Dataset Information

NK cell infiltration is associated with improved overall survival in solid cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: The immune landscape of a tumor is highly connected to patient prognosis and response to treatment, but little is known about how natural killer (NK) cells predict overall survival (OS) among patients with solid tumors. We present the first meta-analysis on NK cell infiltration into solid tumors as a prognostic indicator for OS, considering cancer types independently, and together. Samples were collected from 1973 to 2016 with results published between 1989 and 2020. From 53 studies, we found that NK cell infiltration corresponds with decreased risk of death (HR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.26-0.46; p<0.0001). Among studies that investigated the prognostic potential of NK cells in specific regions of the tumor, intraepithelial infiltration was better predictive of OS than NK infiltration in the tumor-adjacent stroma. Generally, NK cell infiltration is lower in advanced-stage and lower-grade tumors; nevertheless, it remains prognostically beneficial. This meta-analysis highlights an important prognostic role of NK cells in solid tumors, but exposes that few studies have considered the contributions of NK cells. Toward NK cell-based immunotherapies, it will be important to understand the conditions under which NK cells can be effective agents of tumor control.

SUBMITTER: Nersesian S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7670197 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

NK cell infiltration is associated with improved overall survival in solid cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nersesian Sarah S Schwartz Sarah L SL Grantham Stephanie R SR MacLean Leah K LK Lee Stacey N SN Pugh-Toole Morgan M Boudreau Jeanette E JE

Translational oncology 20201110 1

The immune landscape of a tumor is highly connected to patient prognosis and response to treatment, but little is known about how natural killer (NK) cells predict overall survival (OS) among patients with solid tumors. We present the first meta-analysis on NK cell infiltration into solid tumors as a prognostic indicator for OS, considering cancer types independently, and together. Samples were collected from 1973 to 2016 with results published between 1989 and 2020. From 53 studies, we found th ...[more]

PMID: 33186888

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeImmune system modulation, with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, has drastically changed the field of oncology. Strong preclinical data indicate that radiation therapy (RT) may enhance the response rate to such drugs via in situ vaccination, although these data do not consider immune radiotoxicity. This meta-analysis investigates whether radio-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is associated with overall survival (OS).Methods and materialsA systematic literature search and quantitative analysis were planned, conducted, and reported per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses checklists. The literature from January 1990 to March 2021 was searched to identify clinical studies with OS data in patients treated with RT and presenting with lymphopenia. A random-effect model was employed for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was estimated using a P-curve analysis.ResultsA total of 56 studies with 13 223 patients and 11 types of cancers were selected. The mean follow-up time was 35.9 months. Over a third of patients had RIL (37.25%). After removing outlying studies (n = 14), the between-study heterogeneity variance was estimated at t2 = 0.018 (P = .01) with an I2 value of 36.0% (95% confidence interval, 6%-56%). The results showed that RIL was significantly associated with worse OS (hazard ratio: 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-1.86; P < .01; 95% prediction interval, 1.27-2.26). A subgroup analysis was performed based on the type of primary tumor, and a difference between the subgroups was found (P < .01). Based on the P-curve analysis, a significant evidential value was found, and no significant publication bias was identified among the studies.ConclusionsRIL is a significant prognostic factor for mortality in virtually all solid cancers. Pooled-effect estimates indicate a significantly reduced risk of death in patients without RIL. Tailoring RT regimens to spare the immune system and updating dosimetric constraints for new organs at risk, such as major blood vessels, organs with rich blood supplies, bones, and all lymph node areas, may improve prognoses.

Project description:Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a DNA damage repair protein, and its inhibitors have shown promising results in clinical trials. The prognostic significance of PARP is inconsistent in studies of various cancers. In the present study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to reveal the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PARP expression in multiple solid cancers. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for relevant research articles published from 2005 to 2021. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) with confidence interval (CI) was calculated to investigate the relationship between PARP expression and survival in multiple solid cancers. In total, 10,667 patients from 31 studies were included. A significant association was found between higher PARP expression and overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.34-1.76, p < 0.001), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.10-1.21, p < 0.001), and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03-1.08, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that PARP overexpression was significantly related to poor OS in patients with breast cancers (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.28-1.49, p < 0.001), ovary cancers (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.10-1.33, p = 0.001), lung cancers (HR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.29-3.45, p = 0.003), and liver cancers (HR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.94-5.58, p < 0.001). Regarding ethnicity, Asian people have almost twice their worst survival rate compared to Caucasians. The pooled odds ratio analysis showed a significant relationship between higher PARP expression and larger tumour size, poor tumour differentiation, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, higher TNM stage and lymphovascular invasion, and positive immunoreactivity for Ki-67, BRCA1, and BRCA2. In addition, nuclear expression assessed by the QS system using Abcam and Santa Cruz Biotechnology seems to be the most commonly used and reproducible IHC method for assessing PARP expression. This meta-analysis revealed that higher PARP expression was associated with a worse OS, DFS, and PFS in patients with solid cancers. Moreover, inhibition of this pathway through its specific inhibitors may extend the survival of patients with higher PARP expression.

Project description:ImportanceSex-associated differences in immune response are known, but a meta-analysis suggested men, compared with women, derive greater value from immunotherapy for advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms. However, methodologic concerns and subsequent trials have placed these results in doubt.ObjectiveTo perform an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis that assesses the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced cancers according to patient sex.Design, setting, and participantsA systematic review of studies (n = 23) indexed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus from inception of these databases to October 2, 2018, was conducted. Randomized clinical trials that compared immunotherapy with standard of care in the treatment of advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms were included if overall survival was reported as an outcome and if data stratified by patient sex were available. Observational studies, editorials, commentaries, review articles, non-peer-reviewed publications, studies that compared various immunotherapy regimens, studies that reported other measures of oncologic response, and studies that reported subgroup analyses for 1 sex only were excluded.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival, with a test for heterogeneity between women and men, to assess the null hypothesis that no difference in the survival advantage of immunotherapy exists by patient sex.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 23 randomized clinical trials that reported on 9322 men (67.9%) and 4399 women (32.1%); the age of most patients was in the 70s. An overall survival benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81; P < .001) and women (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88; P = .002). Random-effects meta-analysis of study-level differences in response to immunotherapy demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the sexes (I2 = 38%; P = .60). Subgroup analyses according to disease site, line of therapy, class of immunotherapy, study methodology, and representation of women recapitulated these findings.Conclusions and relevanceStratified analyses demonstrated no statistically significant association of patient sex with the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced cancers using overall survival as the outcome.

Project description:Sarcopenia measured through body composition analysis is emerging as an important prognosticator among various malignancies, including oesophageal cancer. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) as determined by the third lumbar vertebrae on cross-sectional CT images has been demonstrated as a predictor of overall survival in oesophageal cancer, using pre-defined cut off values for sarcopenia. However, this is largely within the setting of resectable disease. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of sarcopenia defined by SMI on overall-survival in patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer. On 30 January 2021, a systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify the role of SMI among patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer, with overall survival as the primary outcome. Databases included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria included age >18, diagnosis of oesophageal cancer, and non-operative management. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 using an inverse variance, random effects model. After the removal of duplicates, 2755 unique search results were obtained. Manual screening of titles and abstracts resulted in 287 full text articles that were reviewed. Of these, five studies met the inclusion criteria with data evaluating the effect of sarcopenia defined by SMI on overall survival. A total of 783 patients, the majority of which were male (n = 638, 81%), with a mean age of 68 ± 2.3 years were included. 641 (82%) patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma. Sarcopenia, as determined by SMI using pre-defined cut-off values, was reported in 517 patients (66%). Meta-analysis demonstrated decreased overall survival in the sarcopenia group compared with the non-sarcopenia group (HR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.21-1.89; P = 0.0003; I2 = 0%; Figure 1). No significant publication bias was noted on assessment of funnel plot and Egger's test (P = 0.295). Sarcopenia as defined by SMI is predictive of overall survival among patients with nonoperative oesophageal cancer. Further analysis on the effect of sarcopenia on treatment related adverse effects and complications, particularly related to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and oesophageal stenting, is needed to identify the degree of prognostication offered by body composition analysis. Studies on the modifiability of sarcopenia will help determine the utility of nutritional interventions.

Project description:BackgroundLiving donor liver transplantation (LDLT) provides an alternative to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for patients with end-stage liver disease in the circumstance of scarcity of deceased grafts. However, the outcomes of LDLT remain controversial.MethodA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LDLT with DDLT. Twelve outcomes were assessed.ResultsThirty-nine studies involving 38563 patients were included. LDLT was comparable in red blood cell transfusion, perioperative mortality, length of hospital stay, retransplantation rate, hepatitis C virus recurrence rate, and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate with DDLT. Cold ischemia time was shorter and duration of recipient operation was longer in LDLT. Postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding rate occurred less frequently in LDLT recipients (odds ratio (OR) = 0.64, 95%confidence interval (CI) = 0.46 - 0.88, P = 0.006), but this did not decrease the perioperative mortality. LDLT was associated with significantly higher biliary (OR = 2.23, 95%CI = 1.59 - 3.13, P < 0.00001) and vascular (OR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.31 - 3.07, P = 0.001) complication rates and better overall survival (OS) (1 year: OR = 1.32, 95%CI = 1.01 - 1.72, P = 0.04; 3 years: OR = 1.39, 95%CI = 1.14 - 1.69, P = 0.0010; and 5 years: OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.04 - 1.70, P = 0.02). According to subgroup analysis, biliary complication rate and OS improved dramatically as experience increased, while vascular complication rate could not be improved because it was mainly caused by the difference of the donor type itself.ConclusionsLDLT remains a valuable option for patients in need of liver transplantation for it provides an excellent alternative to DDLT without compromising recipient outcomes. Further refinement in biliary and vascular reconstruction techniques and the accumulation of liver transplantation centers' experience are the key factors in expanding the application of LDLT.

Dataset Information

NK cell infiltration is associated with improved overall survival in solid cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publications

NK cell infiltration is associated with improved overall survival in solid cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets