Dataset Information

Proteomic repository data submission, dissemination, and reuse: key messages.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The creation of ProteomeXchange data workflows in 2012 transformed the field of proteomics, consisting of the standardization of data submission and dissemination and enabling the widespread reanalysis of public MS proteomics data worldwide. ProteomeXchange has triggered a growing trend toward public dissemination of proteomics data, facilitating the assessment, reuse, comparative analyses, and extraction of new findings from public datasets. By 2022, the consortium is integrated by PRIDE, PeptideAtlas, MassIVE, jPOST, iProX, and Panorama Public.

Areas covered

Here, we review and discuss the current ecosystem of resources, guidelines, and file formats for proteomics data dissemination and reanalysis. Special attention is drawn to new exciting quantitative and post-translational modification-oriented resources. The challenges and future directions on data depositions including the lack of metadata and cloud-based and high-performance software solutions for fast and reproducible reanalysis of the available data are discussed.

Expert opinion

The success of ProteomeXchange and the amount of proteomics data available in the public domain have triggered the creation and/or growth of other protein knowledgebase resources. Data reuse is a leading, active, and evolving field; supporting the creation of new formats, tools, and workflows to rediscover and reshape the public proteomics data.

SUBMITTER: Perez-Riverol Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7614296 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Proteomic repository data submission, dissemination, and reuse: key messages.

Perez-Riverol Yasset Y

Expert review of proteomics 20220701 7-12

<h4>Introduction</h4>The creation of ProteomeXchange data workflows in 2012 transformed the field of proteomics, consisting of the standardization of data submission and dissemination and enabling the widespread reanalysis of public MS proteomics data worldwide. ProteomeXchange has triggered a growing trend toward public dissemination of proteomics data, facilitating the assessment, reuse, comparative analyses, and extraction of new findings from public datasets. By 2022, the consortium is integ ...[more]

PMID: 36529941

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe variety of medical documentation often leads to incompatible data elements that impede data integration between institutions. A common approach to standardize and distribute metadata definitions are ISO/IEC 11179 norm-compliant metadata repositories with top-down standardization. To the best of our knowledge, however, it is not yet common practice to reuse the content of publicly accessible metadata repositories for creation of case report forms or routine documentation. We suggest an alternative concept called pragmatic metadata repository, which enables a community-driven bottom-up approach for agreeing on data collection models. A pragmatic metadata repository collects real-world documentation and considers frequent metadata definitions as high quality with potential for reuse.MethodsWe implemented a pragmatic metadata repository proof of concept application and filled it with medical forms from the Portal of Medical Data Models. We applied this prototype in two use cases to demonstrate its capabilities for reusing metadata: first, integration into a study editor for the suggestion of data elements and, second, metadata synchronization between two institutions. Moreover, we evaluated the emergence of bottom-up standards in the prototype and two medical data managers assessed their quality for 24 medical concepts.ResultsThe resulting prototype contained 466,569 unique metadata definitions. Integration into the study editor led to a reuse of 1836 items and item groups. During the metadata synchronization, semantic codes of 4608 data elements were transferred. Our evaluation revealed that for less complex medical concepts weak bottom-up standards could be established. However, more diverse disease-related concepts showed no convergence of data elements due to an enormous heterogeneity of metadata. The survey showed fair agreement (Kalpha = 0.50, 95% CI 0.43-0.56) for good item quality of bottom-up standards.ConclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility of the pragmatic metadata repository concept for medical documentation. Applications of the prototype in two use cases suggest that it facilitates the reuse of data elements. Our evaluation showed that bottom-up standardization based on a large collection of real-world metadata can yield useful results. The proposed concept shall not replace existing top-down approaches, rather it complements them by showing what is commonly used in the community to guide other researchers.

Project description:Background. Attribution to the original contributor upon reuse of published data is important both as a reward for data creators and to document the provenance of research findings. Previous studies have found that papers with publicly available datasets receive a higher number of citations than similar studies without available data. However, few previous analyses have had the statistical power to control for the many variables known to predict citation rate, which has led to uncertain estimates of the "citation benefit". Furthermore, little is known about patterns in data reuse over time and across datasets. Method and Results. Here, we look at citation rates while controlling for many known citation predictors and investigate the variability of data reuse. In a multivariate regression on 10,555 studies that created gene expression microarray data, we found that studies that made data available in a public repository received 9% (95% confidence interval: 5% to 13%) more citations than similar studies for which the data was not made available. Date of publication, journal impact factor, open access status, number of authors, first and last author publication history, corresponding author country, institution citation history, and study topic were included as covariates. The citation benefit varied with date of dataset deposition: a citation benefit was most clear for papers published in 2004 and 2005, at about 30%. Authors published most papers using their own datasets within two years of their first publication on the dataset, whereas data reuse papers published by third-party investigators continued to accumulate for at least six years. To study patterns of data reuse directly, we compiled 9,724 instances of third party data reuse via mention of GEO or ArrayExpress accession numbers in the full text of papers. The level of third-party data use was high: for 100 datasets deposited in year 0, we estimated that 40 papers in PubMed reused a dataset by year 2, 100 by year 4, and more than 150 data reuse papers had been published by year 5. Data reuse was distributed across a broad base of datasets: a very conservative estimate found that 20% of the datasets deposited between 2003 and 2007 had been reused at least once by third parties. Conclusion. After accounting for other factors affecting citation rate, we find a robust citation benefit from open data, although a smaller one than previously reported. We conclude there is a direct effect of third-party data reuse that persists for years beyond the time when researchers have published most of the papers reusing their own data. Other factors that may also contribute to the citation benefit are considered. We further conclude that, at least for gene expression microarray data, a substantial fraction of archived datasets are reused, and that the intensity of dataset reuse has been steadily increasing since 2003.

Dataset Information

Proteomic repository data submission, dissemination, and reuse: key messages.

Introduction

Areas covered

Expert opinion

Publications

Proteomic repository data submission, dissemination, and reuse: key messages.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets