Dataset Information

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for antibiotic stewardship in suspected pneumonia.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Multiplexed molecular rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may allow for rapid and accurate diagnosis of the microbial etiology of pneumonia. However, little data are available on multiplexed RDTs in pneumonia and their impact on clinical practice. METHODS:This retrospective study analyzed 659 hospitalized patients for microbiological diagnosis of suspected pneumonia. RESULTS:The overall sensitivity of the Unyvero LRT Panel was 85.7% (95% CI 82.3-88.7) and the overall specificity was 98.4% (95% CI 98.2-98.7) with a negative predictive value of 97.9% (95% CI 97.6-98.1). The LRT Panel result predicted no change in antibiotics in 12.4% of cases but antibiotic de-escalation in 65.9% (405/615) of patients, of whom 278/405 (69%) had unnecessary MRSA coverage and 259/405 (64%) had unnecessary P. aeruginosa coverage. INTERPRETATION:In hospitalized adults with suspected pneumonia, use of an RDT on respiratory samples can allow for early adjustment of initial antibiotics, most commonly de-escalation.

SUBMITTER: Pickens C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7428672 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for antibiotic stewardship in suspected pneumonia.

Pickens Chiagozie C Wunderink Richard G RG Qi Chao C Mopuru Haritha H Donnelly Helen H Powell Kimberly K Sims Matthew D MD

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 20200816 4

<h4>Background</h4>Multiplexed molecular rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may allow for rapid and accurate diagnosis of the microbial etiology of pneumonia. However, little data are available on multiplexed RDTs in pneumonia and their impact on clinical practice.<h4>Methods</h4>This retrospective study analyzed 659 hospitalized patients for microbiological diagnosis of suspected pneumonia.<h4>Results</h4>The overall sensitivity of the Unyvero LRT Panel was 85.7% (95% CI 82.3-88.7) and the overall s ...[more]

PMID: 32927409

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRapid and accurate detection of pathogens is needed in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to enable appropriate antibiotics and to slow the development of antibiotic resistance. We aimed to compare the effect of point-of-care (POC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of respiratory pathogens added to standard care with standard care only (SCO) on antibiotic prescriptions after acute hospital admission.Methods and findingsWe performed a superiority, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in 3 Danish medical emergency departments (EDs) from March 2021 to February 2022. Adults acutely admitted with suspected CAP during the daytime on weekdays were included and randomly assigned (1:1) to POC-PCR (The Biofire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus added to standard care) or SCO (routine culture and, if requested by the attending physician, target-specific PCR) analysis of respiratory samples. We randomly assigned 294 patients with successfully collected samples (tracheal secretion 78.4% or expectorated sputum 21.6%) to POC-PCR (n = 148, 50.4%) or SCO (146, 49.6%). Patients and investigators owning the data were blinded to the allocation and test results. Outcome adjudicators and clinical staff at the ED were not blinded to allocation and test results but were together with the statistician, blinded to data management and analysis. Laboratory staff performing standard care analyses was blinded to allocation. The study coordinator was not blinded. Intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis were performed using logistic regression with Huber-White clustered standard errors for the prescription of antibiotic treatment. Loss to follow-up comprises 3 patients in the POC-PCR (2%) and none in the SCO group. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in the primary outcome of prescriptions of no or narrow-spectrum antibiotics at 4 h after admission for the POC-PCR (n = 91, 62.8%) odds ratio (OR) 1.13; (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.96, 1.34] p = 0.134) and SCO (n = 87, 59.6%). Secondary outcomes showed that prescriptions were significantly more targeted at 4-h OR 5.68; (95% CI [2.49, 12.94] p < 0.001) and 48-h OR 4.20; (95% CI [1.87, 9.40] p < 0.001) and more adequate at 48-h OR 2.11; (95% CI [1.23, 3.61] p = 0.006) and on day 5 in the POC-PCR group OR 1.40; (95% CI [1.18, 1.66] p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in relation to intensive care unit (ICU) admissions OR 0.54; (95% CI [0.10, 2.91] p = 0.475), readmission within 30 days OR 0.90; (95% CI [0.43, 1.86] p = 0.787), length of stay (LOS) IRR 0.82; (95% CI [0.63, 1.07] p = 0.164), 30 days mortality OR 1.24; (95% CI [0.32, 4.82] p = 0.749), and in-hospital mortality OR 0.98; (95% CI [0.19, 5.06] p = 0.986).ConclusionsIn a setting with an already restrictive use of antibiotics, adding POC-PCR to the diagnostic setup did not increase the number of patients treated with narrow-spectrum or without antibiotics. POC-PCR may result in a more targeted and adequate use of antibiotics. A significant study limitation was the concurrent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulting in an unusually low transmission of respiratory virus.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04651712).

Project description:Background and objectivesThe variable response of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes towards anti-viral treatment requires prior information on the genotype status before planning a therapeutic strategy. Although assays for typing or subtyping of HCV are available, however, a fast and reliable assay system is still needed. The present study was planned to develop a single-step multiplex quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay to determine HCV genotypes in patients' sera.MethodsThe conserved sequences from 5' UTR, core and NS5b regions of HCV genome were used to design primers and hydrolysis probes labeled with fluorophores. Starting with the standardization of singleplex (qPCR) for each individual HCV-genotype, the experimental conditions were finally optimized for the development of multiplex assay. The sensitivity and specificity were assessed both for singleplex and multiplex assays. Using the template concentration of 102 copies per microliter, the value of quantification cycle (Cq) and the limit of detection (LOD) were also compared for both singleplex and multiplex assays. Similarly, the merit of multiplex assay was also compared with sequence analysis and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) techniques used for HCV genotyping. In order to find the application of multiplex qPCR assay, it was used for genotyping in a panel of 98 sera positive for HCV RNA after screening a total number of 239 patients with various liver diseases.ResultsThe results demonstrated the presence of genotype 1 in 26 of 98 (26.53%) sera, genotype 3 in 65 (66.32%) and genotype 4 in 2 (2.04%) sera samples, respectively. One sample showed mixed infection of genotype 1 and 3. Five samples could not show the presence of any genotype. Genotypes 2, 5 and 6 could not be detected in these sera samples. The analysis of sera by singleplex and RFLP indicated the results of multiplex to be comparable with singleplex and with clear merit of multiplex over RFLP. In addition, the results of multiplex assay were also found to be comparable with those from sequence analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, Cq values and LOD values were compared and found to be closely associated both for singleplex and multiplex assays.ConclusionThe multiplex qPCR assay was found to be a fast, specific and sensitive method that can be used as a technique of choice for HCV genotyping in all routine laboratories.

Dataset Information

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for antibiotic stewardship in suspected pneumonia.

Publications

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for antibiotic stewardship in suspected pneumonia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets