Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Text Processing for Detection of Fungal Ocular Involvement in Critical Care Patients: Cross-Sectional Study.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Fungal ocular involvement can develop in patients with fungal bloodstream infections and can be vision-threatening. Ocular involvement has become less common in the current era of improved antifungal therapies. Retrospectively determining the prevalence of fungal ocular involvement is important for informing clinical guidelines, such as the need for routine ophthalmologic consultations. However, manual retrospective record review to detect cases is time-consuming. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to determine the prevalence of fungal ocular involvement in a critical care database using both structured and unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data. METHODS:We queried microbiology data from 46,467 critical care patients over 12 years (2000-2012) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) to identify 265 patients with culture-proven fungemia. For each fungemic patient, demographic data, fungal species present in blood culture, and risk factors for fungemia (eg, presence of indwelling catheters, recent major surgery, diabetes, immunosuppressed status) were ascertained. All structured diagnosis codes and free-text narrative notes associated with each patient's hospitalization were also extracted. Screening for fungal endophthalmitis was performed using two approaches: (1) by querying a wide array of eye- and vision-related diagnosis codes, and (2) by utilizing a custom regular expression pipeline to identify and collate relevant text matches pertaining to fungal ocular involvement. Both approaches were validated using manual record review. The main outcome measure was the documentation of any fungal ocular involvement. RESULTS:In total, 265 patients had culture-proven fungemia, with Candida albicans (n=114, 43%) and Candida glabrata (n=74, 28%) being the most common fungal species in blood culture. The in-hospital mortality rate was 121 (46%). In total, 7 patients were identified as having eye- or vision-related diagnosis codes, none of whom had fungal endophthalmitis based on record review. There were 26,830 free-text narrative notes associated with these 265 patients. A regular expression pipeline based on relevant terms yielded possible matches in 683 notes from 108 patients. Subsequent manual record review again demonstrated that no patients had fungal ocular involvement. Therefore, the prevalence of fungal ocular involvement in this cohort was 0%. CONCLUSIONS:MIMIC-III contained no cases of ocular involvement among fungemic patients, consistent with prior studies reporting low rates of ocular involvement in fungemia. This study demonstrates an application of natural language processing to expedite the review of narrative notes. This approach is highly relevant for ophthalmology, where diagnoses are often based on physical examination findings that are documented within clinical notes.

SUBMITTER: Baxter SL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7455861 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Text Processing for Detection of Fungal Ocular Involvement in Critical Care Patients: Cross-Sectional Study.

Baxter Sally L SL   Klie Adam R AR   Radha Saseendrakumar Bharanidharan B   Ye Gordon Y GY   Hogarth Michael M  

Journal of medical Internet research 20200814 8


<h4>Background</h4>Fungal ocular involvement can develop in patients with fungal bloodstream infections and can be vision-threatening. Ocular involvement has become less common in the current era of improved antifungal therapies. Retrospectively determining the prevalence of fungal ocular involvement is important for informing clinical guidelines, such as the need for routine ophthalmologic consultations. However, manual retrospective record review to detect cases is time-consuming.<h4>Objective  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6565360 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8500233 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5545000 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3307438 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7595714 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8762065 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9751627 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB50407 | ENA
| S-EPMC6647098 | biostudies-literature
2014-10-15 | E-MTAB-1977 | biostudies-arrayexpress