Dataset Information

Recent/Childhood Adversities and Mental Disorders Among US Immigrants.

ABSTRACT: Past research documents the heterogeneity in US immigrants, particularly in terms of racial and ethnic categories and specific ethnic subgroups. The present study builds on this research foundation by investigating heterogeneity in immigrants' experiences of adversity, both recent and during childhood, and associations with mental disorders. Data are drawn from 6,131 adult immigrants in the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. Prevalence estimates for mental disorders and adversities were calculated overall and by gender. Latent class analysis was utilized to characterize patterns of self-reported experiences of childhood and recent adversities, and multinomial logistic regression established the statistical association between latent class membership and past-year mental disorder outcomes (substance use disorder only, mood/anxiety/trauma disorder only, co-occurring disorder, or no mental disorder). Neglect was the most commonly-reported childhood adversity among immigrant men and women. Prevalence of meeting criteria for a substance use disorder only, or a mood/anxiety/trauma disorder only, varied between men and women, yet no gender differences were observed in prevalence of co-occurring disorders. For latent class analyses, a five-class solution was selected based on fit indices and parsimony. Approximately 10.0% of the sample was categorized in the latent class characterized by severe childhood adversities, while 57.5% was classified in the latent class with low probabilities of reported adversities. The relative risk of meeting criteria for a past-year substance use disorder only (compared to no substance use or mood/anxiety/trauma disorder) was more than three times as high for members of the class with severe childhood adversities (RRR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.08-5.10), as well as the class with recent employment/financial adversities (RRR, 3.82; 95% CI, 2.36-6.19), compared to the class with low adversities. The relative risk of past-year co-occurring disorders (compared to no disorder) was more than 12 times as high for those in the severe childhood adversities class (RRR, 12.21; 95% CI, 7.06-21.10), compared to the class with low adversities. Findings underscore the importance of considering both recent and childhood adversities when assessing and providing services for US immigrant groups.

SUBMITTER: Cano M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7703683 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Recent/Childhood Adversities and Mental Disorders Among US Immigrants.

Cano Manuel M Takeuchi David T DT

Frontiers in psychiatry 20201109

Past research documents the heterogeneity in US immigrants, particularly in terms of racial and ethnic categories and specific ethnic subgroups. The present study builds on this research foundation by investigating heterogeneity in immigrants' experiences of adversity, both recent and during childhood, and associations with mental disorders. Data are drawn from 6,131 adult immigrants in the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. Prevalence estimates for me ...[more]

PMID: 33312137

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveChildhood adversities have been linked to poor health outcomes in adults, including both mood and general medical disorders. Here we tested the hypothesis that childhood adversities specifically increase the risk of comorbidity between mood and general medical disorders, rather than increasing the risk of either one independently.MethodsMood disorders (DSM-IV major depressive, dysthymic and bipolar disorders), childhood adversities and general medical disorders were assessed in 2060 adults in the WHO World Mental Health Survey Portugal. Discrete-time survival analyses were used to investigate the association between mood disorders and subsequent first-onset general medical disorders and between general medical disorders and subsequent first-onset mood disorders, in adults. Discrete-time survival and multinomial regression analyses were used to test the influence of childhood adversities on the comorbidity between mood disorders and general medical disorders. Anxiety disorders were used as a psychiatric control.ResultsAdult-onset mood disorders were found to precede the onset of diabetes (OR:1.8; 95% CI:1.2-2.9), arthritis (OR:1.6; 95% CI:1.1-2.3) and seasonal allergies (OR:1.6; 95% CI:1.1-2.5) while adult-onset hypertension was found to precede the onset of mood disorders (OR:1.7; 95% CI:1.2-2.6). Maladaptive family functioning (abuse, neglect and parental maladjustment), was associated with mood disorders (OR:1.5; 95% CI:1.2-1.9), hypertension (OR:1.4; 95% CI:1.1-1.7), arthritis (OR:1.3; 95% CI:1.0-1.6) and seasonal allergies (OR:1.5; 95% CI:1.1-2.0) in adulthood. Finally, the effect of maladaptive family functioning in predicting comorbid mood disorders and arthritis significantly differed from its effect in predicting only arthritis (p = 0.01), which was not observed for other comorbidities. Maladaptive family functioning further predicted comorbid anxiety disorders and hypertension.ConclusionChildhood adversities may be a specific risk factor for comorbid mood disorders and arthritis in adults.

Project description:BackgroundThe coexistence of self-harm and aggression, which is referred to as dual-harm, is commonly seen in forensic population. Self-harm and aggression have often been studied separately, previous studies on risk factors of aggression or self-harm mainly focused on childhood adversities, emotional regulation, impulsivity and psychopathology, given their importance in the two behaviors. However, the factors associated with dual-harm remain unclear. This study aimed to explore potential risk factors associated with co-occurring self-harm among individuals with serious aggressive behaviors.MethodsThis multi-center, cross-sectional case-control study was conducted from May 2013 to January 2016 and involved seven qualified forensic institutes located in seven provinces in China. Participants were individuals with serious aggressive behaviors and were suspected to have mental disorders. Lifetime history of self-harm was obtained by a self-report questionnaire, and serious aggressive behaviors were assessed with the use of participants' forensic archive. Sociodemographic and clinical information were collected using a self-designed standardized data collection form, and childhood adversities was assessed using a clinician-rated scale designed by our research team. The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) was used to assess psychopathic traits and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was used to assess psychiatric symptoms of the participants. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the relevant factors for dual-harm.ResultsA total of 423 individuals with serious aggressive behaviors were enrolled in the current study. Of them, 74 (17.5%) with self-harm history assigned into the dual-harm group (D-H) and 349 (82.5%) without self-harm history assigned into the aggression-only group (A-O). According to the binary logistic regression analysis, current diagnosis of mood disorder (OR = 3.2, 95%CI: 1.2-8.5), child abuse (OR = 2.8, 95%CI: 1.3-6.2), parental death (OR = 3.0, 95%CI: 1.2-7.5), and the score of the affective subscale in BPRS (OR = 1.7, 95%CI: 1.3-2.4) were significantly associated with dual-harm.ConclusionsOur study suggested the necessity of integrated evaluation of self-harm among individuals with serious aggressive behaviors. Childhood adversities and psychiatric symptoms in this population require special attention.

Dataset Information

Recent/Childhood Adversities and Mental Disorders Among US Immigrants.

Publications

Recent/Childhood Adversities and Mental Disorders Among US Immigrants.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets