Dataset Information

Amyloidogenic Propensities of Ribosomal S1 Proteins: Bioinformatics Screening and Experimental Checking.

ABSTRACT: Structural S1 domains belong to the superfamily of oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide-binding fold domains, which are highly conserved from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes and able to function in RNA binding. An important feature of this family is the presence of several copies of the structural domain, the number of which is determined in a strictly limited range from one to six. Despite the strong tendency for the aggregation of several amyloidogenic regions in the family of the ribosomal S1 proteins, their fibril formation process is still poorly understood. Here, we combined computational and experimental approaches for studying some features of the amyloidogenic regions in this protein family. The FoldAmyloid, Waltz, PASTA 2.0 and Aggrescan programs were used to assess the amyloidogenic propensities in the ribosomal S1 proteins and to identify such regions in various structural domains. The thioflavin T fluorescence assay and electron microscopy were used to check the chosen amyloidogenic peptides' ability to form fibrils. The bioinformatics tools were used to study the amyloidogenic propensities in 1331 ribosomal S1 proteins. We found that amyloidogenicity decreases with increasing sizes of proteins. Inside one domain, the amyloidogenicity is higher in the terminal parts. We selected and synthesized 11 amyloidogenic peptides from the Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus ribosomal S1 proteins and checked their ability to form amyloids using the thioflavin T fluorescence assay and electron microscopy. All 11 amyloidogenic peptides form amyloid-like fibrils. The described specific amyloidogenic regions are actually responsible for the fibrillogenesis process and may be potential targets for modulating the amyloid properties of bacterial ribosomal S1 proteins.

SUBMITTER: Grishin SY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7432502 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Amyloidogenic Propensities of Ribosomal S1 Proteins: Bioinformatics Screening and Experimental Checking.

Grishin Sergei Y SY Deryusheva Evgeniya I EI Machulin Andrey V AV Selivanova Olga M OM Glyakina Anna V AV Gorbunova Elena Y EY Mustaeva Leila G LG Azev Vyacheslav N VN Rekstina Valentina V VV Kalebina Tatyana S TS Surin Alexey K AK Galzitskaya Oxana V OV

International journal of molecular sciences 20200722 15

Structural S1 domains belong to the superfamily of oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide-binding fold domains, which are highly conserved from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes and able to function in RNA binding. An important feature of this family is the presence of several copies of the structural domain, the number of which is determined in a strictly limited range from one to six. Despite the strong tendency for the aggregation of several amyloidogenic regions in the family of the ribosomal S1 pro ...[more]

PMID: 32707977

Similar Datasets

Project description:The advancement in site-directed spin labeling of proteins has enabled EPR studies to expand into newer research areas within the umbrella of protein-membrane interactions. Recently, membrane remodeling by amyloidogenic and non-amyloidogenic proteins has gained a substantial interest in relation to driving and controlling vital cellular processes such as endocytosis, exocytosis, shaping of organelles like endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi and mitochondria, intracellular vesicular trafficking, formation of filopedia and multivesicular bodies, mitochondrial fusion and fission, and synaptic vesicle fusion and recycling in neurotransmission. Misregulation in any of these processes due to an aberrant protein (mutation or misfolding) or alteration of lipid metabolism can be detrimental to the cell and cause disease. Dissection of the structural basis of membrane remodeling by proteins is thus quite necessary for an understanding of the underlying mechanisms, but it remains a formidable task due to the difficulties of various common biophysical tools in monitoring the dynamic process of membrane binding and bending by proteins. This is largely since membranes generally complicate protein structure analysis and this problem is amplified for structural analysis in the presence of different types of membrane curvatures. Recent EPR studies on membrane remodeling by proteins show that a significant structural information can be generated to delineate the role of different protein modules, domains and individual amino acids in the generation of membrane curvature. These studies also show how EPR can complement the data obtained by high resolution techniques such as X-ray and NMR. This perspective covers the application of EPR in recent studies for understanding membrane remodeling by amyloidogenic and non-amyloidogenic proteins that is useful for researchers interested in using or complimenting EPR to gain better understanding of membrane remodeling. We also discuss how a single protein can generate different type of membrane curvatures using specific conformations for specific membrane structures and how EPR is a versatile tool well-suited to analyze subtle alterations in structures under such modifying conditions which otherwise would have been difficult using other biophysical tools.

Project description:BackgroundImmune cells play an integral role in the development and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study was to identify immune-cell-related biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD.Methods and findingsFirst, we introduced human liver transcriptome data from the GEO database (GSE48452 and GSE126848) and performed a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to screen out the modules related to immune cell infiltration and to identify immune-cell-related differentially expressed genes (ICR-DEGs) associated with NAFLD progression. Further, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of ICR-DEGs was established to obtain hub genes and subsequently, the expression trend analysis was conducted to identify immune-cell-related biomarkers of NAFLD. Finally, the mRNA expression of biomarkers was validated in a NAFLD mouse model induced by high-fat diet (HFD) feeding. In total, we identified 66 ICR-DEGs and 13 hub genes associated with NAFLD. Among them, 9 hub genes (CD247, CD74, FCGR2B, IL2RB, INPP5D, MRPL16, RPL35, RPS3A, RPS8) were correlated with the infiltrating immune cells by the Pearson correlation analysis. Subsequently, 4 immune-cell-related biomarkers (RPL35, RPS3A, RPS8, and MRPL16) with the same expression trends in GSE48452 and GSE126848 datasets were identified. These biomarkers were enriched in immune-related pathways and had a good ability to distinguish between NASH and healthy samples. Moreover, we constructed a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network of biomarkers and predicted twenty potential therapeutic drugs targeting RPS3A such as taxifolin and sitagliptin. Finally, experimental validation indicated that the hepatic mRNA expression of Rpl35, Rps3A, and Rps8 was significantly decreased in NAFLD mice.ConclusionsThis study identified four ribosomal protein genes (RPL35, RPS3A, RPS8, and MRPL16) as immune-cell-related biomarkers of NAFLD, which may actively participate in the immune processes during NAFLD progression and could serve as potential targets for the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD.

Dataset Information

Amyloidogenic Propensities of Ribosomal S1 Proteins: Bioinformatics Screening and Experimental Checking.

Publications

Amyloidogenic Propensities of Ribosomal S1 Proteins: Bioinformatics Screening and Experimental Checking.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets