Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Graft patency at 3 months after off- and on-pump coronary bypass surgery: a randomized trial.


ABSTRACT: Purpose:Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed either with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) or without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump). There is a scarcity of angiographic data to support the non-inferiority of off-pump technique to on-pump technique. The objective of this study is to ascertain the non-inferiority of off-pump CABG when compared to on-pump CABG in terms of angiographically assessed graft patency at 3 months. Methods:A total of 320 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were enrolled in a multicenter prospective randomized trial either to on-pump CABG (n?=?162) or off-pump CABG (n?=?158) between March 2016 through March 2017. Graft patency was evaluated by using either multidetector computerized tomographic angiography or conventional coronary angiography at 3 months. The major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACCE) were also analyzed at 3 months. Results:The median number of grafts per patient in off-pump was 3.00 (Q1:3.00 and Q3:4.00) vs on-pump 4.00 (Q1:3.00 to Q3:4.00), and the mean number of grafts per patient was lower in the off-pump CABG at 3.45?±?0.75 vs 3.64?±?0.70 in the on-pump CABG (p?=?0.01). There was no significant difference in mortality at 3 months between the off-pump (0.63%) and on-pump groups (1.85%) with p value of 0.62. The cumulative combined MACCE showed significant difference between off-pump group (0.63%) and on-pump group (5.55%), p?=?0.01. Follow-up angiograms were done in 239 (75%) patients with 120 off-pump and 119 in the on-pump group. The analysis was also done regarding graft patency in a graded manner-when analysis of A (excellent) grafts vs B (stenosed) grafts and O (occluded) grafts were made, there was no statistically significant difference in overall graft patency at 3 months between on-pump [376 /429 grafts (87.6%)] and off-pump [366 /420 grafts (87.1%)] groups (p?=?0.82). The patency rates were similar among bypass conduits (left internal thoracic artery (ITA) in off-pump (91.4%) vs on-pump (92.9%) p?=?0.66, right ITA in off-pump (82.1%) vs on-pump (81.8%) p?=?0.97, radial artery in off-pump (84.4%) vs on-pump (82.6%) p?=?0.81; saphenous vein in off-pump (85.8%) vs on-pump (86.3%), p?=?0.86 and among 3 coronary territories. Conclusions:Off-pump CABG is non-inferior to on-pump CABG in terms of overall graft patency at 3 months and was associated with a fewer combined cumulative MACCE compared to on-pump CABG.

SUBMITTER: Sajja LR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7525555 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Graft patency at 3 months after off- and on-pump coronary bypass surgery: a randomized trial.

Sajja Lokeswara Rao LR   Sarkar Kunal K   Mannam Gopichand G   Kodali Venkata Krishna Kumar VKK   Padmanabhan Chandrasekar C   Peter Sanjeeth S   Mulay Anvay A   Beri Prashanthi P  

Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 20191028 2


<h4>Purpose</h4>Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed either with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) or without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump). There is a scarcity of angiographic data to support the non-inferiority of off-pump technique to on-pump technique. The objective of this study is to ascertain the non-inferiority of off-pump CABG when compared to on-pump CABG in terms of angiographically assessed graft patency at 3 months.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 320 patients  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2012-10-12 | E-GEOD-29396 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-10-12 | GSE29396 | GEO
| S-EPMC4332522 | biostudies-literature
2010-06-22 | GSE12504 | GEO
2010-07-07 | E-GEOD-12504 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC6739783 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7560239 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5732376 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4711702 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1767341 | biostudies-literature