Dataset Information

Productive HIV infection in astrocytes can be established via a nonclassical mechanism.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Astrocytes are proposed to be a critical reservoir of HIV in the brain. However, HIV infection of astrocytes is inefficient in vitro except for cell-to-cell transmission from HIV-infected cells. Here, we explore mechanisms by which cell-free HIV bypasses entry and postentry barriers leading to a productive infection.

Methods

HIV infection of astrocytes was investigated by a variety of techniques including transfection of CD4-expressing plasmid, treatment with lysosomotropic agents or using a transwell culture system loaded with HIV-infected lymphocytes. Infection was monitored by HIV-1 p24 in culture supernatants and integrated proviral DNA was quantified by Alu-PCR.

Results

Persistent HIV infection could be established in astrocytes by transfection of proviral DNA, transduction with VSV-G-pseudotyped viruses, transient expression of CD4 followed by HIV infection, or simultaneous treatment with lysosomotropic chloroquine or Tat-HA2 peptide with HIV infection. In absence of these treatments, HIV entered via endocytosis as seen by electronmicroscopy and underwent lysosomal degradation without proviral integration, indicating endocytosis is a dead end for HIV in astrocytes. Nevertheless, productive infection was observed when astrocytes were in close proximity but physically separated from HIV-infected lymphocytes in the transwell cultures. This occurred with X4 or dual tropic R5X4 viruses and was blocked by an antibody or antagonist to CXCR4.

Conclusion

A CD4-independent, CXCR4-dependent mechanism of viral entry is proposed, by which immature HIV particles from infected lymphocytes might directly bind to CXCR4 on astrocytes and trigger virus--cell fusion during or after the process of viral maturation. This mechanism may contribute to the formation of brain HIV reservoirs.

SUBMITTER: Li GH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7429268 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Latently infected CD4 T cells form a stable reservoir of HIV that leads to life-long viral persistence; the mechanisms involved in establishment of this latency are not well understood. Three scenarios have been proposed: 1) an activated, proliferating cell becomes infected and reverts back to a resting state; 2) an activated cell becomes infected during its return to resting; or 3) infection is established directly in a resting cell. The aim of this study was, therefore, to investigate the relationship between T cell activation and proliferation and the establishment of HIV latency. Isolated primary CD4 cells were infected at different time points before or after TCR-induced stimulation. Cell proliferation within acutely infected cultures was tracked using CFSE viable dye over 14 days; and cell subsets that underwent varying degrees of proliferation were isolated at end of culture by flow cytometric sorting. Recovered cell subpopulations were analyzed for the amount of integrated HIV DNA, and the ability to produce virus, upon a second round of cell stimulation. We show that cell cultures exposed to virus, prior to stimulus addition, contained the highest levels of integrated and replication-competent provirus after returning to quiescence; whereas, cells infected during the height of cell proliferation retained the least. Cells that did not divide or exhibited limited division, following virus exposure and stimulation contained greater amounts of integrated and inducible HIV than did cells that had divided many times. Based on these results, co-culture experiments were conducted to demonstrate that latent infection could be established directly in non-dividing cells via cell-to-cell transmission from autologous productively infected cells. Together, the findings from our studies implicate the likely importance of direct infection of sub-optimally activated T cells in establishment of latently infected reservoirs in vivo, especially in CD4 lymphocytes that surround productive viral foci within immune tissue microenvironments.

Project description:BACKGROUND:HIV-infected cell lines are widely used to study latent HIV infection, which is considered the main barrier to HIV cure. We hypothesized that these cell lines differ from each other and from cells from HIV-infected individuals in the mechanisms underlying latency. RESULTS:To quantify the degree to which HIV expression is inhibited by blocks at different stages of HIV transcription, we employed a recently-described panel of RT-ddPCR assays to measure levels of 7 HIV transcripts ("read-through," initiated, 5' elongated, mid-transcribed/unspliced [Pol], distal-transcribed [Nef], polyadenylated, and multiply-sliced [Tat-Rev]) in bulk populations of latently-infected (U1, ACH-2, J-Lat) and productively-infected (8E5, activated J-Lat) cell lines. To assess single-cell variation and investigate cellular genes associated with HIV transcriptional blocks, we developed a novel multiplex qPCR panel and quantified single cell levels of 7 HIV targets and 89 cellular transcripts in latently- and productively-infected cell lines. The bulk cell HIV transcription profile differed dramatically between cell lines and cells from ART-suppressed individuals. Compared to cells from ART-suppressed individuals, latent cell lines showed lower levels of HIV transcriptional initiation and higher levels of polyadenylation and splicing. ACH-2 and J-Lat cells showed different forms of transcriptional interference, while U1 cells showed a block to elongation. Single-cell studies revealed marked variation between/within cell lines in expression of HIV transcripts, T cell phenotypic markers, antiviral factors, and genes implicated in latency. Expression of multiply-spliced HIV Tat-Rev was associated with expression of cellular genes involved in activation, tissue retention, T cell transcription, and apoptosis/survival. CONCLUSIONS:HIV-infected cell lines differ from each other and from cells from ART-treated individuals in the mechanisms governing latent HIV infection. These differences in viral and cellular gene expression must be considered when gauging the suitability of a given cell line for future research on HIV. At the same time, some features were shared across cell lines, such as low expression of antiviral defense genes and a relationship between productive infection and genes involved in survival. These features may contribute to HIV latency or persistence in vivo, and deserve further study using novel single cell assays such as those described in this manuscript.