Dataset Information

Contributions to prematurity of maternal health conditions, subfertility, and assisted reproductive technology.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine the maternal demographic, health, and fertility variables underlying prematurity.

Design

Retrospective: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data linked to Massachusetts birth certificates and hospital stays.

Setting

Not applicable.

Patients

We included 166,963 privately insured, singleton, first births to women ≥18 years of age between 2004 and 2013. Deliveries were as follows: assisted reproductive technology (ART) when linked to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, medically assisted reproduction (MAR) when fertility treatment was indicated on the birth certificate, unassisted subfertile (USF) when there were indications of subfertility but no treatment, and fertile if none of the above.

Intervention

None.

Main outcome measures

Late preterm birth (LPTB; 34-36 weeks) and early preterm birth (EPTB; <34 weeks) were compared with term deliveries (≥37 weeks). Covariates that statistically significantly influenced prematurity in binary analysis were modeled by using multinomial logistic regression. Backward elimination and mediation analysis were used to determine the influence of single parameters on outcomes of others.

Results

LPTB was increased in the USF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.65) and ART (AOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.56) but not MAR (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.98-1.37). ETPB was increased in all (USF: AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.21-2.31; MAR: AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.12; ART: AOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21-1.61). The strongest effectors of prematurity were placental problems (LPTB: AOR 4.02; EPTB: AOR 10.28), pregnancy hypertension (LPTB: AOR 2.14; EPTB: AOR 2.88), and chronic hypertension (LPTB: AOR 1.85; EPTB: AOR 2.79). Mediation analysis demonstrated a statistically significant indirect effect of placental problems for ART and subfertility.

Conclusion

The greatest effectors of prematurity were placental problems and hypertensive disorders. ART and, to a lesser extent, subfertility were both associated with preterm birth directly and indirectly mediated by placenta problems.

SUBMITTER: Stern JE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7554177 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare incidence, risk factors, and etiology of women's deaths in fertile, subfertile, and undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the years after delivery.DesignRetrospective cohort.SettingUniversity hospital.Patient(s)Women who had delivered in Massachusetts.Intervention(s)This study used data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System linked to vital records, hospital stays, and the Massachusetts death file. Mortality of patients delivered from 2004-2013 was evaluated through 2015. The exposure groups, determined on the basis of the last delivery, were ART-treated (linked to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System), subfertile (no ART but with indicators of subfertility including birth certificate checkbox for fertility treatment, prior hospitalization for infertility [International Classification of Disease codes 9 628 or V23], and/or prior delivery with checkbox or ART), or fertile (neither ART nor subfertile). Numbers (per 100,000 women-years) and causes of death were obtained from the Massachusetts death file.Main outcome measure(s)Mortality of women after delivery in each of the three fertility groups and the most common etiology of death in each.Result(s)We included 483,547 women: 16,429 ART, 11,696 subfertile, and 455,422 fertile among whom there were 1,280 deaths with 21.1, 25.5, and 44.7 deaths, respectively, per 100,000 women-years. External causes (violence, accidents, and poisonings) were the most common reasons for death in the fertile group. Deaths occurred on average 46 months after delivery. When external causes of death were removed, there were 19.1, 17.0, and 25.6 deaths per 100,000 women-years and leading causes of death in all groups were cancer and circulatory problems.Conclusion(s)The study presents reassuring data that death rates within 5 years of delivery in ART-treated and subfertile women do not differ from those in fertile women.

Project description:ImportanceNumerous studies have documented the association of self-rated health (SRH) with chronic diseases. However, few studies have investigated its association with semen quality.ObjectiveTo examine the association of SRH with semen quality among men undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) in China.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study recruited male partners in couples undergoing ART treatment at the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China. A total of 1262 men underwent 2 semen examinations and completed a questionnaire on SRH between December 2018 and January 2020. Data analysis was performed from November 20, 2022, to March 24, 2023.ExposureSRH, including overall physical and mental health, as well as reproductive-related physical and mental health specifically, were reported at baseline recruitment.Main outcomes and measuresSperm concentration, sperm progressive motility, sperm motility, and sperm count as semen quality parameters.ResultsThe study included 1262 men with a mean (SD) age of 32.79 (5.25) years and body mass index of 24.37 (3.68). Men with poorer SRH had lower semen quality (eg, sperm concentration among poor vs very good overall physical health: percentage variation, -14.67%; 95% CI, -23.62% to -4.66%). Among 4 components of SRH, a greater reduction in semen quality was estimated for reproductive-related SRH compared with overall SRH, whereas the greatest reduction was observed for reproductive-related physical SRH. In comparison with men with very good reproductive-related physical SRH, men with poor reproductive-related physical SRH had differences of -24.78% (95% CI, -32.71% to -15.93%) and -25.61% (95% CI, -33.95% to -16.22%) in sperm count and concentration, respectively, and regression coefficients of -9.38 (95% CI, -12.01 to -6.76) and -9.24 (95% CI, -11.82 to -6.66) for sperm motility and sperm progressive motility, respectively.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cross-sectional study of Chinese men, poorer SRH was associated with lower semen quality, and reproductive-related physical SRH was the most pronounced indicator. Our findings suggest that SRH, especially reproductive-related physical SRH, was a good indicator of semen quality, which should inform public and clinical regulatory decisions.