Dataset Information

The influence of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on hospital length of stay and survival in people with COVID-19.

ABSTRACT: Objective:During the COVID-19 pandemic the continuation or cessation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has been contentious. Mechanisms have been proposed for both beneficial and detrimental effects. Recent studies have focused on mortality with no literature having examined length of hospital stay. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of ACEi and ARBs on COVID-19 mortality and length of hospital stay. Methods:COPE (COVID-19 in Older People) is a multicenter observational study including adults of all ages admitted with either laboratory or clinically confirmed COVID-19. Routinely generated hospital data were collected. Primary outcome: mortality; secondary outcomes: Day-7 mortality and length of hospital stay. A mixed-effects multivariable Cox's proportional baseline hazards model and logistic equivalent were used. Results:1371 patients were included from eleven centres between 27th February to 25th April 2020. Median age was 74 years [IQR 61-83]. 28.6% of patients were taking an ACEi or ARB. There was no effect of ACEi or ARB on inpatient mortality (aHR = 0.85, 95%CI 0.65-1.11). For those prescribed an ACEi or ARB, hospital stay was significantly reduced (aHR = 1.25, 95%CI 1.02-1.54, p = 0.03) and in those with hypertension the effect was stronger (aHR = 1.39, 95%CI 1.09-1.77, p = 0.007). Conclusions:Patients and clinicians can be reassured that prescription of an ACEi or ARB at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis is not harmful. The benefit of prescription of an ACEi or ARB in reducing hospital stay is a new finding.

SUBMITTER: Braude P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7561344 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The influence of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on hospital length of stay and survival in people with COVID-19.

Braude Philip P Carter Ben B Short Roxanna R Vilches-Moraga Arturo A Verduri Alessia A Pearce Lyndsay L Price Angeline A Quinn Terence J TJ Stechman Michael M Collins Jemima J Bruce Eilidh E Einarsson Alice A Rickard Frances F Mitchell Emma E Holloway Mark M Hesford James J Barlow-Pay Fenella F Clini Enrico E Myint Phyo Kyaw PK Moug Susan S McCarthy Kathryn K Hewitt Jonathan J

International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature 20201015

<h4>Objective</h4>During the COVID-19 pandemic the continuation or cessation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has been contentious. Mechanisms have been proposed for both beneficial and detrimental effects. Recent studies have focused on mortality with no literature having examined length of hospital stay. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of ACEi and ARBs on COVID-19 mortality and length of hospital stay.<h4>Methods</ ...[more]

PMID: 33083516

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceRandomized clinical trials have yielded conflicting results about the effects of remdesivir therapy on survival and length of hospital stay among people with COVID-19.ObjectiveTo examine associations between remdesivir treatment and survival and length of hospital stay among people hospitalized with COVID-19 in routine care settings.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to identify adult patients in 123 VHA hospitals who had a first hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from May 1 to October 8, 2020. Propensity score matching of patients initiating remdesivir treatment to control patients who had not initiated remdesivir treatment by the same hospital day was used to create the analytic cohort.ExposuresRemdesivir treatment.Main outcomes and measuresTime to death within 30 days of remdesivir treatment initiation (or corresponding hospital day for matched control individuals) and time to hospital discharge with time to death as a competing event. Associations between remdesivir treatment and these outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression in the matched cohort.ResultsThe initial cohort included 5898 patients admitted to 123 hospitals, 2374 (40.3%) of whom received remdesivir treatment (2238 men [94.3%]; mean [SD] age, 67.8 [12.8] years) and 3524 (59.7%) of whom never received remdesivir treatment (3302 men [93.7%]; mean [SD] age, 67.0 [14.4] years). After propensity score matching, the analysis included 1172 remdesivir recipients and 1172 controls, for a final matched cohort of 2344 individuals. Remdesivir recipients and matched controls were similar with regard to age (mean [SD], 66.6 [14.2] years vs 67.5 [14.1] years), sex (1101 men [93.9%] vs 1101 men [93.9%]), dexamethasone use (559 [47.7%] vs 559 [47.7%]), admission to the intensive care unit (242 [20.7%] vs 234 [19.1%]), and mechanical ventilation use (69 [5.9%] vs 45 [3.8%]). Standardized differences were less than 10% for all measures. Remdesivir treatment was not associated with 30-day mortality (143 remdesivir recipients [12.2%] vs 124 controls [10.6%]; log rank P = .26; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.83-1.36). Results were similar for people receiving vs not receiving dexamethasone at remdesivir initiation (dexamethasone recipients: adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35; nonrecipients: adjusted HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.84-1.69). Remdesivir recipients had a longer median time to hospital discharge compared with matched controls (6 days [interquartile range, 4-12 days] vs 3 days [interquartile range, 1-7 days]; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir treatment was not associated with improved survival but was associated with longer hospital stays. Routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds while not being associated with improvements in survival.

Project description:BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented strain on health systems, with rapidly increasing demand for healthcare in hospitals and intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. As the pandemic escalates, determining the resulting needs for healthcare resources (beds, staff, equipment) has become a key priority for many countries. Projecting future demand requires estimates of how long patients with COVID-19 need different levels of hospital care.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of early evidence on length of stay (LoS) of patients with COVID-19 in hospital and in ICU. We subsequently developed a method to generate LoS distributions which combines summary statistics reported in multiple studies, accounting for differences in sample sizes. Applying this approach, we provide distributions for total hospital and ICU LoS from studies in China and elsewhere, for use by the community.ResultsWe identified 52 studies, the majority from China (46/52). Median hospital LoS ranged from 4 to 53 days within China, and 4 to 21 days outside of China, across 45 studies. ICU LoS was reported by eight studies-four each within and outside China-with median values ranging from 6 to 12 and 4 to 19 days, respectively. Our summary distributions have a median hospital LoS of 14 (IQR 10-19) days for China, compared with 5 (IQR 3-9) days outside of China. For ICU, the summary distributions are more similar (median (IQR) of 8 (5-13) days for China and 7 (4-11) days outside of China). There was a visible difference by discharge status, with patients who were discharged alive having longer LoS than those who died during their admission, but no trend associated with study date.ConclusionPatients with COVID-19 in China appeared to remain in hospital for longer than elsewhere. This may be explained by differences in criteria for admission and discharge between countries, and different timing within the pandemic. In the absence of local data, the combined summary LoS distributions provided here can be used to model bed demands for contingency planning and then updated, with the novel method presented here, as more studies with aggregated statistics emerge outside China.

Project description:BackgroundPredicting hospital length of stay (LoS) for patients with COVID-19 infection is essential to ensure that adequate bed capacity can be provided without unnecessarily restricting care for patients with other conditions. Here, we demonstrate the utility of three complementary methods for predicting LoS using UK national- and hospital-level data.MethodOn a national scale, relevant patients were identified from the COVID-19 Hospitalisation in England Surveillance System (CHESS) reports. An Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) survival model and a truncation corrected method (TC), both with underlying Weibull distributions, were fitted to the data to estimate LoS from hospital admission date to an outcome (death or discharge) and from hospital admission date to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission date. In a second approach we fit a multi-state (MS) survival model to data directly from the Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT). We develop a planning tool that uses LoS estimates from these models to predict bed occupancy.ResultsAll methods produced similar overall estimates of LoS for overall hospital stay, given a patient is not admitted to ICU (8.4, 9.1 and 8.0 days for AFT, TC and MS, respectively). Estimates differ more significantly between the local and national level when considering ICU. National estimates for ICU LoS from AFT and TC were 12.4 and 13.4 days, whereas in local data the MS method produced estimates of 18.9 days.ConclusionsGiven the complexity and partiality of different data sources and the rapidly evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is most appropriate to use multiple analysis methods on multiple datasets. The AFT method accounts for censored cases, but does not allow for simultaneous consideration of different outcomes. The TC method does not include censored cases, instead correcting for truncation in the data, but does consider these different outcomes. The MS method can model complex pathways to different outcomes whilst accounting for censoring, but cannot handle non-random case missingness. Overall, we conclude that data-driven modelling approaches of LoS using these methods is useful in epidemic planning and management, and should be considered for widespread adoption throughout healthcare systems internationally where similar data resources exist.

Project description:BackgroundIncreasing national expenditures and use associated with TKA have resulted in pressure to reduce costs through various reimbursement cuts. However, within the arthroplasty literature, few studies have examined the association of medical comorbidities on resource use and length of stay after joint arthroplasty.Questions/purposesThe purpose of this study was to examine the association between individual patient characteristics (including demographic factors and medical comorbidities) on resource allocation and length of stay (LOS) after TKA.MethodsWe queried the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset for International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision code, 81.54, for TKAs. An initial 621,029-patient cohort was narrowed to 516,745 after inclusion of elective TKAs on patients aged between 40 and 95 years. Using generalized linear models, we estimated the effect of comorbidities on resource use (using cost-to-charge conversions to estimate hospital costs) and the LOS controlling for patient and hospital characteristics. Across the 2009 national cohort with TKAs, 12.7% had no comorbidities, whereas 32.6% had three or more. The most common conditions included hypertension (67.8%), diabetes (20.0%), and obesity (19.8%). Mean hospital costs were USD 14,491 (95% confidence interval [CI], 14,455-14,525) and mean hospital LOS was 3.3 days (95% CI, 3.29-3.31) in this data set.ResultsPatients with multiple comorbidities were associated with increased resource use and LOS. Higher marginal costs and LOS were associated with patients who had an inpatient death (USD +8017 [95% CI, 8006-8028], +2.3 [CI, 2.15-2.44] days over baseline), patients with recent weight loss (USD +4587 [95% CI, 4581-4593], +1.5 [CI, 1.45-1.61) days], minority race (USD +1037 [95% CI, 1035-1038], +0.3 [CI, 0.28-0.33] days), pulmonary-circulatory disorders (USD +3218 [95% CI, 3214-3221], +1.3 [CI, 1.25-1.34] days), and electrolyte disturbances (USD +1313 [95% CI, 1312-1314], +0.6 [CI, 0.57-0.60] days). All p values were < 0.001.ConclusionMultiple patient comorbidities were associated with additive resource use and LOS after TKA. Current reimbursement may not adequately account for these patient characteristics. To avoid potential loss of access to care for sicker patients, payment needs to be adjusted to reflect actual resource use.Level of evidenceLevel IV, economic and decision analysis. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dataset Information

The influence of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on hospital length of stay and survival in people with COVID-19.

Publications

The influence of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on hospital length of stay and survival in people with COVID-19.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets