Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:As an emerging technology, robot-assisted surgical system has some potential merits in many complicated endoscopic procedures compared with laparoscopic surgery. But robot-assisted liver resection is still a controversial problem on its advantages compared with laparoscopic liver resection. We aimed to perform the meta-analysis to assess and compare the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. METHODS:We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase databases, Clinicaltrials, and Opengrey through March 24, 2020, including references of qualifying articles. English-language, original investigations in humans about robot-assisted and laparoscopic hepatectomy were included. Titles, abstracts, and articles were reviewed by at least 2 independent readers. Continuous and dichotomous variables were compared by the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR), respectively. RESULTS:Of 936 titles identified in our original search, 28 articles met our criteria, involving 3544 patients. Compared with laparoscopy, the robot-assisted groups had longer operative time (WMD: 36.93; 95% CI, 19.74-54.12; P < 0.001), lower conversion rate (OR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87; P = 0.005), higher transfusion rate (WMD: 2.39; 95% CI, 1.51-3.76; P < 0.001) and higher total cost (WMD:0.49; 95% CI, 0.42-0.55; P < 0.001). In addition, the baseline characteristics of patients about largest tumor size was larger (WMD: 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.56; P < 0.001) and malignant lesions rate was higher (WMD: 1.50; 95% CI, 1.21-1.86; P < 0.001) in the robot-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy. The subgroup analysis of minor hepatectomy showed robot-assisted was associated with longer operative time (WMD: 36.00; 95% CI, 12.59-59.41; P = 0.003), longer length of stay (WMD: 0.51; 95% CI, 0.02-1.01; p = 0.04) and higher total cost (WMD: 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.72; P < 0.001) (Table 3); while the subgroup analysis of major hepatectomy showed robot-assisted was associated with lower estimated blood loss (WMD: -122.43; 95% CI, -151.78--93.08; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Our meta-analysis revealed that robot-assisted was associated with longer operative time, lower conversion rate, higher transfusion rate and total cost, and robot-assisted has certain advantages in major hepatectomy compared with laparoscopic hepatectomy.

SUBMITTER: Zhang L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7553328 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.

Zhang Lilong L   Yuan Qihang Q   Xu Yao Y   Wang Weixing W  

PloS one 20201013 10


<h4>Background</h4>As an emerging technology, robot-assisted surgical system has some potential merits in many complicated endoscopic procedures compared with laparoscopic surgery. But robot-assisted liver resection is still a controversial problem on its advantages compared with laparoscopic liver resection. We aimed to perform the meta-analysis to assess and compare the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Em  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7746565 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5356680 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4814602 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10540847 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5779699 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6833163 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6386178 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10235152 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10794378 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7125366 | biostudies-literature