Dataset Information

Surgical site infection after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in the UK.

ABSTRACT: Aims:This study explores the reported rate of surgical site infection (SSI) after hip fracture surgery in published studies concerning patients treated in the UK. Methods:Studies were included if they reported on SSI after any type of surgical treatment for hip fracture. Each study required a minimum of 30 days follow-up and 100 patients. Meta-analysis was undertaken using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was expressed using the I2 statistic. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) system. Results:There were 20 studies reporting data from 88,615 patients. Most were retrospective cohort studies from single centres. The pooled incidence was 2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54% to 2.62%) across 'all types' of hip fracture surgery. When analyzed by operation type, the SSI incidences were: hemiarthroplasty 2.87% (95% CI 1.99% to 3.75%) and sliding hip screw 1.35% (95% CI 0.78% to 1.93%). There was considerable variation in definition of infection used, as well as considerable risk of bias, particularly as few studies actively screened participants for SSI. Conclusion:Synthesis of published estimates of infection yield a rate higher than that seen in national surveillance procedures. Biases noted in all studies would trend towards an underestimate, largely due to inadequate follow-up.

SUBMITTER: Masters J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7469514 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Surgical site infection after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in the UK.

Masters James J Metcalfe David D Ha Joon Soo JS Judge Andrew A Costa Matthew L ML

Bone & joint research 20200903 9

<h4>Aims</h4>This study explores the reported rate of surgical site infection (SSI) after hip fracture surgery in published studies concerning patients treated in the UK.<h4>Methods</h4>Studies were included if they reported on SSI after any type of surgical treatment for hip fracture. Each study required a minimum of 30 days follow-up and 100 patients. Meta-analysis was undertaken using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was expressed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Risk of bias was asses ...[more]

PMID: 32922764

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionSurgical site infection occurs within 30?days after a surgical procedure and involves the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and soft tissue. Surgical site infection following cesarean section is a common postoperative complication and is associated with maternal morbidity and mortality in resource-limited settings. Even though the proportion of surgical site infection and some risk factors were reported by kinds of literature, varying results were stated across studies. There is also limited knowledge on the association between postpartum surgical site infection and the rupture of membrane. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to estimate the pooled proportion of surgical site infection and its association with rupture of membrane following cesarean section in Africa.MethodsStudies published from January 01, 2000 to January 30, 2020 were searched from MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Medscape, Web-science and CINAHL databases to search relevant published articles. We also performed a manual search of reference lists of key articles to retrieve additional relevant articles. Initially, 559 records were identified and 15 studies included in the analysis. The statistical analysis was performed using STATA 11. Heterogeneity between-study was explored by forest plot and inconsistency index (I2). The publication bias was checked by a funnel plot and Egger's test. Pooled estimates of proportion and odds ratio were calculated by a random-effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsThe overall pooled proportion of surgical site infection following cesarean section was 10.21% (I2?=?86.8, p?<?0.000; 95% CI?=?8.36, 12.06). The odds of developing surgical site infection among women who had the rupture of membrane before delivery were nearly 6 times higher than those who had not a rupture of the membrane (AOR?=?5.65, 95% CI: 3.95-8.07).ConclusionsThe proportion of surgical site infections following the cesarean section is relatively high. Women who had rupture of the membrane before delivery were more likely to develop surgical site infections following the cesarean section. Due attention should be given to the provision of prophylactic antibiotics that can reduce surgical site infection after cesarean delivery.

Project description:BackgroundEarly mobilisation leads to a two-fold increase in the adjusted odds of discharge by 30-days compared to late mobilisation. Whether this association varies by patient characteristics identified as reasons for delayed mobilisation is unknown.MethodsAudit data was linked to hospitalisation records for 133,319 patients 60 years or older surgically treated for hip fracture in England or Wales between 2014 and 2016. Adjusted proportional odds regression models tested whether the cumulative incidences of discharge differed between those mobilised early and those mobilised late for subgroups defined by dementia, delirium, hypotension, prefracture ambulation, and prefracture residence, accounting for the competing risk of death.ResultsOverall, 34,253 patients presented with dementia, 9818 with delirium, and 10,123 with hypotension. Prefracture, 100,983 were ambulant outdoors, 30,834 were ambulant indoors only, 107,144 were admitted from home, and 23,588 from residential care. 1502 had incomplete data for ambulation and 2587 for prefracture residence. 10, 8, 8, 12, and 12% fewer patients with dementia, delirium, hypotension, ambulant indoors only prefracture, or admitted from residential care mobilised early when compared to those who presented without dementia, delirium, hypotension, with outdoor ambulation prefracture, or admitted from home. The adjusted odds ratios of discharge by 30-days postoperatively among those who mobilised early compared with those who mobilised late were 1.71 (95% CI 1.62-1.81) for those with dementia, 2.06 (95% CI 1.98-2.15) without dementia, 1.56 (95% CI 1.41-1.73) with delirium, 2.00 (95% CI 1.93-2.07) without delirium, 1.83 (95% CI, 1.66-2.02) with hypotension, 1.95 (95% CI, 1.89-2.02) without hypotension, 2.00 (95% CI 1.92-2.08) with outdoor ambulation prefracture, 1.80 (95% CI 1.70-1.91) with indoor ambulation only prefracture, 2.30 (95% CI 2.19-2.41) admitted from home, and 1.64 (95% CI 1.51-1.77) admitted from residential care, accounting for the competing risk of death.ConclusionIrrespective of dementia, delirium, hypotension, prefracture ambulation or residence, early compared to late mobilisation increased the likelihood of hospital discharge by 30-days postoperatively. However, fewer patients with dementia, delirium, or hypotension, poorer prefracture ambulation, or from residential care mobilised early. There is a need reduce this care gap by ensuring sufficient resource to enable all patients to benefit from early mobilisation.

Dataset Information

Surgical site infection after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in the UK.

Publications

Surgical site infection after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in the UK.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets