Dataset Information

A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study of a single dose of febuxostat in healthy subjects.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

To examine the pharmacokinetic-phamacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships of plasma febuxostat and serum urate and the effect of a single dose of the drug on renal excretion and fractional clearance of urate (FCU).

Methods

Blood and urine samples were collected at baseline and up to 145 hours following administration of febuxostat (80 mg) to healthy subjects (n = 9). Plasma febuxostat and serum and urinary urate and creatinine concentrations were determined. Febuxostat pharmacokinetics were estimated using a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. An Emax PK-PD model was fitted to mean febuxostat and urate concentrations. Urinary urate excretion and FCU were calculated pre- and post-dose.

Results

Maximum mean plasma concentration of febuxostat (2.7 mg L^-1 ) was observed 1.2 hours after dosage. Febuxostat initial and terminal half-lives were 2.0 ± 1.0 and 14.0 ± 4.7 hours (mean ± SD), respectively. The majority (81%) of the drug was eliminated in the 9 hours after dosing. Serum urate declined slowly achieving mean nadir (0.20 mmol L^-1 ) at 24 hours. The IC₅₀ (plasma febuxostat concentration that inhibits urate production by 50%) was 0.11 ± 0.09 mg L^-1 (mean ± SD). Urinary urate excretion changed in parallel with serum urate. There was no systematic or significant change in FCU from baseline.

Conclusion

The PK-PD model could potentially be used to individualise febuxostat treatment and improve clinical outcomes. A single dose of febuxostat does not affect the efficiency of the kidney to excrete urate. Further investigations are required to confirm the present results following multiple dosing with febuxostat.

SUBMITTER: Kamel B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7688545 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivePerampanel is a once-daily oral anti-seizure medication indicated for focal-onset seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. This study investigated the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of perampanel in healthy Chinese adults.MethodsStudy 052 (NCT03424564) was a phase I, single-center, open-label, parallel-group study. In the single-dose part of the study, subjects received a single oral dose of perampanel 2, 4, or 8 mg. In the multiple-dose part, subjects received once-daily oral perampanel 2 mg on Days 1-7 and 4 mg on Days 8-21. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from perampanel plasma concentrations using non-compartmental analysis. Dose proportionality after single doses of perampanel was assessed. Safety and tolerability were evaluated.ResultsIn the single-dose part (N = 30), median time to reach maximum concentration (tmax) was 0.75-1.0 h, mean terminal elimination phase half-life (t½) was 85.6-122 h, mean maximum observed concentration (Cmax) was 77.9-276 ng/mL, and mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t)) was 4070-15100 ng·h/mL. Single-dose pharmacokinetics were linear for perampanel 2-8 mg. In the multiple-dose part (N = 12), Day 21 steady-state (4 mg/day) parameters were median time at which the highest drug concentration occurs at steady state (tss,max), 1.25 h; mean t½, 109 h; mean maximum observed concentration at steady state (Css,max), 453 ng/mL; and mean area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval on multiple dosing (AUC(0- τ)), 7540 ng·h/mL. For single- and multiple-dose perampanel, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness and somnolence.ConclusionsSingle- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of perampanel in healthy Chinese adults revealed rapid perampanel absorption, slow elimination, and a linear relationship with single perampanel doses of 2-8 mg. Findings were consistent with previous studies of perampanel pharmacokinetics in other ethnic/racial populations of healthy subjects. Single and multiple doses of perampanel were generally safe and well tolerated.Clinical trial registrationNCT03424564; registered February 2018.

Project description:Background and objectiveRosuvastatin and ezetimibe are commonly applied in lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy. However, the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction was not clear by the coadministration of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe. This study investigated the pharmacodynamic (PD) and PK interactions between rosuvastatin and ezetimibe through a crossover clinical trial.Subjects and methodsA randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover study with two treatment parts was conducted in healthy male subjects. Study part A involved rosuvastatin, and study part B involved ezetimibe. A total of 25 subjects in both parts completed the PK and PD evaluations. Rosuvastatin (20 mg) or ezetimibe (10 mg) was administered once daily for 7 days as monotherapy or co-therapy. The plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin, total ezetimibe and free ezetimibe were measured for 72 h after day 7. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) were investigated for the PD assessments on day 1 (pretreatment) and day 8.ResultsRosuvastatin and ezetimibe presented multiple peaks. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios for the peak plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during the dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) of rosuvastatin and total ezetimibe were within the range 0.8-1.25. However, the coadministration increased the systemic exposure of free ezetimibe. In the PD assessments, rosuvastatin and ezetimibe monotherapy reduced the LDL-C and TC levels effectively. In addition, the lipid-lowering effects of the coadministration corresponded to an approximate summation of the effects of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe monotherapy. However, no significant changes in HDL-C were observed with rosuvastatin or ezetimibe treatment. No significant safety issue was noted.ConclusionThe coadministration of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe revealed a bioequivalent PK interaction. Additional lipid-lowering effects, including decreased LDL-C and TC, were observed as expected in combination therapy without significant safety concern.