Dataset Information

Partial Least-Squares Discriminant Analysis and Ensemble-Based Flexible Docking of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Pilot Study.

ABSTRACT: Although mAbs targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have achieved remarkable therapeutic potential against multiple types of cancer, it is still of great interest for researchers to develop small-molecule PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors without the mAb-related disadvantages of no oral bioavailability and poor solid tumor penetration. However, targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway with small molecules is normally considered challenging because of the flat and large interaction surface of the PD-1/PD-L1 complex. In this paper, a total of 2558 PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were compiled from recent patents and literatures and then used for exploring the chemical space and structural features of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by partial least-squares discriminant analysis. The results showed that intramolecular H bond, amphotericity indices, radius of gyration, nonbond electrostatic energy, fractional van der Waals surface area of H-bond donors, octanol-water partition coefficient, and molecular weight are the seven key features discriminating the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors from noninhibitors, with the prediction accuracy larger than 0.90. Based on the seven crystal structures of the PD-L1 dimer complexed with the patent Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) inhibitors, the feasibility of molecular docking for this unconventional binding pocket was further investigated. The results showed that the ensemble-based flexible docking protocol can reproduce the near-native binding conformations of the BMS inhibitors with a strong correlation between the IC50 values and ligand-receptor interaction energies (R = 0.81). In general, this paper delineates, for the first time, the characteristic features of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as well as a high-quality flexible docking strategy for the unconventional binding pocket of the PD-L1 dimer.

SUBMITTER: Kuang Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7581254 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Partial Least-Squares Discriminant Analysis and Ensemble-Based Flexible Docking of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Pilot Study.

Kuang Zuyin Z Heng Yu Y Huang Shuheng S Shi Tingting T Chen Linxin L Xu Lei L Mei Hu H

ACS omega 20201009 41

Although mAbs targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have achieved remarkable therapeutic potential against multiple types of cancer, it is still of great interest for researchers to develop small-molecule PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors without the mAb-related disadvantages of no oral bioavailability and poor solid tumor penetration. However, targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway with small molecules is normally considered challenging because of the ...[more]

PMID: 33111018

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. DESIGN:Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. REVIEW METHODS:Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. RESULTS:4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.

Dataset Information

Partial Least-Squares Discriminant Analysis and Ensemble-Based Flexible Docking of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Pilot Study.

Publications

Partial Least-Squares Discriminant Analysis and Ensemble-Based Flexible Docking of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Pilot Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets