Dataset Information

FSRT vs. SRS in Brain Metastases-Differences in Local Control and Radiation Necrosis-A Volumetric Study.

ABSTRACT: Background: While the role of stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases is increasing, evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and single-session radiosurgery (SRS) is scarce. Methods: Longitudinal volumetric analysis was performed in a consecutive cohort of 120 patients and 190 brain metastases (>0.065 cm3 in volume / > ~5 mm in diameter) treated exclusively with FSRT (n = 98) and SRS (n = 92), respectively. A total of 972 tumor segmentations was used, averaging 5.1 time points per metastasis. Progression was defined using a volumetric extension of the RANO-BM criteria. Local control and radionecrosis were compared for lesions treated with FSRT and SRS, respectively. Results: Metastases treated with FSRT were significantly larger at baseline (mean, 4.66 vs. 0.40 cm3, p < 0.001). Biologically effective dose (BED) for metastases (?/? = 12, linear-quadratic-cubic model) was significantly associated with local control, whereas BED for normal brain (?/? = 2, linear-quadratic model) was significantly associated with radionecrosis. Median time to local progression was 22.9 months in the FSRT group compared to 14.5 months in the SRS group (p = 0.022). Overall radionecrosis rate at 12 months was 3.4% for FSRT and 14.8% for SRS (p = 0.010). Radionecrosis °IV requiring resection with histologic proof of radiation necrosis also was significantly reduced in the FSRT group (FSRT 0.0% vs. SRS 3.9%, p = 0.041). In multivariate analysis, FSRT was associated with reduced risk of progression (HR 0.47, p = 0.015) and reduced risk of radionecrosis (HR 0.18, p = 0.045). Conclusions: This volumetric study provides initial evidence that the improvements in therapeutic ratio expected for FSRT in larger brain metastases, might equally extend into the domain of smaller metastases, traditionally less considered for fractionated treatment. FSRT might constitute an important tool to further increase local control and reduce radionecrosis risk in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases, that should be assessed in randomized intervention trials.

SUBMITTER: Putz F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7554610 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

FSRT vs. SRS in Brain Metastases-Differences in Local Control and Radiation Necrosis-A Volumetric Study.

Putz Florian F Weissmann Thomas T Oft Dominik D Schmidt Manuel Alexander MA Roesch Johannes J Siavooshhaghighi Hadi H Filimonova Irina I Schmitter Charlotte C Mengling Veit V Bert Christoph C Frey Benjamin B Lettmaier Sebastian S Distel Luitpold Valentin LV Semrau Sabine S Fietkau Rainer R

Frontiers in oncology 20200930

Background: While the role of stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases is increasing, evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and single-session radiosurgery (SRS) is scarce. Methods: Longitudinal volumetric analysis was performed in a consecutive cohort of 120 patients and 190 brain metastases (>0.065 cm3 in volume / > ~5 mm in diameter) treated exclusively with FSRT (n = 98) and SRS (n = 92), ...[more]

PMID: 33102223

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeStereotactic radiosurgery/radiation therapy (SRS/SRT) increasingly has been used to treat brain metastases. However, the development of distant brain metastases (DBMs) in the untreated brain remains a serious complication. We sought to develop a spatially aware radiomic signature to model the time-to-DBM development in a cohort of patients leveraging pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiation therapy treatment planning data including radiation dose distribution maps.Methods and materialsWe retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 105 patients with brain metastases treated by SRS/SRT with pretreatment multiparametric MRI (T1, T1 postcontrast, T2, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery). Three-dimensional radiomic features were extracted from each MRI sequence within 5 isodose regions of interest (ROIs) identified via radiation dose distribution maps and gross target volume (GTV) contours. Clinical features including patient performance status, number of lesions treated, tumor volume, and tumor stage were collected to serve as a baseline for comparison. Cox proportional hazards (CPH) modeling and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to model time-to-DBM development.ResultsCPH models trained using radiomic features achieved a mean concordance index (c-index) of 0.63 (standard deviation [SD], 0.08) compared with a c-index of 0.49 (SD, 0.09) for CPH models trained using clinical factors. A CPH model trained using both radiomic and clinical features achieved a c-index of 0.69 (SD, 0.08). The identified radiomic signature was able to stratify patients into distinct risk groups with statistically significant differences (P = .00007) in time-to-DBM development as measured by log-rank test. Clinical features were unable to do the same. Radiomic features from the peritumoral 50% to 75% isodose ROI and GTV region were most predictive of DBM development.ConclusionsOur results suggest that radiomic features extracted from pretreatment MRI and multiple isodose ROIs can model time-to-DBM development in patients receiving SRS/SRT for brain metastases, outperforming clinical feature baselines. Notably, we believe we are the first to leverage SRS/SRT dose maps for ROI identification and subsequent radiomic analysis of peritumoral and untargeted brain regions using multiparametric MRI. We observed that the peritumoral environment may be implicated in DBM development for SRS/SRT-treated brain metastases. Our preliminary results might enable the identification of patients with predisposition to DBM development and prompt subsequent changes in disease management.

Project description:ImportanceBrain metastases are a common source of morbidity for patients with cancer, and limited data exist to support the local therapeutic choice between surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).ObjectiveTo evaluate local control of brain metastases among patients treated with SRS vs surgical resection within the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22952-26001 phase 3 trial.Design, setting, and participantsThis unplanned, exploratory analysis of the international, multi-institutional randomized clinical trial EORTC 22952-26001 (conducted from 1996-2007) was performed from February 9, 2017, through July 25, 2018. The EORTC 22952-26001 trial randomized patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases to whole-brain radiotherapy vs observation after complete surgical resection or before SRS. Patients in the present analysis were stratified but not randomized according to local modality (SRS or surgical resection) and treated per protocol with 1 to 2 brain metastases and tumors with a diameter of no greater than 4 cm.InterventionsSurgical resection or SRS.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was local recurrence of treated lesions. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence was calculated according to modality (surgical resection vs SRS) with competing risk regression to adjust for prognostic factors and competing risk of death.ResultsA total of 268 patients were included in the analysis (66.4% men; median age, 60.7 years [range, 26.9-81.1 years]); 154 (57.5%) underwent SRS and 114 (42.5%) underwent surgical resection. Median follow-up time was 39.9 months (range, 26.0-1982.0 months). Compared with the SRS group, patients undergoing surgical resection had larger metastases (median 28 mm [range, 10-40 mm] vs 20 mm [range, 4-40 mm]; P < .001), more frequently had 1 brain metastasis (112 [98.2%] vs 114 [74.0%]; P < .001), and differed in location (parietal, 21 [18.4%] vs 61 [39.6%]; posterior fossa, 30 [26.3%] vs 12 [7.8%]; P < .001). In adjusted models, local recurrence was similar between the SRS and surgical resection groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.72-1.83). However, when stratified by interval, patients with surgical resection had a much higher risk of early (0-3 months) local recurrence compared with those undergoing SRS (HR, 5.94; 95% CI, 1.72-20.45), but their risk decreased with time (HR for 3-6 months, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.64-2.90]; HR for 6-9 months, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.28-2.00]). At 9 months or longer, the surgical resection group had a lower risk of local recurrence (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.93).Conclusions and relevanceIn this exploratory analysis, local control of brain metastases was similar between SRS and surgical resection groups. Stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with improved early local control of treated lesions compared with surgical resection, although the relative benefit decreased with time.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002899.

Dataset Information

FSRT vs. SRS in Brain Metastases-Differences in Local Control and Radiation Necrosis-A Volumetric Study.

Publications

FSRT vs. SRS in Brain Metastases-Differences in Local Control and Radiation Necrosis-A Volumetric Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets