Dataset Information

Local staging of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: mammography, ultrasound, or MRI?

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Despite increasingly effective curative breast-conserving treatment (BCT) regimens for primary breast cancer, patients remain at risk for an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). With increasing interest for repeat BCT in selected patients with IBTR, a reliable assessment of the size of IBTR is important for surgical planning. AIM:The primary aim of this study is to establish the performance in size estimation of XMG, US, and breast MRI in patients with IBTR. The secondary aim is to compare the detection of multifocality and contralateral lesions between XMG and MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS:The sizes of IBTR on mammography (XMG), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 159 patients were compared to the sizes at final histopathology. The accuracy of the size estimates was addressed using Pearson's coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. Secondary outcomes were the detection of multifocality and contralateral lesions between XMG and MRI. RESULTS:Both XMG and US significantly underestimated the tumor size by 3.5 and 4.8 mm, respectively, while MRI provided accurate tumor size estimation with a mean underestimation of 1.1 mm. The sensitivity for the detection of multifocality was significantly higher for MRI compared to XMG (25.5% vs. 5.5%). A contralateral malignancy was found in 4.4% of patients, and in 1.9%, it was detected by MRI only. CONCLUSION:The addition of breast MRI to XMG and US in the preoperative workup of IBTR allows for more accurate size estimation. MRI provides a higher sensitivity for the detection of multifocality compared to XMG.

SUBMITTER: Walstra CJEF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7599170 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Local staging of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: mammography, ultrasound, or MRI?

Walstra Coco J E F CJEF Schipper Robert-Jan RJ Winter-Warnars Gonneke A GA Loo Claudette E CE Voogd Adri C AC Vrancken Peeters Marie-Jeanne T F D MTFD Nieuwenhuijzen Grard A P GAP Beets-Tan Regina G H RGH

Breast cancer research and treatment 20200808 2

<h4>Background</h4>Despite increasingly effective curative breast-conserving treatment (BCT) regimens for primary breast cancer, patients remain at risk for an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). With increasing interest for repeat BCT in selected patients with IBTR, a reliable assessment of the size of IBTR is important for surgical planning.<h4>Aim</h4>The primary aim of this study is to establish the performance in size estimation of XMG, US, and breast MRI in patients with IBTR. The ...[more]

PMID: 32770456

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the clinical course and long-term outcomes of patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and identify independent prognostic factors for further recurrence.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed the records of 327 patients who experienced IBTR after undergoing BCS for breast cancer at Asan Medical Center during 1990-2013. Overall survival (OS) after IBTR and cumulative incidence rates of recurrences after IBTR were calculated. The association of clinicopathological factors with survival and the development of further recurrence after IBTR was determined in multivariate analysis.ResultsAt a median follow-up of 127.7 months, 97 patients experienced recurrence after IBTR. The 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence rates of recurrence after IBTR were 32% and 41%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year OS rates after IBTR were 86.6% and 70.3%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, hormone receptor negativity was associated with decreases in OS after IBTR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-6.78). Patients with longer disease-free interval (DFI) had decreased risks of second recurrence (HR .99, 95% CI .99-1.00), and second locoregional recurrence (LRR) (HR .98, 95% CI .97-.99). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) of IBTR was associated with increased recurrence rates (second recurrence-free survival, HR 3.58, 95% CI 2.16-5.94; second LRR free survival, HR 5.21, 95% CI 2.77-9.78; second distant metastasis-free survival, 2.11, 95% CI 1.04-4.30) and lower survival rates (OS after IBTR, HR 4.64, 95% CI 2.23-9.67).ConclusionsDespite subsequent recurrences during long-term follow-up, the survival rates after IBTR remained high. Patients with hormone receptor-negative tumors, shorter DFI, and tumors that present LVI of IBTR had higher risks for recurrence and poor survival rates after IBTR. The study findings may help in understanding the course and prognosis of IBTR patients and identifying high-risk IBTR to establish management strategies.

Dataset Information

Local staging of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: mammography, ultrasound, or MRI?

Publications

Local staging of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: mammography, ultrasound, or MRI?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets