Clustering and classification methods for single-cell RNA-sequencing data.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Qi R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7444317 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Clustering and classification methods for single-cell RNA-sequencing data.
Qi Ren R Ma Anjun A Ma Qin Q Zou Quan Q
Briefings in bioinformatics 20200701 4
Appropriate ways to measure the similarity between single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data are ubiquitous in bioinformatics, but using single clustering or classification methods to process scRNA-seq data is generally difficult. This has led to the emergence of integrated methods and tools that aim to automatically process specific problems associated with scRNA-seq data. These approaches have attracted a lot of interest in bioinformatics and related fields. In this paper, we systematically ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNAseq) is a powerful tool to study heterogeneity of cells. Recently, several clustering based methods have been proposed to identify distinct cell populations. These methods are based on different statistical models and usually require to perform several additional steps, such as preprocessing or dimension reduction, before applying the clustering algorithm. Individual steps are often controlled by method-specific parameters, permitting the method to be used in different modes on the same datasets, depending on the user choices. The large number of possibilities that these methods provide can intimidate non-expert users, since the available choices are not always clearly documented. In addition, to date, no large studies have invistigated the role and the impact that these choices can have in different experimental contexts. This work aims to provide new insights into the advantages and drawbacks of scRNAseq clustering methods and describe the ranges of possibilities that are offered to users. In particular, we provide an extensive evaluation of several methods with respect to different modes of usage and parameter settings by applying them to real and simulated datasets that vary in terms of dimensionality, number of cell populations or levels of noise. Remarkably, the results presented here show that great variability in the performance of the models is strongly attributed to the choice of the user-specific parameter settings. We describe several tendencies in the performance attributed to their modes of usage and different types of datasets, and identify which methods are strongly affected by data dimensionality in terms of computational time. Finally, we highlight some open challenges in scRNAseq data clustering, such as those related to the identification of the number of clusters.
| S-EPMC6918801 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides new opportunities to gain a mechanistic understanding of many biological processes. Current approaches for single cell clustering are often sensitive to the input parameters and have difficulty dealing with cell types with different densities. Here, we present Panoramic View (PanoView), an iterative method integrated with a novel density-based clustering, Ordering Local Maximum by Convex hull (OLMC), that uses a heuristic approach to estimate the required parameters based on the input data structures. In each iteration, PanoView will identify the most confident cell clusters and repeat the clustering with the remaining cells in a new PCA space. Without adjusting any parameter in PanoView, we demonstrated that PanoView was able to detect major and rare cell types simultaneously and outperformed other existing methods in both simulated datasets and published single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets. Finally, we conducted scRNA-Seq analysis of embryonic mouse hypothalamus, and PanoView was able to reveal known cell types and several rare cell subpopulations.
| S-EPMC6742414 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMany cancer genomes have been known to contain more than one subclone inside one tumor, the phenomenon of which is called intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH). Characterizing ITH is essential in designing treatment plans, prognosis as well as the study of cancer progression. Single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq) has been proven effective in deciphering ITH. Cells corresponding to each subclone are supposed to carry a unique set of mutations such as single nucleotide variations (SNV). While there have been many studies on the cancer evolutionary tree reconstruction, not many have been proposed that simply characterize the subclonality without tree reconstruction. While tree reconstruction is important in the study of cancer evolutionary history, typically they are computationally expensive in terms of running time and memory consumption due to the huge search space of the tree structure. On the other hand, subclonality characterization of single cells can be converted into a cell clustering problem, the dimension of which is much smaller, and the turnaround time is much shorter. Despite the existence of a few state-of-the-art cell clustering computational tools for scDNAseq, there lacks a comprehensive and objective comparison under different settings.ResultsIn this paper, we evaluated six state-of-the-art cell clustering tools-SCG, BnpC, SCClone, RobustClone, SCITE and SBMClone-on simulated data sets given a variety of parameter settings and a real data set. We designed a simulator specifically for cell clustering, and compared these methods' performances in terms of their clustering accuracy, specificity and sensitivity and running time. For SBMClone, we specifically designed an ultra-low coverage large data set to evaluate its performance in the face of an extremely high missing rate.ConclusionFrom the benchmark study, we conclude that BnpC and SCG's clustering accuracy are the highest and comparable to each other. However, BnpC is more advantageous in terms of running time when cell number is high (> 1500). It also has a higher clustering accuracy than SCG when cluster number is high (> 16). SCClone's accuracy in estimating the number of clusters is the highest. RobustClone and SCITE's clustering accuracy are the lowest for all experiments. SCITE tends to over-estimate the cluster number and has a low specificity, whereas RobustClone tends to under-estimate the cluster number and has a much lower sensitivity than other methods. SBMClone produced reasonably good clustering (V-measure > 0.9) when coverage is > = 0.03 and thus is highly recommended for ultra-low coverage large scDNAseq data sets.
| S-EPMC10597505 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Understanding the heterogeneity of cells is an important biological question. The development of single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology provides high resolution data for such inquiry. A key challenge in scRNA-seq analysis is the high variability of measured RNA expression levels and frequent dropouts (missing values) due to limited input RNA compared to bulk RNA-seq measurement. Existing clustering methods do not perform well for these noisy and zero-inflated scRNA-seq data. In this manuscript we propose a Bayesian hierarchical model, called BasClu, to appropriately characterize important features of scRNA-seq data in order to more accurately cluster cells. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method with extensive simulation studies and applications to three real scRNA-seq datasets.
| S-EPMC8168892 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a recent high-throughput genomic technology used to study the expression dynamics of genes at single-cell level. Analyzing the scRNA-seq data in presence of biological confounding factors including dropout events is a challenging task. Thus, this article presents a novel statistical approach for various analyses of the scRNA-seq Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI) counts data. The various analyses include modeling and fitting of observed UMI data, cell type detection, estimation of cell capture rates, estimation of gene specific model parameters, estimation of the sample mean and sample variance of the genes, etc. Besides, the developed approach is able to perform differential expression, and other downstream analyses that consider the molecular capture process in scRNA-seq data modeling. Here, the external spike-ins data can also be used in the approach for better results. The unique feature of the method is that it considers the biological process that leads to severe dropout events in modeling the observed UMI counts of genes. • The differential expression analysis of observed scRNA-seq UMI counts data is performed after adjustment for cell capture rates. • The statistical approach performs downstream differential zero inflation analysis, classification of influential genes, and selection of top marker genes. • Cell auxiliaries including cell clusters and other cell variables (e.g., cell cycle, cell phase) are used to remove unwanted variation to perform statistical tests reliably.
| S-EPMC8720898 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Subpopulation identification, usually via some form of unsupervised clustering, is a fundamental step in the analysis of many single-cell RNA-seq data sets. This has motivated the development and application of a broad range of clustering methods, based on various underlying algorithms. Here, we provide a systematic and extensible performance evaluation of 14 clustering algorithms implemented in R, including both methods developed explicitly for scRNA-seq data and more general-purpose methods. The methods were evaluated using nine publicly available scRNA-seq data sets as well as three simulations with varying degree of cluster separability. The same feature selection approaches were used for all methods, allowing us to focus on the investigation of the performance of the clustering algorithms themselves. We evaluated the ability of recovering known subpopulations, the stability and the run time and scalability of the methods. Additionally, we investigated whether the performance could be improved by generating consensus partitions from multiple individual clustering methods. We found substantial differences in the performance, run time and stability between the methods, with SC3 and Seurat showing the most favorable results. Additionally, we found that consensus clustering typically did not improve the performance compared to the best of the combined methods, but that several of the top-performing methods already perform some type of consensus clustering. All the code used for the evaluation is available on GitHub ( https://github.com/markrobinsonuzh/scRNAseq_clustering_comparison). In addition, an R package providing access to data and clustering results, thereby facilitating inclusion of new methods and data sets, is available from Bioconductor ( https://bioconductor.org/packages/DuoClustering2018).
| S-EPMC6134335 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), doublets form when two cells are encapsulated into one reaction volume. The existence of doublets, which appear to be-but are not-real cells, is a key confounder in scRNA-seq data analysis. Computational methods have been developed to detect doublets in scRNA-seq data; however, the scRNA-seq field lacks a comprehensive benchmarking of these methods, making it difficult for researchers to choose an appropriate method for specific analyses. We conducted a systematic benchmark study of nine cutting-edge computational doublet-detection methods. Our study included 16 real datasets, which contained experimentally annotated doublets, and 112 realistic synthetic datasets. We compared doublet-detection methods regarding detection accuracy under various experimental settings, impacts on downstream analyses, and computational efficiencies. Our results show that existing methods exhibited diverse performance and distinct advantages in different aspects. Overall, the DoubletFinder method has the best detection accuracy, and the cxds method has the highest computational efficiency. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the Supplemental Information.
| S-EPMC7897250 | biostudies-literature
Project description:With the advent of single cell/nucleus RNA sequencing (sc/snRNA-seq), the field of cell phenotyping is now a data-driven exercise providing statistical evidence to support cell type/state categorization. However, the task of classifying cells into specific, well-defined categories with the empirical data provided by sc/snRNA-seq remains nontrivial due to the difficulty in determining specific differences between related cell types with close transcriptional similarities, resulting in challenges with matching cell types identified in separate experiments. To investigate possible approaches to overcome these obstacles, we explored the use of supervised machine learning methods-logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests, neural networks, and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM)-as approaches to classify cell types using snRNA-seq datasets from human brain middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and human kidney. Classification accuracy was evaluated using an F-beta score weighted in favor of precision to account for technical artifacts of gene expression dropout. We examined the impact of hyperparameter optimization and feature selection methods on F-beta score performance. We found that the best performing model for granular cell type classification in both datasets is a multinomial logistic regression classifier and that an effective feature selection step was the most influential factor in optimizing the performance of the machine learning pipelines.
| S-EPMC9506651 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MotivationAccurately clustering cell types from a mass of heterogeneous cells is a crucial first step for the analysis of single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-Seq) data. Although several methods have been recently developed, they utilize different characteristics of data and yield varying results in terms of both the number of clusters and actual cluster assignments.ResultsHere, we present SAFE-clustering, single-cell aggregated (From Ensemble) clustering, a flexible, accurate and robust method for clustering scRNA-Seq data. SAFE-clustering takes as input, results from multiple clustering methods, to build one consensus solution. SAFE-clustering currently embeds four state-of-the-art methods, SC3, CIDR, Seurat and t-SNE + k-means; and ensembles solutions from these four methods using three hypergraph-based partitioning algorithms. Extensive assessment across 12 datasets with the number of clusters ranging from 3 to 14, and the number of single cells ranging from 49 to 32, 695 showcases the advantages of SAFE-clustering in terms of both cluster number (18.2-58.1% reduction in absolute deviation to the truth) and cluster assignment (on average 36.0% improvement, and up to 18.5% over the best of the four methods, measured by adjusted rand index). Moreover, SAFE-clustering is computationally efficient to accommodate large datasets, taking <10 min to process 28 733 cells.Availability and implementationSAFEclustering, including source codes and tutorial, is freely available at https://github.com/yycunc/SAFEclustering.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC6477982 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSingle-cell transcriptomics is rapidly advancing our understanding of the cellular composition of complex tissues and organisms. A major limitation in most analysis pipelines is the reliance on manual annotations to determine cell identities, which are time-consuming and irreproducible. The exponential growth in the number of cells and samples has prompted the adaptation and development of supervised classification methods for automatic cell identification.ResultsHere, we benchmarked 22 classification methods that automatically assign cell identities including single-cell-specific and general-purpose classifiers. The performance of the methods is evaluated using 27 publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing datasets of different sizes, technologies, species, and levels of complexity. We use 2 experimental setups to evaluate the performance of each method for within dataset predictions (intra-dataset) and across datasets (inter-dataset) based on accuracy, percentage of unclassified cells, and computation time. We further evaluate the methods' sensitivity to the input features, number of cells per population, and their performance across different annotation levels and datasets. We find that most classifiers perform well on a variety of datasets with decreased accuracy for complex datasets with overlapping classes or deep annotations. The general-purpose support vector machine classifier has overall the best performance across the different experiments.ConclusionsWe present a comprehensive evaluation of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. All the code used for the evaluation is available on GitHub ( https://github.com/tabdelaal/scRNAseq_Benchmark ). Additionally, we provide a Snakemake workflow to facilitate the benchmarking and to support the extension of new methods and new datasets.
| S-EPMC6734286 | biostudies-literature