Dataset Information

Patterns of failure and clinical outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Because of the scarcity of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC), data for this disease entity is limited. We aim to evaluate the outcomes, prognostic factors and failure patterns of CEC treated by contemporary radiotherapy (RT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 86 CEC patients consecutively treated between 2007 and 2015 by definitive RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. RT was mainly delivered with Intensity Modulated Irradiation Therapy (IMRT) or Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Statistical analyses were performed on survival, prognostic factors and failure patterns.

Results

The median follow-up time was 19.4 months. The 3-year overall survival (OS), local regional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastatic free survival (DMFS), and progression free survival (PFS) were 53.6%, 57.9%, 81.5% and 41.5%, respectively. Independent predictors for poorer OS were N stage, hoarseness and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node (RLN) involvement, and predictors for LRFFS were N stage and EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction) to gross tumor volume (GTV), with ? 66Gy achieving local control of 94.7%. Patients receiving elective nodal irradiation (ENI) had better nodal regional control than those receiving involved field irradiation (IFI). 31 (36%) patients had treatment failure and 15 (17.4%), 8 (9.3%) and 14 (16.2%) patients had local, regional, and distant failure, respectively. 86.7% (13/15) local failures were within GTV, and supraclavicular region (62.5%, 5/8) was the most common regional failure site. No severe toxicities were observed.

Conclusions

Our results seem to indicate that good locoregional control might be achieved for CEC with adequate radiation dose and treatment planning approaches.

SUBMITTER: Zhao L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5400628 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patterns of failure and clinical outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer.

Zhao Lina L Zhou Yongchun Y Mu Yunfeng Y Chai Guangjin G Xiao Feng F Tan Lina L Lin Steven H SH Shi Mei M

Oncotarget 20170301 13

<h4>Purpose</h4>Because of the scarcity of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC), data for this disease entity is limited. We aim to evaluate the outcomes, prognostic factors and failure patterns of CEC treated by contemporary radiotherapy (RT).<h4>Methods</h4>We retrospectively analyzed 86 CEC patients consecutively treated between 2007 and 2015 by definitive RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. RT was mainly delivered with Intensity Modulated Irradiation Therapy (IMRT) or Volumetric-Modulate ...[more]

PMID: 28423530

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDefinitive radiotherapy has become a more common treatment for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC), but data about long-term clinical outcomes is still relatively sparse. The purpose of this study was to describe long-term clinical outcomes after definitive radiotherapy for CESCC, and identify the prognostic factors influencing these outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients who received definitive radiotherapy for CESCC at our institution between 2006 and 2014. The overall survival (OS) rate, locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) rate, and toxicities were retrospectively evaluated during long-term follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.ResultsA total of 120 patients were included for analysis. The median prescribed radiation dose for the gross tumor and metastatic lymph nodes was 60 Gy. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) was performed on 99 patients (83%); 90 patients (75%) received concurrent chemotherapy. The OS rates were 22.7% at 5 years and 14.9% at 8 years. The LRFFS rates at 3, 5, and 8 years were 27.5%, 21.7%, and 15.0%, respectively. The univariate analysis suggested that N classification and non-regional lymph node metastasis (M1Lym) status were independent risk factors for overall survival (P<0.01). A dose of more than 60 Gy didn't have a statistically significant influence in the multivariate analysis, although a total dose of more than 60 Gy was associated with improved survival in the univariate analysis. Concurrent chemotherapy was not associated with OS or LRFFS time in the univariate or multivariate analysis. A total of 74 patients (61.7%) experienced locoregional treatment failure. The most commonly documented acute toxicities were grade 1 and grade 2 toxicities in 61 patients (50.8%). There were 2 patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism as a late toxicity event.ConclusionsDefinitive radiotherapy is a reasonable curative treatment option with laryngopharyngeal preservation for CESCC patients. Radical treatments for lymph node metastases may improve the OS and LRFFS times. Monitoring for thyroid function may be warranted during long-term follow-up.

Project description:BackgroundThe literature regarding pericardial effusion after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for esophageal cancer was lacking. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of pericardial effusion in esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT.MethodsA total of 126 consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. The pericardial effusion was determined on computed tomography scan of the chest and graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups by the log-rank test. The risk factors of pericardial effusion were determined with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 14.0 months. Thirty-seven (29.4%) patients had pericardial effusion after a median interval of 6.6 months since the end of IMRT. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion of any grade was higher in patients with mean heart dose > 23.45 Gy (p = 0.00018), heart V30 > 33.55% (p = 0.00015), mean pericardium dose > 20.33 Gy (p = 0.00027), and pericardium V20 > 42.55% (p = 0.00018). Furthermore, eight (6.3%) patients had symptoms related to pericardial effusion and were considered as cases with pericardial effusion ≥ grade 3. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion ≥ grade 3 was higher in patients with pericardium V30 > 65.80% (p = 0.00028), V40 > 55.35% (p < 0.0001), and V60 > 24.70% (p = 0.0021). Multivariate analyses showed the above dose-volume parameters predicted the risk of pericardial effusion in esophageal cancer.ConclusionsDose-volume parameters predicting the risk of pericardial effusion were identified in esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT. They could be applied as constraints of IMRT for esophageal cancer.

Dataset Information

Patterns of failure and clinical outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Patterns of failure and clinical outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets