Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Bias and Loss to Follow-Up in Cardiovascular Randomized Trials: A Systematic Review.


ABSTRACT: Background Loss to follow-up (LTFU) is common in randomized controlled trials. However, its potential impact on primary outcomes from cardiovascular randomized controlled trials is not known. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42019121959) for randomized controlled trials published in 8 leading journals over 5 years from January 2014 to December 2018. Extent, reporting, and handling of LTFU data were recorded, and the proportion of a trial's primary outcome results that lose statistical significance was calculated after making plausible assumptions for the intervention and control arms. These assumptions could drive differential treatment effects between the groups considering relative event incidence between LTFU participants and those included in the primary outcome. We identified 117 randomized controlled trials of which 91 (78%) trials reported LTFU, 23 (20%) reported no LTFU, and 3 (3%) trials did not report on whether LTFU occurred. The median percentage of study participants lost to follow-up was 2% (interquartile range, 0.33%-5.3%). Only 10 trials (9%) had a low cluster of risk factors for impairment in trial quality. The percentage of trials losing statistical significance varied from 2% when the relative event incidence for LTFU between the randomized groups was 1 for the intervention arm and 1.5 for the control arm to 16% when the relative event incidence was 3 for the intervention arm and 1 for the control arm. Conclusions Almost 1 in 6 (16%) cardiovascular randomized trials published in leading journals may have a change in the primary outcome if plausible assumptions are made about differential event rates of participants lost to follow up. There is scope for improvement arising from LTFU in randomized trials in cardiovascular medicine. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; Unique identifier: CRD42019121959.

SUBMITTER: Fong LCW 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7660731 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Bias and Loss to Follow-Up in Cardiovascular Randomized Trials: A Systematic Review.

Fong Lucas Chun Wah LCW   Ford Thomas J TJ   da Costa Bruno R BR   Jüni Peter P   Berry Colin C  

Journal of the American Heart Association 20200709 14


Background Loss to follow-up (LTFU) is common in randomized controlled trials. However, its potential impact on primary outcomes from cardiovascular randomized controlled trials is not known. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42019121959) for randomized controlled trials published in 8 leading journals over 5 years from January 2014 to December 2018. Extent, reporting, and handling of LTFU data were recorded, and the proportion of a trial's primary ou  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5975470 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5008911 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10435726 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6667274 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5102324 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3940821 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8282325 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3511681 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8059856 | biostudies-literature
2005-01-18 | GSE1907 | GEO