Dataset Information

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

GPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A.

Methods

We first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random-effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I2>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity.

Results

In total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20-2.38 I2 = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02-1.95 I2 = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33-2.86, I2 = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15-2.92, I2 = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis.

Conclusion

GPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers.

SUBMITTER: Dai L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8011795 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTripartite motif-containing protein 21 (TRIM21), a member of the ubiquitin ligase family, makes a significant contribution to the ubiquitination of multiple tumor marker proteins associated with tumor cell proliferation, metastasis and selective apoptosis. As the research further develops, an increasing number of studies have manifested that the TRIM21 expression level can be considered an indicator of cancer prognosis. However, the interrelationship between TRIM21 and multiple forms of carcinogens has not been demonstrated in a meta-analysis.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature retrieval in various electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Besides, the hazard ratio (HR) and the pooled relative risk (RR) were integrated in the assessment of cancer incidence and cancer mortality by Stata SE15.1. Additionally, we used an online database based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to further validate our results.ResultsA total of 17 studies were included, totaling 7239 participants. High expression of TRIM21 was significantly correlated with better OS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.91; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91; P < .001). We found that high TRIM21 expression predicted significant impact on clinical characteristics like decreased lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.97-1.30; P < .001), tumor stage (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.82-1.37; P < .001) and tumor grade (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.56-2.05; P < .001). However, TRIM21 expression had no significant impact on other clinical characteristics such as age (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.91-1.25; P = .068), sex (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95-1.12; P = .953), or tumor size (RR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.97-1.33; P = .05). Based on the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) online analysis tool, TRIM21 was significantly downregulated in 5 cancers while significantly upregulated in 2 cancers, and the descending expression of TRIM21 predicted shorter OS in 5 cancers, worse PFS in 2 malignancies, while the elevated expression of TRIM21 predicted shorter OS and worse PFS in 2 carcinomas.ConclusionsTRIM21 could serve as a new biomarker for patients with solid malignancies and could be a potential therapeutic target for patients.

Project description:Background Numerous studies have reported that abnormally HOXA cluster antisense RNA 2 (HOXA-AS2) expression plays a critical role in various cancers. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of HOXA-AS2 in human cancers. Methods Databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data, were searched to retrieve articles on HOXA-AS2 and the prognosis of cancer patients, which were then screened. The association between HOXA-AS2 and overall survival (OS) and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cancers were assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) combined with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A subgroup analysis and the Begg test were used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed to verify the results, and the potential regulation mechanism of HOXA-AS2 in cancers was revealed by an immune analysis. Results A total of 17 articles, comprising 1,176 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that high HOXA-AS2 expression was associated with worse OS, advanced tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis in cancer patients but was not related to age, sex, or poor histological grade. The results of the analysis of TCGA data further supported our findings. Additionally, the immune analysis revealed that the expression of HOXA-AS2 was associated with immune cell infiltration and various immune checkpoints. Conclusions In summary, our results suggest that the high expression of HOXA-AS2 is associated with poor prognosis and the clinicopathological characteristics of cancer patients; thus, it could serve as a prognosis biomarker and therapeutic target for various cancers. However, the small sample size of this study and the inclusion of participants of a single race might have affected the generalizability of our findings. Thus, large-sample, multicenter studies need to be conducted to further evaluate the prognostic role of HOXA-AS2.

Project description:BackgroundThe aberrant regulation of MALAT1 has been indicated to be involved in various carcinogenic pathways contributing to the tumourigenesis and progression of cancers. The current meta-analysis summarized the research advances of MALAT1 functions and analyzed its prognostic value among multiple types of cancers.MethodsEligible studies were identified through retrieving the PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI databases, up to Mar 1, 2018. 28 studies of 5436 patients and 36 studies of 3325 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis to evaluate the association of MALAT1 expression with survival outcomes and clinical parameters.ResultsThe results demonstrated that over-expression of MALAT1 may predict lymph node metastasis (pooled OR = 2.335, 95% CI 1.606-3.395, P = 0.000) and distant metastasis (pooled OR = 2.456, 95% CI 1.407-4.286, P = 0.002). Moreover, MALAT1 was also related with tumour size (pooled OR = 1.875, 95% CI 1.257-2.795, P = 0.002) and TNM stage (pooled OR = 2.034, 95% CI 1.111-3.724, P = 0.021). Additionally, elevated MALAT1 expression could predict poor OS (pooled HR = 2.298, 95% CI 1.953-2.704, P = 0.000), DFS (pooled HR = 2.036, 95% CI 1.240-3.342, P = 0.005), RFS (pooled HR = 2.491, 95% CI 1.505-4.123, P = 0.000), DSS (pooled HR = 2.098, 95% CI 1.372-3.211, P = 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR = 1.842, 95% CI 1.138-2.983, P = 0.013) in multivariate model. Importantly, subgroup analyses disclosed that increased MALAT1 expression had a poor OS among different cancer types (Estrogen-dependent cancer: pooled HR = 2.656, 95% CI 1.560-4.523; urological cancer: pooled HR = 1.952, 95% CI 1.189-3.204; glioma: pooled HR = 2.315, 95% CI 1.643-3.263; digestive cancer: pooled HR = 2.451, 95% CI 1.862-3.227).ConclusionsThe present findings demonstrated that MALAT1 may be a novel biomarker for predicting survival outcome, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis.

Project description:BackgroundDysregulation of the long non-coding RNA small nucleolar RNA host gene 16 (lncRNA SNHG6) has been found in multiple cancers. However, a definite conclusion on the clinical value of lncRNA SNHG6 expression in human cancers has not been determined. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to comprehensively elucidate the association between SNHG6 expression and clinical outcomes in cancers.MethodsA systematic search was performed through the PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wangfang databases for relevant studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected to estimate the prognostic value, and the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were used to evaluate the relationship between lncRNA SNHG6 expression and clinicopathological features, including tumor invasion depth, lymph node metastasis (LNM), distance metastasis (DM), and TNM stage.ResultsIn total, 914 patients from 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that evaluated SNHG6 expression could predict an unfavorable overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.04, 95% CI:1.56-2.52) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.996). Subgroup analysis indicated a significant association between high SNHG6 expression and shorter OS in those studies with digestive system cancers (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.47-2.62), or with sample size < 70 (HR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.29-4.11), or with multivariate analysis (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.44-2.64). Moreover, elevated SNHG6 expression was positively associated with tumor invasion depth (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.18-2.63), LNM (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.18-2.17), DM (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.37-2.64) and advanced TNM stage (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.36-2.60) in patients with cancers.ConclusionsHigh lncRNA SNHG6 expression was correlated with tumor invasion depth, LNM, DM, and advanced TNM stage, suggesting that SNHG6 may serve as a promising prognostic biomarker of human cancers.