Dataset Information

The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.

ABSTRACT: Objective:The endoscopic findings associated with Helicobacter pylori-naïve status, current infection or past infection are an area of ongoing interest. Previous studies have investigated parameters with a potential diagnostic value. The aim of this study was to perform meta-analysis of the available literature to validate the diagnostic accuracy of mucosal features proposed in the Kyoto classification. Data sources:The databases of MEDLINE and Embase, clinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies from October 1999 to October 2019. Methods:A bivariate random effects model was used to produce pooled diagnostic accuracy calculations for each of the studied endoscopic findings. Diagnostic odds ratios and sensitivity and specificity characteristics were calculated to identify significant predictors of H pylori status. Results:Meta-analysis included 4380 patients in 15 studies. The most significant predictor of an H pylori-naïve status was a regular arrangement of collecting venules (diagnostic odds ratio 55.0, sensitivity 78.3%, specificity 93.8%). Predictors of active H pylori infection were mucosal oedema (18.1, 63.7%, 91.1%) and diffuse redness (14.4, 66.5%, 89.0%). Map-like redness had high specificity for previous H pylori eradication (99.0%), but poor specificity (13.0%). Conclusion:The regular arrangement of collecting venules, mucosal oedema, diffuse redness and map-like redness are important endoscopic findings for determining H pylori status. This meta-analysis provides a tentative basis for developing future endoscopic classification systems.

SUBMITTER: Glover B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7586493 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The endoscopic predictors of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.

Glover Ben B Teare Julian J Ashrafian Hutan H Patel Nisha N

Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy 20200101

<h4>Objective</h4>The endoscopic findings associated with <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>-naïve status, current infection or past infection are an area of ongoing interest. Previous studies have investigated parameters with a potential diagnostic value. The aim of this study was to perform meta-analysis of the available literature to validate the diagnostic accuracy of mucosal features proposed in the Kyoto classification.<h4>Data sources</h4>The databases of MEDLINE and Embase, clinicalTrials.gov an ...[more]

PMID: 33150333

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection using magnifying endoscopy offers advantages over conventional invasive and noninvasive tests.ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy in the prediction of H. pylori infection.MethodsA literature search of the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. A random-effects model was used to calculate the diagnostic efficiency of magnifying endoscopy for H. pylori infection. A summary receiver operator characteristic curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.ResultsA total of 18 studies involving 1897 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnifying endoscopy to predict H. pylori infection were 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.91] and 0.82 (95%CI 0.79-0.85), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9461. When targeting the gastric antrum, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95%CI 0.78-0.86) and 0.72 (95%CI 0.66-0.78), respectively. When targeting the gastric corpus, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95%CI 0.90-0.94) and 0.86 (95%CI 0.82-0.88), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying white light endoscopy were 0.90 (95%CI 0.87-0.91) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.77-0.84), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using magnifying chromoendoscopy were 0.87 (95%CI 0.83-0.91) and 0.85 (95%CI 0.80-0.88), respectively. The "pit plus vascular pattern" classification in the gastric corpus observed by magnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, as indicated by a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.96 (95%CI 0.94-0.97) and 0.91 (95%CI 0.87-0.93), respectively, with an AUC of 0.9872.ConclusionsMagnifying endoscopy was able to accurately predict the status of H. pylori infection, either in magnifying white light endoscopy or magnifying chromoendoscopy mode. The "pit plus vascular pattern" classification in the gastric corpus is an optimum diagnostic criterion.

Project description:BackgroundSince the isolation of Helicobacter species in biliary system, a hypothetical question was raised about the role of these agents in the development of cholelithiasis. This meta-analysis is to explore the association between the Helicobacter infection and biliary lithiasis.Methodology/principal findingsA systematic literature search was performed to identify all eligible articles. Meta-analysis which was carried out using odds ratio and random effect model, 95% confidence intervals for odds ratio was calculated. Quantitative assessment of heterogeneity was explored by chi-square test with significance set at P value 0.10 and was measured using I(2) statistic. Eighteen studies published between 1998 and 2011 were finally eligible for meta-analysis. H. pylori, H. bilis, H. hepaticus, H. pullorum and H. ganmani were studied. With heterogeneity (I(2) = 69.5%, P<0.0001), significantly higher pooled infection rates of H. pylori (OR: 2.59, 35.82% versus 26.75%, P = 0.01) and H. hepaticus (OR: 3.13, 31.30% versus 12.12%, P = 0.02) were observed in lithiasis group. Higher prevalence of H. pylori in cholelithiasis patients were reported by studies from East Asia, South Asia and South America. Evidences supporting the higher presence of H. pylori in cholelithiasis patients could be found by PCR for detecting 16s rRNA in bile, 26 kDa protein gene in biliary tissue and immunohistochemistry. Using multiple detection tests could increase the detection rate of H. pylori.Conclusions/significancesOur meta-analysis suggests a trend of higher presence of H. pylori in cholelithiasis patients than control group and this trend was significant in the regions with higher prevalence of this agent. Evidences supporting the association between Helicobacter and cholelithiasis could be found by using different tests but the gold standard for the identification of these bacteria in biliary system has yet to be established. Considering obvious heterogeneity, a large multi-center study will facilitate us to further clarify the association between the Helicobacter infection and cholelithiasis.

Dataset Information

The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.

Publications

The endoscopic predictors of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets