Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The Sandwich principle: assessing the didactic effect in lectures on "cleft lips and palates".


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:A teaching concept, that takes individual learning and personal belongings into account, is called the "sandwich principle." This didactic method is an educational concept that alternates consecutively between individual and collective learning phases during a course. This study aimed to prove whether the application of the sandwich principle in lectures increases the learning outcome compared with classical lectures. METHODS:All participants (n?=?64) were randomly allocated into two groups. One group attended a classical face-to-face lecture and the other attended a lecture that was modified according to the sandwich principle, including activating elements. To compare knowledge gain after the lectures, all the participants had to answer a test comprising40 single-choice questions. In addition, the lectures were evaluated. RESULTS:Students attending the sandwich lecture had significantly better scores in the test than those who attending the classical lecture (p?

SUBMITTER: Bock A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7493973 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The Sandwich principle: assessing the didactic effect in lectures on "cleft lips and palates".

Bock Anna A   Idzko-Siekermann Bianca B   Lemos Martin M   Kniha Kristian K   Möhlhenrich Stephan Christian SC   Peters Florian F   Hölzle Frank F   Modabber Ali A  

BMC medical education 20200915 1


<h4>Background</h4>A teaching concept, that takes individual learning and personal belongings into account, is called the "sandwich principle." This didactic method is an educational concept that alternates consecutively between individual and collective learning phases during a course. This study aimed to prove whether the application of the sandwich principle in lectures increases the learning outcome compared with classical lectures.<h4>Methods</h4>All participants (n = 64) were randomly allo  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4549757 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5675451 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3198142 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10597411 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8501714 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4731506 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7149324 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5099249 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8699834 | biostudies-literature
2008-06-01 | GSE11400 | GEO