = .04). Furthermore, in the patients who did not receive RT, there was no difference in PF (P = .87) or PFFS (P = .57) between the RR/radiosensitive tumors. On multivariable analysis, factors that continued to predict for PF included the RR phenotype (hazard ratio [HR], 12.2; P = .003), lymph node involvement (HR, 4.4; P = .02), and serosal or adnexal involvement (HR, 5.3; P = .01).ConclusionsOn multivariable analysis, RSI was found to be a significant predictor of PF in patients treated with adjuvant RT. We propose using RSI to predict which patients are at higher risk for failing in the pelvis and may be candidates for treatment escalation in the adjuvant setting.

Dataset Information

Clinical outcomes after isolated pelvic failure in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation.

Publications

Clinical outcomes after isolated pelvic failure in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets