Dataset Information

The impact of insurance status on the survival outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The impact of insurance status on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patient survival is unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of insurance status on the survival outcomes of RCC patients in the United States of America.

Methods

Data of patients diagnosed with RCC between 2007 and 2014 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, a large national database including statistics on cancer patients. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the influence of insurance status on cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 30,951 eligible RCC patients were identified. Of these patients, 25,493 (82.37%) were insured, 3,959 (12.79%) had any Medicaid coverage, and 1,499 (4.84%) were uninsured. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that insurance status was associated with better CCS (P<0.001). The 5-year CSS rates of patients with insurance, any Medicaid, and no insurance were 88.3%, 82.6%, and 82.7%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients with any Medicaid had poorer CSS than insured patients [hazard ratio (HR), 1.222; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.100-1.357]. Stratified analysis revealed that at localized tumor stage and at regional tumor stage or among white patients, any Medicaid insurance was an independent predictor of an unfavorable survival outcome.

Conclusions

Among the RCC patients in this study, individuals with insurance experienced improved CSS while individuals with any Medicaid tended to suffer worse survival outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Li Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7475676 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The impact of insurance status on the survival outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Li Yan Y Zhu Ming-Xi MX Zhang Bing B

Translational andrology and urology 20200801 4

<h4>Background</h4>The impact of insurance status on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patient survival is unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of insurance status on the survival outcomes of RCC patients in the United States of America.<h4>Methods</h4>Data of patients diagnosed with RCC between 2007 and 2014 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, a large national database including statistics on cancer patients. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox ...[more]

PMID: 32944529

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLow socioeconomic status (SES) has been linked to worse survival in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the impact of SES on early-onset CRC remains undescribed.Materials and methodsRetrospective analysis of data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2016 was conducted. We combined income and education to form a composite measure of SES. Logistic regression and χ2 testing were used to examine early-onset CRC according to SES group. Survival rates and Cox proportional hazards models compared stage-specific overall survival (OS) between the SES groups.ResultsIn total, 30,903 patients with early-onset CRC were identified, of whom 78.7% were White; 14.5% were Black. Low SES compared with high SES patients were more likely to be Black (26.3% vs. 6.1%) or Hispanic (25.3% vs. 10.5%), have T4 tumors (21.3% vs. 17.8%) and/or N2 disease (13% vs. 11.1%), and present with stage IV disease (32.8% vs. 27.7%) at diagnosis (p < .0001, all comparisons). OS gradually improved with increasing SES at all disease stages (p < .001). In stage IV, the 5-year survival rate was 13.9% vs. 21.7% for patients with low compared with high SES. In multivariable analysis, SES (low vs. high group; adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj ], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.46) was found to have a significant effect on survival (p < .0001) when all of the confounding variables were adjusted. Insurance (not private vs. private; HRadj , 1.38; 95% CI, 1.31-1.44) mediates 31% of the SES effect on survival.ConclusionPatients with early-onset CRC with low SES had the worst outcomes. Our data suggest that SES should be considered when implementing programs to improve the early detection and treatment of patients with early-onset CRC.Implications for practiceLow socioeconomic status (SES) has been linked to worse survival in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the impact of SES on early-onset CRC remains undescribed. In this retrospective study of 30,903 patients with early-onset CRC in the National Cancer Database, a steady increase in the yearly rate of stage IV diagnosis at presentation was observed. The risk of death increased as socioeconomic status decreased. Race and insurance status were independent predictors for survival. Implementation of programs to improve access to care and early diagnostic strategies among younger adults, especially those with low SES, is warranted.

Dataset Information

The impact of insurance status on the survival outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The impact of insurance status on the survival outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets