Dataset Information

Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Features of MicroRNA-206 in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: It has been reported that microRNA-206(miR-206) plays an important role in cancers and could be used as a prognostic biomarker. However, the results are controversial. Therefore, we summarize all available evidence and present a meta-analysis to estimate the prognostic value of miR-206 in various cancers. The relevant studies were collected by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases until August 21, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to explore the association between miR-206 and survival results and clinicopathologic features. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test. Twenty articles involving 2095 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled HR showed that low miR-206 expression was significantly associated with unfavourable overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.03, 95 CI%: 1.53-2.70, P < 0.01). In addition, we found that low miR-206 expression predicted significantly negative association with tumor stage (III-IV VS. I-II) (OR = 4.20, 95% CI: 2.17-8.13, P < 0.01), lymph node status (yes VS. no) (OR = 3.58, 95%: 1.51-8.44, P = 0.004), distant metastasis (yes VS. no) (OR = 3.19, 95%: 1.07-9.50, P = 0.038), and invasion depth (T3 + T4 vs. T2 + T1) (OR = 2.43, 95%: 1.70-3.49, P < 0.01). miR-206 can be used as an effective prognostic indicator in various cancers. Further investigations are warranted to validate the present results.

SUBMITTER: Liu R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7596429 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Features of MicroRNA-206 in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Liu Rongqiang R Zheng Shiyang S Peng Shengjia S Yu Yajie Y Fang Jianwen J Tan Siwen S Yao Fan F Guo Zhihua Z Shao Yi Y

BioMed research international 20201020

It has been reported that microRNA-206(miR-206) plays an important role in cancers and could be used as a prognostic biomarker. However, the results are controversial. Therefore, we summarize all available evidence and present a meta-analysis to estimate the prognostic value of miR-206 in various cancers. The relevant studies were collected by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases until August 21, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs ...[more]

PMID: 33145343

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTripartite motif-containing protein 21 (TRIM21), a member of the ubiquitin ligase family, makes a significant contribution to the ubiquitination of multiple tumor marker proteins associated with tumor cell proliferation, metastasis and selective apoptosis. As the research further develops, an increasing number of studies have manifested that the TRIM21 expression level can be considered an indicator of cancer prognosis. However, the interrelationship between TRIM21 and multiple forms of carcinogens has not been demonstrated in a meta-analysis.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature retrieval in various electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Besides, the hazard ratio (HR) and the pooled relative risk (RR) were integrated in the assessment of cancer incidence and cancer mortality by Stata SE15.1. Additionally, we used an online database based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to further validate our results.ResultsA total of 17 studies were included, totaling 7239 participants. High expression of TRIM21 was significantly correlated with better OS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.91; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91; P < .001). We found that high TRIM21 expression predicted significant impact on clinical characteristics like decreased lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.97-1.30; P < .001), tumor stage (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.82-1.37; P < .001) and tumor grade (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.56-2.05; P < .001). However, TRIM21 expression had no significant impact on other clinical characteristics such as age (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.91-1.25; P = .068), sex (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95-1.12; P = .953), or tumor size (RR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.97-1.33; P = .05). Based on the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) online analysis tool, TRIM21 was significantly downregulated in 5 cancers while significantly upregulated in 2 cancers, and the descending expression of TRIM21 predicted shorter OS in 5 cancers, worse PFS in 2 malignancies, while the elevated expression of TRIM21 predicted shorter OS and worse PFS in 2 carcinomas.ConclusionsTRIM21 could serve as a new biomarker for patients with solid malignancies and could be a potential therapeutic target for patients.

Project description:BackgroundGPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A.MethodsWe first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random-effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I2>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity.ResultsIn total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20-2.38 I2 = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02-1.95 I2 = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33-2.86, I2 = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15-2.92, I2 = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis.ConclusionGPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers.

Project description:BackgroundThe prognostic value of human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) expression in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to summarize available evidence from case-control or cohort studies that evaluated this association.MethodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant studies written in English published up to April 1, 2021, and with no initial date. Furthermore, the Google Scholar and Google databases were also searched manually for gray literature. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020213411). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for end points using fixed- and random-effects statistical models to account for heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot, Begg's and Egger's tests, and the "trim and fill" method.ResultsA total of 30 eligible articles with 5737 unique patients, including 12 studies on colorectal cancer (CRC), 6 on gastric cancer (GC), 5 on esophageal cancer (ESCC), 5 on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 2 on pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC), were retrieved. Both univariate (HR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.48 ~ 2.72) and multivariate (HR = 2.69, 95% CI: 2.03 ~ 3.55) analyses revealed that HLA-G expression was significantly correlated with poor overall survival (OS), regardless of the cancer type or antibody used. Subgroup analysis stratified by antibody showed that the 4H84 (I2 = 45.8%, P = 0.101) antibodies could be trustworthy and reliable for detecting HLA-G expression in GI cancers. In addition, HLA-G expression was found to be correlated with adverse clinicopathological parameters such as clinical stage, nodal status, metastasis, and histological grade but not tumor status.ConclusionElevated HLA-G expression indicates a poor prognosis for GI cancer patients, and screening for this marker could allow for the early diagnosis and treatment of GI cancers to improve survival rates.

Project description:BackgroundDysregulation of the long non-coding RNA small nucleolar RNA host gene 16 (lncRNA SNHG6) has been found in multiple cancers. However, a definite conclusion on the clinical value of lncRNA SNHG6 expression in human cancers has not been determined. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to comprehensively elucidate the association between SNHG6 expression and clinical outcomes in cancers.MethodsA systematic search was performed through the PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wangfang databases for relevant studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected to estimate the prognostic value, and the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were used to evaluate the relationship between lncRNA SNHG6 expression and clinicopathological features, including tumor invasion depth, lymph node metastasis (LNM), distance metastasis (DM), and TNM stage.ResultsIn total, 914 patients from 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that evaluated SNHG6 expression could predict an unfavorable overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.04, 95% CI:1.56-2.52) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.996). Subgroup analysis indicated a significant association between high SNHG6 expression and shorter OS in those studies with digestive system cancers (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.47-2.62), or with sample size < 70 (HR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.29-4.11), or with multivariate analysis (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.44-2.64). Moreover, elevated SNHG6 expression was positively associated with tumor invasion depth (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.18-2.63), LNM (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.18-2.17), DM (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.37-2.64) and advanced TNM stage (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.36-2.60) in patients with cancers.ConclusionsHigh lncRNA SNHG6 expression was correlated with tumor invasion depth, LNM, DM, and advanced TNM stage, suggesting that SNHG6 may serve as a promising prognostic biomarker of human cancers.

Dataset Information

Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Features of MicroRNA-206 in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Publications

Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Features of MicroRNA-206 in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets