Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of Smartphone Photography, Single-Lens Reflex Photography, and Field-Grading for Trachoma.


ABSTRACT: Conjunctival examination for trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) guides public health decisions for trachoma. Smartphone cameras may allow remote conjunctival grading, but previous studies have found low sensitivity. A random sample of 412 children aged 1-9 years received an in-person conjunctival examination and then had conjunctival photographs taken with 1) a single-lens reflex (SLR) camera and 2) a smartphone coupled to a 3D-printed magnifying attachment. Three masked graders assessed the conjunctival photographs for TF. Latent class analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each grading method for TF. Single-lens reflex photo-grading was 95.0% sensitive and 93.6% specific, and smartphone photo-grading was 84.1% sensitive and 97.6% specific. The sensitivity of the smartphone-CellScope device was considerably higher than that of a previous study using the native smartphone camera, without attachment. Magnification of smartphone images with a simple attachment improved the grading sensitivity while maintaining high specificity in a region with hyperendemic trachoma.

SUBMITTER: Nesemann JM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7695070 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of Smartphone Photography, Single-Lens Reflex Photography, and Field-Grading for Trachoma.

Nesemann John M JM   Seider Michael I MI   Snyder Blake M BM   Maamari Robi N RN   Fletcher Daniel A DA   Haile Berhan A BA   Tadesse Zerihun Z   Varnado Nicole E NE   Cotter Sun Y SY   Callahan Elizabeth Kelly EK   Emerson Paul M PM   Margolis Todd P TP   Lietman Thomas M TM   Keenan Jeremy D JD  

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene 20201001 6


Conjunctival examination for trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) guides public health decisions for trachoma. Smartphone cameras may allow remote conjunctival grading, but previous studies have found low sensitivity. A random sample of 412 children aged 1-9 years received an in-person conjunctival examination and then had conjunctival photographs taken with 1) a single-lens reflex (SLR) camera and 2) a smartphone coupled to a 3D-printed magnifying attachment. Three masked graders assessed  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7852658 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6543857 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4006735 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9890315 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2808431 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8601615 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7727942 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5035083 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7780497 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7412381 | biostudies-literature