Dataset Information

Multiple MitraClips: The balancing act between pressure gradient and regurgitation.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip is used for the symptomatic management of mitral regurgitation (MR). The challenge is reducing MR while avoiding an elevated mitral valve gradient (MVG). This study assesses how multiple MitraClips used to treat MR can affect valve performance.

Methods

Six porcine mitral valves were assessed using an in vitro left heart simulator in the native, moderate-to-severe MR, and severe MR cases. MR cases were tested in the no-MitraClip, 1-MitraClip, and 2-MitraClip configurations. Mitral regurgitant fraction (MRF), MVG, and effective orifice area (EOA) were quantified.

Results

Native MRF, MVG, and EOA were 14.22%, 2.59 mm Hg, and 1.64 cm², respectively. For moderate-to-severe MR, MRF, MVG, and EOA were 34.07%, 3.31 mm Hg, and 2.22 cm², respectively. Compared with the no-MitraClip case, 1 MitraClip decreased MRF to 18.57% (P < .0001) and EOA to 1.50 cm² (P = .0002). MVG remained statistically unchanged (3.44 mm Hg). Two MitraClips decreased MRF to 14.26% (P < .0001) and EOA to 1.36 cm² (P = .0001). MVG remained unchanged (3.29 mm Hg). For severe MR, MRF, MVG, and EOA were 59.79%, 4.98 mm Hg, and 2.73 cm², respectively. Compared with the no-MitraClip case, 1 MitraClip decreased MRF to 30.72% (P < .0001) and EOA to 1.82 cm² (P < .0001); MVG remained unchanged (4.03 mm Hg). MVG remained statistically unchanged. Two MitraClips decreased MRF to 23.10% (P < .0001) and EOA to 1.58 cm² (P < .0001); MVG remained statistically unchanged (3.82 mm Hg). Both MR models yielded no statistical difference between 1 and 2 MitraClips.

Conclusions

There is limited concern regarding elevation of MVG when reducing MR using 1 or 2 MitraClips, although 2 MitraClips did not significantly continue to reduce MRF.

SUBMITTER: Gooden SC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7704541 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined by the abundance of lipid droplets (LDs) in hepatocytes. While historically considered simply depots for energy storage, LDs are increasingly recognized to impact a wide range of biological processes that influence cellular metabolism, signaling, and function. While progress has been made toward understanding the factors leading to LD accumulation (i.e. steatosis) and its progression to advanced stages of NAFLD and/or systemic metabolic dysfunction, much remains to be resolved.Scope of reviewThis review covers many facets of LD biology. We provide a brief overview of the major pathways of lipid accretion and degradation that contribute to steatosis and how they are altered in NAFLD. The major focus is on the relationship between LDs and cell function and the detailed mechanisms that couple or uncouple steatosis from the severity and progression of NAFLD and systemic comorbidities. The importance of specific lipids and proteins within or on LDs as key components that determine whether LD accumulation is linked to cellular and metabolic dysfunction is presented. We discuss emerging areas of LD biology and future research directions that are needed to advance our understanding of the role of LDs in NAFLD etiology.Major conclusionsImpairments in LD breakdown appear to contribute to disease progression, but inefficient incorporation of fatty acids (FAs) into LD-containing triacylglycerol (TAG) and the consequential changes in FA partitioning also affect NAFLD etiology. Increased LD abundance in hepatocytes does not necessarily equate to cellular dysfunction. While LD accumulation is the prerequisite step for most NAFLD cases, the protein and lipid composition of LDs are critical factors in determining the progression from simple steatosis. Further defining the detailed molecular mechanisms linking LDs to metabolic dysfunction is important for designing effective therapeutic approaches targeting NAFLD and its comorbidities.