Dataset Information

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingectomy in a Patient with Microduplication Syndrome (20p13p12.1) and a Bicornuate Uterus: An Unreported Association.

ABSTRACT: Trisomy 20p is a chromosomal anomaly resulting from whole or partial duplication of the short arm of chromosome 20. It is a rarely reported syndrome and it is estimated that there are only a few cases of this condition worldwide, which hampers the phenotypic characterization of this entity. Conversely, müllerian anomalies include a group of congenital malformations of the uterus, vagina, cervix, and fallopian tubes resulting from alterations in the embryological development of the müllerian ducts. We report a case of pure trisomy 20p diagnosed using array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) accompanied by a müllerian anomaly in a female patient with abnormal growth pattern, round face, coarse hair, broad nose, long palpebral fissure, epicanthus, and megaureter.

SUBMITTER: Pachajoa H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7457575 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingectomy in a Patient with Microduplication Syndrome (20p13p12.1) and a Bicornuate Uterus: An Unreported Association.

Pachajoa Harry H Perafan Lina L Ramos Isabella I Escobar Álvaro J ÁJ

International journal of women's health 20200825

Trisomy 20p is a chromosomal anomaly resulting from whole or partial duplication of the short arm of chromosome 20. It is a rarely reported syndrome and it is estimated that there are only a few cases of this condition worldwide, which hampers the phenotypic characterization of this entity. Conversely, müllerian anomalies include a group of congenital malformations of the uterus, vagina, cervix, and fallopian tubes resulting from alterations in the embryological development of the müllerian duct ...[more]

PMID: 32904596

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that "the surgeon and patient discuss the potential benefits of the removal of the fallopian tubes during a hysterectomy in women at population risk of ovarian cancer who are not having an oophorectomy," resulting in an increasing rate of salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy. Rates of salpingectomy are highest for laparoscopic and lowest for vaginal hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE:The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of bilateral salpingectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. Secondary objectives included identification of factors associated with unsuccessful salpingectomy and assessment of its impact on operating time, blood loss, surgical complications, and menopausal symptoms. STUDY DESIGN:This was a multicenter, prospective study of patients undergoing planned vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. Baseline medical data along with operative findings, operative time, and blood loss for salpingectomy were recorded. Uterine weight and pathology reports for all fallopian tubes were reviewed. Patients completed the Menopause Rating Scale at baseline and at postoperative follow-up. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the sample and compare those with successful and unsuccessful completion of planned salpingectomy using Student t test, and ?2 test when appropriate. Questionnaire scores were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS:Among 77 patients offered enrollment, 74 consented (96%), and complete data were available regarding primary outcome for 69 (93%). Mean age was 51 years. Median body mass index was 29.1 kg/m2; median vaginal parity was 2, and 41% were postmenopausal. The indications for hysterectomy included prolapse (78%), heavy menstrual bleeding (20%), and fibroids (11%). When excluding conversions to alternate routes, vaginal salpingectomy was successfully performed in 52/64 (81%) women. Mean operating time for bilateral salpingectomy was 11 (±5.6) minutes, with additional estimated blood loss of 6 (±16.3) mL. There were 8 surgical complications: 3 hemorrhages >500 mL and 5 conversions to alternate routes of surgery, but none of these were due to the salpingectomy. Mean uterine weight was 102 g and there were no malignancies on fallopian tube pathology. Among the 17 patients in whom planned bilateral salpingectomy was not completed, unilateral salpingectomy was performed in 7 patients. Reasons for noncompletion included: tubes high in the pelvis (8), conversion to alternate route for pathology (4), bowel or sidewall adhesions (3), tubes absent (1), and ovarian adhesions (1). Prior adnexal surgery (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-5.5; P = .006) and uterine fibroids (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-22.5; P = .02) were the only significant factors associated with unsuccessful bilateral salpingectomy. Mean menopause scores improved after successful salpingectomy (12.7 vs 8.6; P < .001). CONCLUSION:Vaginal salpingectomy is feasible in the majority of women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy and increases operating time by 11 minutes and blood loss by 6 mL. Women with prior adnexal surgery or uterine fibroids should be counseled about the possibility that removal may not be feasible.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To compare the effects of laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in the abdominal trial, and laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy in the vaginal trial. DESIGN:Two parallel, multicentre, randomised trials. SETTING:28 UK centres and two South African centres. PARTICIPANTS:1380 women were recruited; 1346 had surgery; 937 were followed up at one year. Primary outcome Rate of major complications. RESULTS:In the abdominal trial laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher rate of major complications than abdominal hysterectomy (11.1% v 6.2%, P = 0.02; difference 4.9%, 95% confidence interval 0.9% to 9.1%) and the number needed to treat to harm was 20. Laparoscopic hysterectomy also took longer to perform (84 minutes v 50 minutes) but was less painful (visual analogue scale 3.51 v 3.88, P = 0.01) and resulted in a shorter stay in hospital after the operation (3 days v 4 days). Six weeks after the operation, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with less pain and better quality of life than abdominal hysterectomy (SF-12, body image scale, and sexual activity questionnaires). In the vaginal trial we found no evidence of a difference in major complication rates between laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy (9.8% v 9.5%, P = 0.92; difference 0.3%, -5.2% to 5.8%), and the number needed to treat to harm was 333. We found no evidence of other differences between laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy except that laparoscopic hysterectomy took longer to perform (72 minutes v 39 minutes) and was associated with a higher rate of detecting unexpected pathology (16.4% v 4.8%, P = < 0.01). However, this trial was underpowered. CONCLUSIONS:Laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a significantly higher rate of major complications than abdominal hysterectomy. It also took longer to perform but was associated with less pain, quicker recovery, and better short term quality of life. The trial comparing vaginal hysterectomy with laparoscopic hysterectomy was underpowered and is inconclusive on the rate of major complications; however, vaginal hysterectomy took less time.

Dataset Information

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingectomy in a Patient with Microduplication Syndrome (20p13p12.1) and a Bicornuate Uterus: An Unreported Association.

Publications

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingectomy in a Patient with Microduplication Syndrome (20p13p12.1) and a Bicornuate Uterus: An Unreported Association.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure