Dataset Information

Real-Time Effort Driven Ventilator Management: A Pilot Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Mechanical ventilation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome should balance lung and diaphragm protective principles, which may be difficult to achieve in routine clinical practice. Through a Phase I clinical trial, we sought to determine whether a computerized decision support-based protocol (real-time effort-driven ventilator management) is feasible to implement, results in improved acceptance for lung and diaphragm protective ventilation, and improves clinical outcomes over historical controls.

Design

Interventional nonblinded pilot study.

Setting

PICU.

Patients

Mechanically ventilated children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Interventions

A computerized decision support tool was tested which prioritized lung-protective management of peak inspiratory pressure-positive end-expiratory pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure/FIO2, and ventilatory rate. Esophageal manometry was used to maintain patient effort in a physiologic range. Protocol acceptance was reported, and enrolled patients were matched 4:1 with respect to age, initial oxygenation index, and percentage of immune compromise to historical control patients for outcome analysis.

Measurements and main results

Thirty-two patients were included. Acceptance of protocol recommendations was over 75%. One-hundred twenty-eight matched historical controls were used for analysis. Compared with historical controls, patients treated with real-time effort-driven ventilator management received lower peak inspiratory pressure-positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume, and higher positive end-expiratory pressure when FIO2 was greater than 0.60. Real-time effort-driven ventilator management was associated with 6 more ventilator-free days, shorter duration until the first spontaneous breathing trial and 3 fewer days on mechanical ventilation among survivors (all p ≤ 0.05) in comparison with historical controls, while maintaining no difference in the rate of reintubation.

Conclusions

A computerized decision support-based protocol prioritizing lung-protective ventilation balanced with reduction of controlled ventilation to maintain physiologic levels of patient effort can be implemented and may be associated with shorter duration of ventilation.

SUBMITTER: Hotz JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7609612 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesCritical care teams are encouraged to follow best practice protocols to help wean mechanically ventilated patients from the ventilator to reduce ventilator-associated events including ventilator-associated conditions, probable ventilator-associated pneumonias, and infection-related ventilator-associated conditions. Providers monitor for alerts suggestive of possible ventilator-associated events and advise when patients should undergo spontaneous breathing trials. Compliance with protocols in most units is suboptimal.DesignRetrospective review of clinical data over 24 months.SettingSt. Joseph Mercy Hospital Candler Hospital Medical-Surgical ICU.PatientsAll mechanically ventilated patients.InterventionsThe Respiratory Knowledge Portal was implemented in our ICU. For 13 months, Respiratory Knowledge Portal data were ported to ICU workstations (control). For the following 11 months, Respiratory Knowledge Portal data were also presented on tablet computers (intervention) for use during multidisciplinary rounds. We performed a retrospective review of Respiratory Knowledge Portal data from before and after the implementation of the tablet computers.Measurements and main resultsData were collected from 337 patients (187 control group, 150 intervention group). A decrease in the occurrence of ventilator-associated events was observed during the intervention group compared with the control group. Only 2.0% of patients in the intervention group experienced any category of ventilator-associated event, while 11.2% of patients in the control group experienced one event (p = 0.003). Intervention patients experienced less ventilator-associated conditions (p = 0.002), infection-related ventilator-associated conditions (p = 0.026), and probable ventilator-associated pneumonias (p = 0.036) than control patients. Twenty-one of the 24 patients with any ventilator-associated events were in the control group. There was no significant difference between the days spent on ventilation nor hospital length of stay in the control compared with intervention group patients.ConclusionsFewer ventilator-associated events, ventilator-associated conditions, infection-related ventilator-associated conditions, and probable ventilator-associated pneumonias were seen during the period when Respiratory Knowledge Portal monitoring data was presented on tablet computers. There was no difference in time on ventilator nor overall length of stay.

Project description:BackgroundWheelchair users with a spinal cord injury (SCI) are at a high risk for developing pressure injuries (PIs). Performing weight shifts is a primary method of pressure management for PI prevention; however, individuals with SCI may lack confidence in their abilities to perform adequate pressure relief due to their lack of sensation. Real-time seat interface pressure mapping feedback may provide partial substitution for sensory feedback such that an individual's confidence is improved.ObjectiveWe aim to examine how confidence for pressure management by wheelchair users with SCI was impacted by providing access to real-time, on-demand seat interface pressure mapping feedback.MethodsAdults with SCI (N=23) completed self-efficacy questions addressing confidence around 4 factors related to performing weight shifts in this longitudinal, repeated-measures study. We evaluated the impact of providing standard PI prevention education and access to live pressure map feedback on confidence levels for performing weight shifts.ResultsAccess to live pressure map feedback while learning how to perform weight shifts resulted in significantly higher confidence about moving far enough to relieve pressure at high-risk areas. Confidence for adhering to the recommended weight shift frequency and duration was not significantly impacted by in-clinic education or use of pressure map feedback. Confidence that performing weight shifts reduces PI risk increased most following education, with slight additional increase when pressure map feedback was added.ConclusionsAccess to live pressure mapping feedback improves confidence about performing weight shifts that relieve pressure when provided in the clinical setting and demonstrates potential for the same in the home. This preliminary exploration of a smartphone-based pressure mapping intervention highlights the value of access to continuous pressure mapping feedback to improve awareness and confidence for managing pressure.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03987243; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03987243.